[Pneumo-Quest: A standardised self-questionnaire to be completed at home before a first appointment at a respiratory clinic].
Pneumo-Quest, auto-questionnaire standardisé à compléter au domicile avant une première consultation en pneumologie : étude de validation.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ambulatory Care
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Interviews as Topic
/ standards
Male
Medical History Taking
/ methods
Medical Records
/ standards
Middle Aged
Physician-Patient Relations
Pulmonary Medicine
/ methods
Reference Standards
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
/ standards
Time Factors
Young Adult
Anamnèse
Dossier médical
Histoire médicale
Maladies respiratoires questionnaire patient
Medical history
Medical records
Patient questionnaire
Preinterview
Respiratory diseases
Journal
Revue des maladies respiratoires
ISSN: 1776-2588
Titre abrégé: Rev Mal Respir
Pays: France
ID NLM: 8408032
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
30
12
2019
accepted:
24
08
2020
pubmed:
20
10
2020
medline:
17
12
2020
entrez:
19
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Pneumo-Quest self-questionnaire was developed to standardize the practice of recollection when welcoming a new patient. It consists of 82 main questions and 34 subsidiary questions to be completed at home by the patients before their first visit to a pulmonologist. This evaluation was carried out on the basis of 137 returned questionnaires. The feasibility (main criterion) was good with 93±5% of the questions answered and an average completion time of 15.1±9.8minutes (mean±SD). The reliability of the responses (secondary criterion) was good with the agreement between the patient's response and the doctor's opinion being excellent or good for the majority of medical histories and treatments, as evidenced by the high values of the kappa coefficient (>0.90; <0.90; <0.75). Patient and physician perception of the questionnaire was good with 99% and 90% positive ratings, respectively. The use of the questionnaire was unhelpful in the course of the consultation in only 2% of cases. Doctors found the tool useful for obtaining a comprehensive history in 87% of cases and patients declared that it helped them "forgot nothing" in 93% of the cases. The questionnaire helped the doctor to identify the patient's problems rapidly in 71% of cases and saved time in 64%. These positive results encourage a wide dissemination of the questionnaire (www.pneumo-quest.com).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33071064
pii: S0761-8425(20)30285-0
doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2020.08.011
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
fre
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
776-782Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.