Esophagogastric junction morphology and contractile integral on high-resolution manometry in asymptomatic healthy volunteers: An international multicenter study.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aging
/ physiology
Cohort Studies
Esophagogastric Junction
/ anatomy & histology
Female
Gastroesophageal Reflux
/ physiopathology
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Male
Manometry
/ instrumentation
Middle Aged
Muscle Contraction
/ physiology
Reference Values
Respiratory Mechanics
Sex Characteristics
Software
Young Adult
barrier function
esophagogastric junction
lower esophageal sphincter pressure
Journal
Neurogastroenterology and motility
ISSN: 1365-2982
Titre abrégé: Neurogastroenterol Motil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9432572
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
revised:
22
08
2020
received:
19
06
2020
accepted:
21
09
2020
pubmed:
24
10
2020
medline:
11
1
2022
entrez:
23
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) and EGJ morphology are high-resolution manometry (HRM) metrics that assess EGJ barrier function. Normative data standardized across world regions and HRM manufacturers are limited. Our aim was to determine normative EGJ metrics in a large international cohort of healthy volunteers undergoing HRM (Medtronic, Laborie, and Diversatek software) acquired from 16 countries in four world regions. EGJ-CI was calculated by the same two investigators using a distal contractile integral-like measurement across the EGJ for three respiratory cycles and corrected for respiration (mm Hg cm), using manufacturer-specific software tools. EGJ morphology was designated according to Chicago Classification v3.0. Median EGJ-CI values were calculated across age, genders, HRM systems, and regions. Of 484 studies (28.0 years, 56.2% F, 60.7% Medtronic studies, 26.0% Laborie, and 13.2% Diversatek), EGJ morphology was type 1 in 97.1%. Median EGJ-CI was similar between Medtronic (37.0 mm Hg cm, IQR 23.6-53.7 mm Hg cm) and Diversatek (34.9 mm Hg cm, IQR 22.1-56.1 mm Hg cm, P = 0.87), but was significantly higher using Laborie equipment (56.5 mm Hg cm, IQR 35.0-75.3 mm Hg cm, P < 0.001). 5 EGJ morphology is predominantly type 1 in healthy adults. EGJ-CI varies widely in health, with significant gender influence, but is consistent within each HRM system. Manufacturer-specific normative values should be utilized for clinical HRM interpretation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) and EGJ morphology are high-resolution manometry (HRM) metrics that assess EGJ barrier function. Normative data standardized across world regions and HRM manufacturers are limited.
METHODS
Our aim was to determine normative EGJ metrics in a large international cohort of healthy volunteers undergoing HRM (Medtronic, Laborie, and Diversatek software) acquired from 16 countries in four world regions. EGJ-CI was calculated by the same two investigators using a distal contractile integral-like measurement across the EGJ for three respiratory cycles and corrected for respiration (mm Hg cm), using manufacturer-specific software tools. EGJ morphology was designated according to Chicago Classification v3.0. Median EGJ-CI values were calculated across age, genders, HRM systems, and regions.
RESULTS
Of 484 studies (28.0 years, 56.2% F, 60.7% Medtronic studies, 26.0% Laborie, and 13.2% Diversatek), EGJ morphology was type 1 in 97.1%. Median EGJ-CI was similar between Medtronic (37.0 mm Hg cm, IQR 23.6-53.7 mm Hg cm) and Diversatek (34.9 mm Hg cm, IQR 22.1-56.1 mm Hg cm, P = 0.87), but was significantly higher using Laborie equipment (56.5 mm Hg cm, IQR 35.0-75.3 mm Hg cm, P < 0.001). 5
CONCLUSIONS
EGJ morphology is predominantly type 1 in healthy adults. EGJ-CI varies widely in health, with significant gender influence, but is consistent within each HRM system. Manufacturer-specific normative values should be utilized for clinical HRM interpretation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33094875
doi: 10.1111/nmo.14009
pmc: PMC9380029
mid: NIHMS1829170
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14009Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P01 DK117824
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74
pubmed: 25469569
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Oct;27(10):1423-31
pubmed: 26227513
Arq Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr-Jun;57(2):209-215
pubmed: 32401949
Dis Esophagus. 2015 Oct;28(7):684-90
pubmed: 25082444
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr 21;23(15):2785-2794
pubmed: 28487616
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Oct;29(7):820-828
pubmed: 26173375
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Aug;32(8):1443-1449
pubmed: 28061013
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Dec;29(12):
pubmed: 28544357
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 May;28(5):639-46
pubmed: 26768087
Gastroenterology. 2005 Jan;128(1):209-24
pubmed: 15633138
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Dec;213(6):743-50
pubmed: 22107919
N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 27;336(13):924-32
pubmed: 9070474
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Mar;26(3):353-60
pubmed: 24460814
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003 Dec;15(6):591-606
pubmed: 14651595
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Mar;32(3):e13750
pubmed: 31633258
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Jan 30;23(1):27-33
pubmed: 27426485
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011 Nov;23(11):e461-9
pubmed: 21595803
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014 Oct;24(4):527-43
pubmed: 25216901
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Aug;27(8):1175-82
pubmed: 26010058
Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1351-1362
pubmed: 29437910
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Sep;30(9):e13344
pubmed: 29644765
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 May;102(5):1056-63
pubmed: 17319930