Exploring the Potential of 3D-printing in Biological Education: A Review of the Literature.


Journal

Integrative and comparative biology
ISSN: 1557-7023
Titre abrégé: Integr Comp Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101152341

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 29 10 2020
medline: 25 2 2023
entrez: 28 10 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Science education is most effective when it provides authentic experiences that reflect professional practices and approaches that address issues relevant to students' lives and communities. Such educational experiences are becoming increasingly interdisciplinary and can be enhanced using digital fabrication. Digital fabrication is the process of designing objects for the purpose of fabricating with machinery such as 3D-printers, laser cutters, and Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machines. Historically, these types of tools have been exceptionally costly and difficult to access; however, recent advancements in technological design have been accompanied by decreasing prices. In this review, we first establish the historical and theoretical foundations that support the use of digital fabrication as a pedagogical strategy to enhance learning. We specifically chose to focus attention on 3D-printing because this type of technology is becoming increasingly advanced, affordable, and widely available. We systematically reviewed the last 20 years of literature that characterized the use of 3D-printing in biological education, only finding a total of 13 articles that attempted to investigate the benefits for student learning. While the pedagogical value of student-driven creation is strongly supported by educational literature, it was challenging to make broad claims about student learning in relation to using or creating 3D-printed models in the context of biological education. Additional studies are needed to systematically investigate the impact of student-driven creation at the intersection of biology and engineering or computer science education.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33111943
pii: 5869801
doi: 10.1093/icb/icaa100
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

896-905

Informations de copyright

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology 2020. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Auteurs

Alexandria K Hansen (AK)

Department of Biology, California State University, Fresno, CA, USA.

Taylor R Langdon (TR)

Department of Biology, California State University, Fresno, CA, USA.

Lukyon W Mendrin (LW)

Department of Biology, California State University, Fresno, CA, USA.

Kaylin Peters (K)

Department of Biology, California State University, Fresno, CA, USA.

Jose Ramos (J)

Department of Biology, California State University, Fresno, CA, USA.

David D Lent (DD)

Department of Biology, California State University, Fresno, CA, USA.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH