Exploring the Economic Benefits of Modafinil for Post-Stroke Fatigue in Australia: A Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation.


Journal

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association
ISSN: 1532-8511
Titre abrégé: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9111633

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 16 04 2020
revised: 15 07 2020
accepted: 26 07 2020
entrez: 17 10 2020
pubmed: 18 10 2020
medline: 25 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In stroke survivors, post-stroke fatigue predicts dependency in daily living and failure to return to work. Modafinil shows promise as a pharmacotherapy to reduce post-stroke fatigue and related sequelae, e.g., poorer functional and clinical outcomes. This study explored the cost-effectiveness of modafinil in treating post-stroke fatigue in the Australian context, by determining its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and by simulating the potential cost-savings on a national scale, through a re-analysis of MIDAS trial data. A post hoc cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken. Part A: patient-level cost and health effect data (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) scores) were derived from the MIDAS trial and analysis undertaken from a health-system perspective. Part B: a secondary analysis simulated the societal impact of modafinil therapy in terms of national productivity costs. Part A: Mean cost of modafinil treatment was AUD$3.60/day/patient for a minimally clinically important change (10 points) in total MFI fatigue score, i.e., AUD$0.36/day/unit change in fatigue score per patient. For the base case scenario, the ICER of using modafinil (versus placebo) was AUD$131.73 ($90.17 - 248.15, for minimum and maximum costs, respectively). Part B: The potential productivity cost-savings to society were calculated as nearly AUD$467 million over 1 year, and up to $383,471,991,248 over 10 years, from the widespread use of modafinil treatment in the Australian population of working-age stroke-survivors, representing a significant societal benefit. Modafinil is a highly cost-effective treatment for post-stroke fatigue, offering significant productivity gains and potential cost-savings to society from the widespread use of modafinil treatment in the Australian population of working-age stroke-survivors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In stroke survivors, post-stroke fatigue predicts dependency in daily living and failure to return to work. Modafinil shows promise as a pharmacotherapy to reduce post-stroke fatigue and related sequelae, e.g., poorer functional and clinical outcomes.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
This study explored the cost-effectiveness of modafinil in treating post-stroke fatigue in the Australian context, by determining its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and by simulating the potential cost-savings on a national scale, through a re-analysis of MIDAS trial data.
METHODS METHODS
A post hoc cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken. Part A: patient-level cost and health effect data (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) scores) were derived from the MIDAS trial and analysis undertaken from a health-system perspective. Part B: a secondary analysis simulated the societal impact of modafinil therapy in terms of national productivity costs.
RESULTS RESULTS
Part A: Mean cost of modafinil treatment was AUD$3.60/day/patient for a minimally clinically important change (10 points) in total MFI fatigue score, i.e., AUD$0.36/day/unit change in fatigue score per patient. For the base case scenario, the ICER of using modafinil (versus placebo) was AUD$131.73 ($90.17 - 248.15, for minimum and maximum costs, respectively). Part B: The potential productivity cost-savings to society were calculated as nearly AUD$467 million over 1 year, and up to $383,471,991,248 over 10 years, from the widespread use of modafinil treatment in the Australian population of working-age stroke-survivors, representing a significant societal benefit.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Modafinil is a highly cost-effective treatment for post-stroke fatigue, offering significant productivity gains and potential cost-savings to society from the widespread use of modafinil treatment in the Australian population of working-age stroke-survivors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33066879
pii: S1052-3057(20)30631-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105213
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Central Nervous System Stimulants 0
Modafinil R3UK8X3U3D

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105213

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this study.

Auteurs

Beata Bajorek (B)

Academic Pharmacist - Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales 2007, Australia; Research Affiliate - Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: beata.bajorek@uts.edu.au.

Lan Gao (L)

Senior Lecturer - Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3127, Australia. Electronic address: lan.gao@deakin.edu.au.

Tom Lillicrap (T)

Academic Pharmacist - Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales 2007, Australia; Clinical Scientist - Neurology Department, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales 2305, Australia. Electronic address: tom.lillicrap@newcastle.edu.au.

Andrew Bivard (A)

Research Affiliate - Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales, Australia; Principle Research Fellow - Melbourne School of Health Sciences - Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: abivard@unimelb.edu.au.

Carlos Garcia-Esperon (C)

Research Affiliate - Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales, Australia; Stroke Neurologist - Department of Neurology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales 2305, Australia. Electronic address: Carlos.GarciaEsperon@health.nsw.gov.au.

Mark Parsons (M)

Research Affiliate - Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales, Australia; Director of Neurology - Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia. Electronic address: Mark.Parsons@mh.org.au.

Neil Spratt (N)

Research Affiliate - Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales, Australia; Stroke Neurologist - Department of Neurology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales 2305, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia. Electronic address: neil.spratt@health.nsw.gov.au.

Elizabeth Holliday (E)

Research Affiliate - Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia. Electronic address: liz.holliday@newcastle.edu.au.

Chris Levi (C)

Research Affiliate - Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales, Australia; The Sydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research, and Enterprise (SPHERE), Liverpool, New South Wales 2170, Australia. Electronic address: christopher.levi@unsw.edu.au.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH