Relationship between media multitasking and functional connectivity in the dorsal attention network.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 10 2020
22 10 2020
Historique:
received:
27
03
2020
accepted:
24
09
2020
entrez:
23
10
2020
pubmed:
24
10
2020
medline:
11
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With the development of digital technology, media multitasking behaviour, which is using two or more media simultaneously, has become more commonplace. There are two opposing hypotheses of media multitasking with regard to its impact on attention. One hypothesis claims that media multitasking can strengthen attention control, and the other claims heavy media multitaskers are less able to focus on relevant tasks in the presence of distractors. A total of 103 healthy subjects took part in this study. We measured the Media Multitasking Index (MMI) and subjects performed the continuous performance test. Resting state and oddball task functional MRI were conducted to analyse functional connectivity in the dorsal attention network, and the degree centrality (DC) was calculated using graph theory analysis. We found that the DCs in the dorsal attention network were higher during resting state than during the oddball task. Furthermore, the DCs during the task were positively correlated with the MMI. These results indicated that the DC reduction from resting state to the oddball task in high media multitaskers was attenuated compared with low media multitaskers. This study not only reveals more about the neurophysiology of media multitasking, but could also indicate brain biomarkers of media multitasking behaviour.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33093496
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75091-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-75091-9
pmc: PMC7582949
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17992Références
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 24;9(9):e106698
pubmed: 25250778
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004 Apr;14(2):212-7
pubmed: 15082327
Neuroimage. 2016 Jul 1;134:113-121
pubmed: 27063068
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
pubmed: 11994752
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2620-2641
pubmed: 28840547
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Oct;24(10):2619-29
pubmed: 23645721
Neuroimage. 2010 Sep;52(3):1059-69
pubmed: 19819337
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1274-81
pubmed: 23722949
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Sep;16(9):1348-55
pubmed: 23892552
J Neurosci. 2016 Aug 17;36(33):8551-61
pubmed: 27535904
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;106(3):1125-65
pubmed: 21653723
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Jul;9(7):971-8
pubmed: 16767087
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Oct;15(10):483-506
pubmed: 21908230
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1973 Apr;28(4):533-7
pubmed: 4692152
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):90-101
pubmed: 17560126
J Neurosci. 1984 Jul;4(7):1863-74
pubmed: 6737043
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1485-1495
pubmed: 23398256
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Feb;77(2):390-401
pubmed: 25280520
Neuron. 2008 May 8;58(3):306-24
pubmed: 18466742
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Apr;35(4):1700-9
pubmed: 23670989
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 May;35(5):2265-84
pubmed: 23900833
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54402
pubmed: 23372720
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Mar;79(3):1535-48
pubmed: 9497430
J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 15;34(3):932-40
pubmed: 24431451
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Jan;78(1):218-41
pubmed: 26474982
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Dec 10;12:493
pubmed: 30618678
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 27;103(26):10046-51
pubmed: 16788060
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:1-18
pubmed: 30597260
Neuroimage. 2014 Jul 15;95:232-47
pubmed: 24657355
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2142-54
pubmed: 22019881
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 15;106(37):15583-7
pubmed: 19706386
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006 Jun;60(3):332-9
pubmed: 16732750