Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices objective performance goals for superficial femoral and popliteal artery peripheral vascular interventions.


Journal

Journal of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-6809
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8407742

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2021
Historique:
received: 27 03 2020
accepted: 10 09 2020
pubmed: 21 10 2020
medline: 12 10 2021
entrez: 20 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Superficial Femoral Artery-Popliteal EvidencE Development Study Group developed contemporary objective performance goals (OPGs) for peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) for superficial femoral artery (SFA)-popliteal artery disease using the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices. The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative PVI registry from January 2010 to October 2016 was used to develop OPGs based on SFA-popliteal procedures (n = 21,377) for intermittent claudication and critical limb ischemia (CLI). OPGs included 1-year rates for target lesion revascularization (TLR), major amputation, and 1 and 4-year survival rates. OPGs were calculated for the SFA and popliteal arteries and stratified by four treatments: angioplasty alone (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]), self-expanding stenting, atherectomy, and any treatment type. Outcomes were illustrated by unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analyses. Cohorts included PTA (n = 7505), stenting (n = 9217), atherectomy (n = 2510) and any treatment (n = 21,377). The mean age was 69 years, 58% were male, 79% were White, and 52% had CLI. The freedom from TLR OPGs at 1 year in the SFA were 80.3% (PTA), 83.2% (stenting), 83.9% (atherectomy), and 81.9% (any treatments). The freedom from TLR OPGs at 1 year in the popliteal were 81.3% (PTA), 81.3% (stenting), 80.2% (atherectomy), and 81.1% (any treatments). The freedom from major amputation OPGs at 1 year after SFA PVI were 93.4% (PTA), 95.7% (stenting), 95.1% (atherectomy), and 94.8% (any treatments). The freedom from major amputation OPG at 1 year after popliteal PVI were 90.5% (PTA), 93.7% (stenting), 91.8% (atherectomy), and 91.8%, (any treatments). The 4-year survival OPGs after SFA PVI were 76% (PTA), 80% (stenting), 82% (atherectomy), and 79% (any treatments), and for the popliteal artery were 72% (PTA), 77% (stenting), 82% (atherectomy), and 75% (any treatment). On a multivariable analysis, which included patient-level, leg-level, and lesion-level covariates, CLI was the single independent factor associated with increased TLR, amputation, and mortality. The Superficial Femoral Artery-Popliteal EvidencE Development OPGs define a new, contemporary benchmark for SFA-popliteal interventions using a large subset of real-world evidence to inform more efficient peripheral device clinical trial designs to support regulatory and clinical decision-making. It is appropriate to discuss proposals intended for regulatory approval with the US Food and Drug Administration to refine the OPG to match the specific trial population. The OPGs may be updated using coordinated registry networks to assess long-term real-world device performance.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The Superficial Femoral Artery-Popliteal EvidencE Development Study Group developed contemporary objective performance goals (OPGs) for peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) for superficial femoral artery (SFA)-popliteal artery disease using the Registry Assessment of Peripheral Interventional Devices.
METHODS
The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative PVI registry from January 2010 to October 2016 was used to develop OPGs based on SFA-popliteal procedures (n = 21,377) for intermittent claudication and critical limb ischemia (CLI). OPGs included 1-year rates for target lesion revascularization (TLR), major amputation, and 1 and 4-year survival rates. OPGs were calculated for the SFA and popliteal arteries and stratified by four treatments: angioplasty alone (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]), self-expanding stenting, atherectomy, and any treatment type. Outcomes were illustrated by unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analyses.
RESULTS
Cohorts included PTA (n = 7505), stenting (n = 9217), atherectomy (n = 2510) and any treatment (n = 21,377). The mean age was 69 years, 58% were male, 79% were White, and 52% had CLI. The freedom from TLR OPGs at 1 year in the SFA were 80.3% (PTA), 83.2% (stenting), 83.9% (atherectomy), and 81.9% (any treatments). The freedom from TLR OPGs at 1 year in the popliteal were 81.3% (PTA), 81.3% (stenting), 80.2% (atherectomy), and 81.1% (any treatments). The freedom from major amputation OPGs at 1 year after SFA PVI were 93.4% (PTA), 95.7% (stenting), 95.1% (atherectomy), and 94.8% (any treatments). The freedom from major amputation OPG at 1 year after popliteal PVI were 90.5% (PTA), 93.7% (stenting), 91.8% (atherectomy), and 91.8%, (any treatments). The 4-year survival OPGs after SFA PVI were 76% (PTA), 80% (stenting), 82% (atherectomy), and 79% (any treatments), and for the popliteal artery were 72% (PTA), 77% (stenting), 82% (atherectomy), and 75% (any treatment). On a multivariable analysis, which included patient-level, leg-level, and lesion-level covariates, CLI was the single independent factor associated with increased TLR, amputation, and mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
The Superficial Femoral Artery-Popliteal EvidencE Development OPGs define a new, contemporary benchmark for SFA-popliteal interventions using a large subset of real-world evidence to inform more efficient peripheral device clinical trial designs to support regulatory and clinical decision-making. It is appropriate to discuss proposals intended for regulatory approval with the US Food and Drug Administration to refine the OPG to match the specific trial population. The OPGs may be updated using coordinated registry networks to assess long-term real-world device performance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33080324
pii: S0741-5214(20)32202-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.09.030
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1702-1714.e11

Subventions

Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : U01 FD005478
Pays : United States
Organisme : FDA HHS
ID : U01 FD006936
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Daniel J Bertges (DJ)

University of Vermont Medical Center, Division of Vascular Surgery, Burlington, VT. Electronic address: daniel.bertges@uvmhealth.org.

Roseann White (R)

Your Third Opinion, Chapel Hill, NC.

Yu-Ching Cheng (YC)

US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md.

Tianyi Sun (T)

Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Populations Health Sciences, Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, NY.

Niveditta Ramkumar (N)

Section of Vascular Surgery and the Dartmouth Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.

Philip P Goodney (PP)

Section of Vascular Surgery and the Dartmouth Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.

Rebecca W Wilgus (RW)

Department of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Aaron E Lottes (AE)

Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind.

Joshua A Smale (JA)

BD Peripheral Intervention, Tempe, Ariz.

Joseph Drozda (J)

Mercy Health, Chesterfield, Mo.

Melanie Raska (M)

Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Mass.

Ted Heise (T)

MED Institute, West Lafayette, IN.

W Schuyler Jones (WS)

Department of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

James E Tcheng (JE)

Department of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen (J)

Division of Vascular Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Me.

Art Sedrakyan (A)

Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Populations Health Sciences, Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, NY.

Misti L Malone (ML)

US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md.

Danica Marinac-Dabic (D)

US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md.

Robert Thatcher (R)

4C Medical Technologies, Brooklyn Park, Minn.

Pablo Morales (P)

US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md.

Mitchell W Krucoff (MW)

Department of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Jack L Cronenwett (JL)

Section of Vascular Surgery and the Dartmouth Institute, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH