Image segmentation of plexiform neurofibromas from a deep neural network using multiple b-value diffusion data.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 10 2020
20 10 2020
Historique:
received:
29
01
2020
accepted:
06
10
2020
entrez:
21
10
2020
pubmed:
22
10
2020
medline:
9
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We assessed the accuracy of semi-automated tumor volume maps of plexiform neurofibroma (PN) generated by a deep neural network, compared to manual segmentation using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) data. NF1 Patients were recruited from a phase II clinical trial for the treatment of PN. Multiple b-value DWI was imaged over the largest PN. All DWI datasets were registered and intensity normalized prior to segmentation with a multi-spectral neural network classifier (MSNN). Manual volumes of PN were performed on 3D-T2 images registered to diffusion images and compared to MSNN volumes with the Sørensen-Dice coefficient. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters were calculated from resulting volumes. 35 MRI scans were included from 14 subjects. Sørensen-Dice coefficient between the semi-automated and manual segmentation was 0.77 ± 0.016. Perfusion fraction (f) was significantly higher for tumor versus normal tissue (0.47 ± 0.42 vs. 0.30 ± 0.22, p = 0.02), similarly, true diffusion (D) was significantly higher for PN tumor versus normal (0.0018 ± 0.0003 vs. 0.0012 ± 0.0002, p < 0.0001). By contrast, the pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*) was significantly lower for PN tumor versus normal (0.024 ± 0.01 vs. 0.031 ± 0.005, p < 0.0001). Volumes generated by a neural network from multiple diffusion data on PNs demonstrated good correlation with manual volumes. IVIM analysis of multiple b-value diffusion data demonstrates significant differences between PN and normal tissue.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33082502
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74920-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-74920-1
pmc: PMC7575542
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17857Références
Am J Med Genet A. 2010 Feb;152A(2):327-32
pubmed: 20082463
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014 Jul;9(4):683-93
pubmed: 24254804
J Pediatr. 2012 Mar;160(3):461-7
pubmed: 21996156
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Dec;13(12):1218-24
pubmed: 23099009
Nat Rev Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(8):500-510
pubmed: 29777175
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017 Jun 21;19:221-248
pubmed: 28301734
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jun;196(6):1351-61
pubmed: 21606299
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Feb;14(2):191-197
pubmed: 27956140
Genet Med. 2010 Jan;12(1):1-11
pubmed: 20027112
Radiology. 1986 Nov;161(2):401-7
pubmed: 3763909
Neural Comput. 2017 Sep;29(9):2352-2449
pubmed: 28599112
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Feb;180(2):419-23
pubmed: 12540445
Anticancer Res. 2015 Dec;35(12):6509-16
pubmed: 26637864
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Aug;30(4):449-459
pubmed: 28577131
Radiology. 2009 Mar;250(3):665-73
pubmed: 19244040
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2004 Jul;28(5):257-65
pubmed: 15249071
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Apr;210(4):799-806
pubmed: 29446673
Acta Radiol. 2001 Mar;42(2):123-8
pubmed: 11281143
Neurosurgery. 2008 Jun;62(6):1314-9; discussion 1319-20
pubmed: 18824998