In vivo osseointegration and erosion of nacre screws in an animal model.
erosion
maxillofacial surgery
mother of pearl
nacre
osseointegration
resorbable device
titanium screw
Journal
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials
ISSN: 1552-4981
Titre abrégé: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101234238
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
revised:
05
08
2020
received:
04
04
2020
accepted:
07
10
2020
pubmed:
23
10
2020
medline:
5
2
2022
entrez:
22
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of resorbable devices for osteosynthesis has become a subject of interest. Nacre has been proposed as a resorbable and osteoconductive material favoring bone apposition without triggering an inflammatory reaction. We compared the in vivo osseointegration and erosion of nacre screws in an animal model with titanium screws. Implantation of similar nacre and titanium screws was performed in the femoral condyles of adult rats. Animals (n = 41) were randomized in four groups sacrificed at day one, 1, 6, and 12 months. Microcomputed tomography (microCT) allowed 3D morphometry of erosion of nacre. Osseointegration was measured as the volume of trabecular bone bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) in a standardized volume of interest around each screw. Undecalcified bone histology was also done. Gross examination revealed a similar clinical osseointegration for titanium and nacre screws. A progressive erosion of nacre screws, but no erosion of titanium screws, was observed in microCT. The volume of nacre screws progressively decreased over time whereas no modification occurred for titanium. For titanium screws, BV/TV remained stable throughout the study. For nacre screws, the BV/TV decrease was not statistically different. A significant difference was found between nacre and titanium screws at 6 months but not at 12 months. The screw heads, outside the bone shaft, were not eroded even after 12 months. Erosion of nacre occurred during the entire study period, only within the bone shaft in direct contact with bone marrow. Bone apposition was observed on nacre surfaces without signs of erosion. Nacre is a promising biomaterial in maxillofacial surgery.
Substances chimiques
Nacre
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
780-788Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Albrektsson T, Brånemark P-I, Hansson H-A, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1981;52:155-170.
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. An animal study of cp titanium screws with different surface topographies. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 1995;6:302-309.
Rony L, Lancigu R, Hubert L. Intraosseous metal implants in orthopedics: a review. Morphologie. 2018;102:231-242.
Brånemark R, Brånemark P, Rydevik B, Myers RR. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. J Rehab Res Develop. 2001;38:175-182.
Middleton JC, Tipton AJ. Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices. Biomaterials. 2000;21:2335-2346.
Bohner M. Resorbable biomaterials as bone graft substitutes. Mater Today. 2010;13:24-30.
Agarwal S, Gupta A, Grevious M, Reid RR. Use of resorbable implants for mandibular fixation: a systematic review. J Craniofacial Surg. 2009;20:331-339.
Chocron Y, Azzi AJ, Cugno S. Resorbable implants for mandibular fracture fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg-Global Open. 2019;7:e2384.
Böstman OM, Pihlajamäki HK. Adverse tissue reactions to bioabsorbable fixation devices. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:216-227.
Aristizabal AFC, Sanders EJ, Barber FA. Adverse events associated with biodegradable lactide-containing suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:555-560.
Libouban H, Pascaretti-Grizon F, Camprasse G, Camprasse S, Chappard D. In vivo erosion of orthopedic screws prepared from nacre (mother of pearl). Orthop Traumatol: Surg Res. 2016;102:913-918.
Chappard D, Kun-Darbois JD, Pascaretti-Grizon F, Camprasse G, Camprasse S. Giant cells and osteoclasts present in bone grafted with nacre differ by nuclear cytometry evaluated by texture analysis. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2019;30:100.
Zhang G, Brion A, Willemin AS, et al. Nacre, a natural, multi-use, and timely biomaterial for bone graft substitution. J Biomed Mater Res-A. 2017;105:662-671.
Mouries LP, Almeida MJ, Milet C, Berland S, Lopez E. Bioactivity of nacre water-soluble organic matrix from the bivalve mollusk Pinctada maxima in three mammalian cell types: fibroblasts, bone marrow stromal cells and osteoblasts. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B, Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;132:217-229.
Pascaretti-Grizon F, Libouban H, Camprasse G, Camprasse S, Mallet R, Chappard D. The interface between nacre and bone after implantation in the sheep: a nanotomographic and Raman study. J Raman Spectrosc. 2014;45:558-564.
Hamza S, Slimane N, Azari Z, Pluvinage G. Structural and mechanical properties of the coral and nacre and the potentiality of their use as bone substitutes. Appl Surface Sci. 2012;264:485-491.
Berland S, Delattre O, Borzeix S, Catonne Y, Lopez E. Nacre/bone interface changes in durable nacre endosseous implants in sheep. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2767-2773.
Duplat D, Chabadel A, Gallet M, et al. The in vitro osteoclastic degradation of nacre. Biomaterials. 2007;28:2155-2162.
Lamghari M, Berland S, Laurent A, Huet H, Lopez E. Bone reactions to nacre injected percutaneously into the vertebrae of sheep. Biomaterials. 2001;22:555-562.
Sweedy A, Bohner M, van Lenthe GH, Baroud G. A novel method for segmenting and aligning the pre- and post-implantation scaffolds of resorbable calcium-phosphate bone substitutes. Acta Biomater. 2017;54:441-453.
Dempster DW, Compston JE, Drezner MK, et al. Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: a 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR histomorphometry nomenclature committee. J Bone Mineral Res. 2013;28:2-17.
Chappard D . Technical Aspects: How do we Best Prepare Bone Samples for Proper Histological Analysis? Bone Cancer. 2nd ed. Paris: Elsevier; 2015:111-120.
Atlan G, Delattre O, Berland S, et al. Interface between bone and nacre implants in sheep. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1017-1022.
Liao H, Mutvei H, Sjöström M, Hammarström L, Li J. Tissue responses to natural aragonite (Margaritifera shell) implants in vivo. Biomaterials. 2000;21:457-468.
Alexander KA, Raggatt LJ, Millard S, et al. Resting and injury-induced inflamed periosteum contain multiple macrophage subsets that are located at sites of bone growth and regeneration. Immunol Cell Biol. 2017;95:7-16.
Batoon L, Millard SM, Wullschleger ME, et al. CD169+ macrophages are critical for osteoblast maintenance and promote intramembranous and endochondral ossification during bone repair. Biomaterials. 2019;196:51-66.
Bozec A, Soulat D. Latest perspectives on macrophages in bone homeostasis. Pflügers Archives Eur J Physiol. 2017;469:517-525.
Chang MK, Raggatt L-J, Alexander KA, et al. Osteal tissue macrophages are intercalated throughout human and mouse bone lining tissues and regulate osteoblast function in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol. 2008;181:1232-1244.
Rubin CT, Bain SD, McLeod KJ. Suppression of the osteogenic response in the aging skeleton. Calcified Tissue Int. 1992;50:306-313.
Courpron P, Meunier P, Edouard C, Bernard J, Bringuier JP, Vignon G. Quantitative histological data on the aging of human bone. Revue du Rhumatisme et Des Maladies Osteo-Articulaires. 1973;40:469-483.
Lu H, Cui L, Zuo C, Lin S, Wu T. Evaluation of morphological parameters of bone formation in Sprague-Dawley rats of different ages by in vivo fluorochrome labeling. Ital J Zool. 2015;82:33-40.
Rony L, Aguado E, Pascaretti-Grizon F, Hubert L, Chappard D. Hyaluronic acid stimulates osseointegration of β-TCP in young and old ewes. Calcified Tissue Int. 2019;105:487-496.
Barthelat F, Li C-M, Comi C, Espinosa HD. Mechanical properties of nacre constituents and their impact on mechanical performance. J Mater Res. 2006;21:1977-1986.
Liaqat F, Tahir MN, Schechtel E, et al. High-performance TiO2 nanoparticle/DOPA-polymer composites. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2015;36:1129-1137.
Song F, Soh A, Bai Y. Structural and mechanical properties of the organic matrix layers of nacre. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3623-3631.
Gopalan H, Chokshi AH. The mechanical behavior of nacre across length scales. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;78:96-107.
Pascual D, Roig R, Chossegros C. Bone graft reconstruction for posterior mandibular segment using the formwork technique. Stomatologie Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale et de Chirurgie Orale. 2014;115:105-110.