Implementation of national antenatal hypertension guidelines: a multicentre multiple methods study.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 10 2020
Historique:
entrez: 25 10 2020
pubmed: 26 10 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To evaluate the implementation of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence antenatal hypertension guidelines, to identify strategies to reduce incidences of severe hypertension and associated maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in pregnant women with chronic hypertension. We used a multiple method multisite approach to establish implementation of guidelines and the associated barriers and facilitators. We used a national survey of healthcare professionals (n=97), case notes review (n=55) and structured observations (n=42) to assess implementation. The barriers and facilitators to implementation were identified from semistructured qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals (n=13) and pregnant women (n=18) using inductive thematic analysis. The findings were integrated and evaluated using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Pregnant women with chronic hypertension and their principal carers (obstetricians, midwives and physicians), at three National Health Service hospital trusts with different models of care. We found severe hypertension to be prevalent (46% of case notes reviewed) and target blood pressure practices to be suboptimal (56% of women had an antenatal blood pressure target documented). Women were infrequently given information (52%) or offered choice (19%) regarding antihypertensives. Women (14/18) reported internal conflict in taking antihypertensives and non-adherence was prevalent (8/18). Women who were concordant with treatment recommendations described having mutual trust with professionals mediated through appropriate information, side effect management and involvement in decision making. Professionals reported needing updates and tools for target blood pressure setting and shared decision making underpinned by antihypertensive safety and effectiveness research. Women's non-adherence to antihypertensives is higher than anticipated. Suboptimal information provision around treatment, choice of antihypertensives and target setting practices by healthcare professionals may be contributory. Understanding the reasons for non-adherence will inform education and decision-making strategies needed to address both clinician and women's behaviour. Further research into the effectiveness and long-term safety of common antihypertensives is also required.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33099489
pii: bmjopen-2019-035762
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035762
pmc: PMC7590365
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e035762

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-2014-05-019
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

BMJ. 2008 May 17;336(7653):1114-7
pubmed: 18480115
Hypertension. 2016 Nov;68(5):1153-1159
pubmed: 27620393
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13(2):92-8
pubmed: 18416914
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;116(3):659-66
pubmed: 20733449
Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1331-40
pubmed: 21496916
BMJ. 2014 Apr 15;348:g2301
pubmed: 24735917
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 01;10:CD002252
pubmed: 30277556
Qual Manag Health Care. 2013 Apr-Jun;22(2):117-25
pubmed: 23542366
Hypertension. 2017 Nov;70(5):915-922
pubmed: 28893900
BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 06;4(3):e004339
pubmed: 24604483
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:796590
pubmed: 22242026
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):407-17
pubmed: 25629739
Implement Sci. 2016 May 17;11:72
pubmed: 27189233
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Feb;36(1):145-53
pubmed: 24162929
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):787
pubmed: 10488029
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2016 Oct;6(4):350-355
pubmed: 27939481
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;116(5):1022-6
pubmed: 20966684
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
pubmed: 10625273
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226

Auteurs

Rebecca Whybrow (R)

Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK rebecca.whybrow@kcl.ac.uk.
Division of Women and Children's Health, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.

Louise Webster (L)

Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.

Joanna Girling (J)

Women's Health Service, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Heather Brown (H)

Maternity, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.

Hannah Wilson (H)

Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.

Jane Sandall (J)

Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.

Lucy Chappell (L)

Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Division of Women and Children's Health, Guy's and Saint Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH