Positional and angular tracking of HDR

HDR brachytherapy quality assurance radiochromic film source tracking

Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 11 05 2020
revised: 31 08 2020
accepted: 25 09 2020
pubmed: 17 10 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 16 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To quantify and verify the dosimetric impact of high-dose rate (HDR) source positional uncertainty in brachytherapy, and to introduce a model for three-dimensional (3D) position tracking of the HDR source based on a two-dimensional (2D) measurement. This model has been utilized for the development of a comprehensive source quality assurance (QA) method using radiochromic film (RCF) dosimetry including assessment of different digitization uncertainties. An algorithm was developed and verified to generate 2D dose maps of the mHDR-V2 The maximum measured dosimetric variations on the 6F and 4F catheter surfaces were 39.8% and 36.1%, respectively. At 10 mm further, the variation reduced to 2.6% for the 4F catheter which is in agreement with the calculations. The source center (x, y) was strongly correlated with the low IDL-weighted centroid (PCC = 0.99), while the distance to source (z) was correlated with the IDL areas (PCC = 0.96) and perimeters (PCC = 0.99). The source orientation θ Isodose line features of a 2D dose map away from the HDR source can reveal its spatial coordinates. RCF was shown to be a suitable dosimeter for source tracking and dosimetry. This technique offers a novel source QA method and has the potential to be used for QA of commercial and customized applicators.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33064876
doi: 10.1002/mp.14540
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6122-6139

Subventions

Organisme : Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
ID : 386009
Organisme : Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
ID : 432290
Organisme : King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (King Faisal Specialist Hospital)
ID : 38/75

Informations de copyright

© 2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M, et al. Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM radiation therapy committee task group 40. Med Phys. 1994;21:581-618.
Nath R, Anderson LL, Meli JA, Olch AJ, Stitt JA, Williamson JF. Code of practice for brachytherapy physics: report of the AAPM radiation therapy committee task group no. 56. Med Phys. 1997;24:1557-1598.
Kubo HD, Glasgow GP, Pethel TD, Thomadsen BR, Williamson JF. High dose-rate brachytherapy treatment delivery: report of the AAPM radiation therapy committee task group no. 59. Med Phys. 1998;25:375-403.
DeWerd LA, Ibbott GS, Meigooni AS, et al. A dosimetric uncertainty analysis for photon-emitting brachytherapy sources: report of AAPM task group no. 138 and GEC-ESTRO. Med Phys. 2011;38:782-801.
Nath R, Anderson LL, Luxton G, Weaver KA, Williamson JF, Meigooni AS. Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: recommendations of the AAPM radiation therapy committee task group no. 43. Med Phys. 1995;22:209-234.
Rivard MJ, Coursey BM, DeWerd LA, et al. Update of AAPM task group no. 43 report: a revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations. Med Phys. 2004;31:633-674.
Taylor REP, Rogers DWO. EGSnrc Monte Carlo calculated dosimetry parameters for 192Ir and 169Yb brachytherapy sources. Med Phys. 2008;35:4933-4944.
Perez-Calatayud J, Ballester F, Das RK, et al. Dose calculation for photon-emitting brachytherapy sources with average energy higher than 50 keV: report of the AAPM and ESTRO. Med Phys. 2012;39:2904-2929.
McLaughlin WL, Yun-Dong C, Soares CG, Miller A, Van Dyk G, Lewis DF. Sensitometry of the response of a new radiochromic film dosimeter to gamma radiation and electron beams. Nuclear Inst Methods Phys Res A. 1991;302:165-176.
Devic S. Radiochromic film dosimetry: past, present, and future. Physica Med. 2011;27:122-134.
Devic S, Tomic N, Lewis D. Reference radiochromic film dosimetry: review of technical aspects. Physica Med. 2016;32:541-556.
Devic S, Tomic N, Soares CG, Podgorsak EB. Optimizing the dynamic range extension of a radiochromic film dosimetry system. Med Phys. 2009;36:429-437.
Niroomand-Rad A, Blackwell CR, Coursey BM, et al. AAPM TG 55. Radiochromic film dosimetry. Med Phys. 1998;25:2093-2115.
Sutherland JGH, Rogers DWO. Monte Carlo calculated absorbed-dose energy dependence of EBT and EBT2 film. Med Phys. 2010;37:1110-1116.
Arjomandy B, Tailor R, Anand A, et al. Energy dependence and dose response of Gafchromic EBT2 film over a wide range of photon, electron, and proton beam energies. Med Phys. 2010;37:1942-1947.
Bekerat H, Devic S, Deblois F, et al. Improving the energy response of external beam therapy (EBT) GafChromicTM dosimetry films at low energies (≤100 keV). Med Phys. 2014;41:022101.
Hammer CG, Rosen BS, Fagerstrom JM, Culberson WS, DeWerd LA. Experimental investigation of GafChromic ® EBT3 intrinsic energy dependence with kilovoltage x rays, 137 Cs, and 60 Co. Med Phys. 2018;45:448-459.
Evans MDC, Devic S, Podgorsak EB. High dose-rate brachytherapy source position quality assurance using radiochromic film. Med Dosim. 2007;32:13-15.
Asgharizadeh S, Bekerat H, Syme A, et al. Radiochromic film-based quality assurance for CT-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2015;14:578-585.
Awunor OA, Dixon B, Walker C. Direct reconstruction and associated uncertainties of 192Ir source dwell positions in ring applicators using gafchromic film in the treatment planning of HDR brachytherapy cervix patients. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:3207-3225.
Palmer AL, Lee C, Ratcliffe AJ, Bradley D, Nisbet A. Design and implementation of a film dosimetry audit tool for comparison of planned and delivered dose distributions in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:6623-6640.
Palmer A, Bradley D, Nisbet A. Physics-aspects of dose accuracy in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy: source dosimetry, treatment planning, equipment performance and in vivo verification techniques. J Contemp Brachyther. 2012;4:81-91.
Jursinic PA. Quality assurance measurements for high-dose-rate brachytherapy without film. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15:246-261.
Espinoza A, Petasecca M, Cutajar D, et al. Pretreatment verification of high dose rate brachytherapy plans using the ‘magic phantom’ system. Biomed Phys Eng Expr. 2015;1:025201.
Kertzscher G, Beddar S. Inorganic scintillation detectors for 192Ir brachytherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64:225018.
Therriault-Proulx F, Briere TM, Mourtada F, Aubin S, Beddar S, Beaulieu L. A phantom study of an in vivo dosimetry system using plastic scintillation detectors for real-time verification of 192Ir HDR brachytherapy. Med Phys. 2011;38:2542-2551.
Song H, Bowsher J, Das S, Yin FF. Tracking brachytherapy sources using emission imaging with one flat panel detector. Med Phys. 2009;36:1109-1111.
Smith RL, Haworth A, Panettieri V, Millar JL, Franich RD. A method for verification of treatment delivery in HDR prostate brachytherapy using a flat panel detector for both imaging and source tracking. Med Phys. 2016;43:2435-2442.
Okamoto H, Aikawa A, Wakita A, et al. Dose error from deviation of dwell time and source position for high dose-rate 192Ir in remote afterloading system. J Radiat Res. 2014;55:780-787.
Poulin E, Racine E, Binnekamp D, Beaulieu L. Fast, automatic, and accurate catheter reconstruction in HDR brachytherapy using an electromagnetic 3D tracking system. Med Phys. 2015;42:1227-1232.
Zhou J, Sebastian E, Mangona V, Yan D. Real-time catheter tracking for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy using an electromagnetic 3D-guidance device: a preliminary performance study. Med Phys. 2013;40:021716.
Kellermeier M, Herbolzheimer J, Kreppner S, Lotter M, Strnad V, Bert C. Electromagnetic tracking (EMT) technology for improved treatment quality assurance in interstitial brachytherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18:211-222.
Wang W, Viswanathan AN, Damato AL, et al. Evaluation of an active magnetic resonance tracking system for interstitial brachytherapy. Med Phys. 2015;42:7114-7121.
Moeslund TB. BLOB analysis. In: Moeslund TB, ed. Introduction to Video and Image Processing: Building Real Systems and Applications. Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer; 2012:103-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2503-7_7
Daskalov GM, Williamson JF, Baker R, Rogers DWO. Dosimetric modeling of the microselectron high-dose rate Ir-192 source by the multigroup discrete ordinates method. Med Phys (abstract). 1998;25:A119.
Aldelaijan S, Devic S, Papaconstadopoulos P, et al. Dose-response linearization in radiochromic film dosimetry based on multichannel normalized pixel value with an integrated spectral correction for scanner response variations. Med Phys. 2019;46:5336-5349.
Aldelaijan S, Mohammed H, Tomic N, et al. Radiochromic film dosimetry of HDR 192Ir source radiation fields. Med Phys. 2011;38:6074-6083.
Sarfehnia A, Kawrakow I, Seuntjens J. Direct measurement of absorbed dose to water in HDR 192Ir brachytherapy: water calorimetry, ionization chamber, Gafchromic film, and TG-43. Med Phys. 2010;37:1924-1932.
Pérez-Calatayud J, Granero D, Ballester F. Phantom size in brachytherapy source dosimetric studies. Med Phys. 2004;31:2075-2081.
Schoenfeld AA, Harder D, Poppe B, Chofor N. Water equivalent phantom materials for 192Ir brachytherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:9403-9420.
ICRU Report 89. Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Brachytherapy for Cancer of the Cervix. Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicru/ndw027
Vera Sánchez JA, Ruiz Morales C, González LA. Characterization of noise and digitizer response variability in radiochromic film dosimetry. Impact on treatment verification. Physica Medica. 2016;32:1167-1174.
Gaudreault M, Reniers B, Landry G, Verhaegen F, Beaulieu L. Dose perturbation due to catheter materials in high-dose-rate interstitial 192Ir brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2014;13:627-631.
Yang L, Albregtsen F, Lønnestad T, Grøttum P. Areas and perimeters of blob-like objects: A comparison. IAPR Workshop on Machine Vision Applications, Dec 13-15; 1994. Published online 1994:272276.
Watanabe Y, Muraishi H, Takei H, et al. Automated source tracking with a pinhole imaging system during high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:145002.
Smith RL, Hanlon M, Panettieri V, et al. An integrated system for clinical treatment verification of HDR prostate brachytherapy combining source tracking with pretreatment imaging. Brachytherapy. 2018;17:111-121.
Poder J, Cutajar D, Guatelli S, et al. HDR brachytherapy in vivo source position verification using a 2D diode array: a Monte Carlo study. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19:163-172.
Johansen JG, Rylander S, Buus S, et al. Time-resolved in vivo dosimetry for source tracking in brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2018;17:122-132.
Alnaghy S, Loo KJ, Cutajar DL, et al. BrachyView: multiple seed position reconstruction and comparison with CT post-implant dosimetry. J Instrum. 2016;11:P05002.
Romanyukha A, Carrara M, Mazzeo D, et al. An innovative gynecological HDR brachytherapy applicator system for treatment delivery and real-time verification. Physica Med. 2018;2019:151-157.
Palmer AL, Pietro PD, Alobaidli S, et al. Comparison of methods for the measurement of radiation dose distributions in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy: Ge-doped optical fiber, EBT3 Gafchromic film, and PRESAGE® radiochromic plastic. Med Phys. 2013;40:061707.
Sellakumar P, Sathish Kumar A, Supe SS, Anand MR, Nithya K, Sajitha S. Evaluation of dosimetric functions for Ir-192 source using radiochromic film. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2009;267:1862-1866.
Aldelaijan S, Wadi-Ramahi S, Nobah A, Moftah B, Devic S, Jastaniyah N. Commissioning of applicator-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy boost with high-dose-rate brachytherapy for advanced cervical cancer using radiochromic film dosimetry. Brachytherapy. 2017;16:893-902.
Ballester F, Granero D, Pérez-Calatayud J, Melhus CS, Rivard MJ. Evaluation of high-energy brachytherapy source electronic disequilibrium and dose from emitted electrons. Med Phys. 2009;36:4250-4256.

Auteurs

Saad Aldelaijan (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.
Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Department of Radiation Oncology, SMBD Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
Biomedical Physics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, 12713, Saudi Arabia.

Slobodan Devic (S)

Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Department of Radiation Oncology, SMBD Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.

Hamed Bekerat (H)

Department of Radiation Oncology, SMBD Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.

Pavlos Papaconstadopoulos (P)

Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands.

James Schneider (J)

Department of Radiation Oncology, SMBD Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.

Jan Seuntjens (J)

Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.

Robert A Cormack (RA)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Ivan M Buzurovic (IM)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Articles similaires

Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms, Imaging Infant, Newborn Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Humans Phantoms, Imaging Radiography Patient Positioning Radiology
Humans Female Precision Medicine Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Breast Neoplasms
Deep Learning Humans Microvessels Ultrasonography Phantoms, Imaging

Classifications MeSH