Comparative Performance of Private Equity-Owned US Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Coronavirus Infections
/ epidemiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Equipment and Supplies
Government
Health Facilities, Proprietary
Homes for the Aged
Humans
Investments
Nurses
Nursing Homes
Ownership
Pandemics
Personal Protective Equipment
Personnel Management
Pneumonia, Viral
/ epidemiology
Private Sector
Public Sector
Quality of Health Care
SARS-CoV-2
Skilled Nursing Facilities
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2020
01 10 2020
Historique:
entrez:
28
10
2020
pubmed:
29
10
2020
medline:
6
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is not known whether nursing homes with private equity (PE) ownership have performed better or worse than other nursing homes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To evaluate the comparative performance of PE-owned nursing homes on COVID-19 outcomes. This cross-sectional study of 11 470 US nursing homes used the Nursing Home COVID-19 Public File from May 17, 2020, to July 2, 2020, to compare outcomes of PE-owned nursing homes with for-profit, nonprofit, and government-owned homes, adjusting for facility characteristics. Nursing home ownership status. Self-reported number of COVID-19 cases and deaths and deaths by any cause per 1000 residents; possessing 1-week supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE); staffing shortages. Of 11 470 nursing homes, 7793 (67.9%) were for-profit; 2523 (22.0%), nonprofit; 511 (5.3%), government-owned; and 543 (4.7%), PE-owned; with mean (SD) COVID-19 cases per 1000 residents of 88.3 [2.1], 67.0 [3.8], 39.8 [7.6] and 110.8 [8.1], respectively. Mean (SD) COVID-19 deaths per 1000 residents were 61.9 [1.6], 66.4 [3.0], 56.2 [7.3], and 78.9 [5.9], respectively; mean deaths by any cause per 1000 residents were 78.1 [1.3], 91.5 [2.2], 67.6 [4.5], and 87.9 [4.8], respectively. In adjusted analyses, government-owned homes had 35.5 (95% CI, -69.2 to -1.8; P = .03) fewer COVID-19 cases per 1000 residents than PE-owned nursing homes. Cases in PE-owned nursing homes were not statistically different compared with for-profit and nonprofit facilities; nor were there statistically significant differences in COVID-19 deaths or deaths by any cause between PE-owned nursing homes and for-profit, nonprofit, and government-owned facilities. For-profit, nonprofit, and government-owned nursing homes were 10.5% (9.1 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.8 to 16.3 percentage points; P = .006), 15.0% (13.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.5 to 20.6 percentage points; P < .001), and 17.0% (14.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 6.5 to 23.0 percentage points; P < .001), respectively, more likely to have at least a 1-week supply of N95 masks than PE-owned nursing homes. They were 24.3% (21.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 11.8 to 30.8 percentage points; P < .001), 30.7% (27.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 17.7 to 36.2 percentage points; P < .001), and 29.2% (25.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 16.1 to 35.3 percentage points; P < .001) more likely to have a 1-week supply of medical gowns than PE-owned nursing homes. Government nursing homes were more likely to have a shortage of nurses (6.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.0 to 13.9 percentage points; P = .049) than PE-owned nursing homes. In this cross-sectional study, PE-owned nursing homes performed comparably on staffing levels, resident cases, and deaths with nursing homes with other types of ownership, although their shortages of PPE may warrant monitoring.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33112402
pii: 2772306
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26702
pmc: PMC7593807
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2026702Références
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jul;21(7):905-908
pubmed: 32674817
J Health Econ. 2014 Sep;37:13-24
pubmed: 24887707
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1653-1656
pubmed: 32484912
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Sep;21(9):1186-1190
pubmed: 32859298
Gerontologist. 2004 Feb;44(1):13-23
pubmed: 14978317
Health Serv Res. 2004 Apr;39(2):225-50
pubmed: 15032952
Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct;48(5):1617-33
pubmed: 23521571
JAMA. 2020 Sep 15;324(11):1103-1105
pubmed: 32790822
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun 18;:
pubmed: 32557542
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Jul-Sep;38(3):224-33
pubmed: 22609748
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Aug;20(8):995-1000.e4
pubmed: 30579920
Inquiry. 2017 Jan-Dec;54:46958017742761
pubmed: 29161948
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug 8;:
pubmed: 32770832
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jul;21(7):1001-1003
pubmed: 32674812
JAMA. 2020 Jul 7;324(1):23-24
pubmed: 32442303
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 1):106-28
pubmed: 22091627
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2019 Dec;19(3-4):273-299
pubmed: 30357589
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 2;171(1):78
pubmed: 31261393
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2020 Aug;21(3):174-186
pubmed: 32635838
Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):579-610
pubmed: 18070331
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct;27(5):1399-408
pubmed: 18780930