Are perceptions of government intervention for prevention different by gender and age? Results from the AUStralian Perceptions Of Prevention Survey (AUSPOPS).

Attitudes Australia Chronic disease Non-communicable disease Policy Prevention Public opinion

Journal

Preventive medicine
ISSN: 1096-0260
Titre abrégé: Prev Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0322116

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
received: 13 05 2020
revised: 07 10 2020
accepted: 10 10 2020
pubmed: 23 10 2020
medline: 25 6 2021
entrez: 22 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Understanding public opinion and community attitudes is needed to help the implementation of chronic disease prevention policies that are acceptable to the population. The AUStralian Perceptions Of Prevention Survey ('AUSPOPS') is a national survey designed to provide evidence on the views of Australians regarding government intervention for prevention. However there is limited evidence whether age and gender have modifying effects on attitudes about prevention. Using results from the 2018 AUSPOPS dataset, this study examines whether the effect of age on attitudes about prevention is modified by the effect of gender. Survey questions included views about statements for government intervention and whether government had gone far enough for thirteen different preventive interventions. 2601 Australian residents aged 18 years or older participated in the survey (response rate 16.7%). Results showed strong support for prevention framed as a shared responsibility between governments and individuals. Interventions where >50% of respondents felt the government had not gone far enough in prevention were restricting unhealthy food advertising for children and setting salt limits on processed food. There were significant age by gender interactions in a small number (n = 4) of questions examining support for government intervention for prevention, suggesting young men were least in favour of more action by government. There is general support in the Australian community for government intervention for prevention. Policymakers could capitalize on this sentiment by prioritizing policies with high levels of support across all groups, and target population subgroups on issues where acceptability appears to be heterogenous.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33091415
pii: S0091-7435(20)30313-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106289
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106289

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Eloise Howse (E)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Prevention Research Collaboration, Level 6 Charles Perkins Centre D17, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, 30C Wentworth St, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia. Electronic address: elly.howse@sydney.edu.au.

Erika Bohn-Goldbaum (E)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Prevention Research Collaboration, Level 6 Charles Perkins Centre D17, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, 30C Wentworth St, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia.

Becky Freeman (B)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Prevention Research Collaboration, Level 6 Charles Perkins Centre D17, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Adrian Bauman (A)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Prevention Research Collaboration, Level 6 Charles Perkins Centre D17, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, 30C Wentworth St, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia.

Anne C Grunseit (AC)

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Prevention Research Collaboration, Level 6 Charles Perkins Centre D17, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, 30C Wentworth St, Glebe, NSW 2037, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH