Comparative Performance of Private Equity-Owned US Nursing Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2020
Historique:
entrez: 28 10 2020
pubmed: 29 10 2020
medline: 6 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

It is not known whether nursing homes with private equity (PE) ownership have performed better or worse than other nursing homes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To evaluate the comparative performance of PE-owned nursing homes on COVID-19 outcomes. This cross-sectional study of 11 470 US nursing homes used the Nursing Home COVID-19 Public File from May 17, 2020, to July 2, 2020, to compare outcomes of PE-owned nursing homes with for-profit, nonprofit, and government-owned homes, adjusting for facility characteristics. Nursing home ownership status. Self-reported number of COVID-19 cases and deaths and deaths by any cause per 1000 residents; possessing 1-week supplies of personal protective equipment (PPE); staffing shortages. Of 11 470 nursing homes, 7793 (67.9%) were for-profit; 2523 (22.0%), nonprofit; 511 (5.3%), government-owned; and 543 (4.7%), PE-owned; with mean (SD) COVID-19 cases per 1000 residents of 88.3 [2.1], 67.0 [3.8], 39.8 [7.6] and 110.8 [8.1], respectively. Mean (SD) COVID-19 deaths per 1000 residents were 61.9 [1.6], 66.4 [3.0], 56.2 [7.3], and 78.9 [5.9], respectively; mean deaths by any cause per 1000 residents were 78.1 [1.3], 91.5 [2.2], 67.6 [4.5], and 87.9 [4.8], respectively. In adjusted analyses, government-owned homes had 35.5 (95% CI, -69.2 to -1.8; P = .03) fewer COVID-19 cases per 1000 residents than PE-owned nursing homes. Cases in PE-owned nursing homes were not statistically different compared with for-profit and nonprofit facilities; nor were there statistically significant differences in COVID-19 deaths or deaths by any cause between PE-owned nursing homes and for-profit, nonprofit, and government-owned facilities. For-profit, nonprofit, and government-owned nursing homes were 10.5% (9.1 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.8 to 16.3 percentage points; P = .006), 15.0% (13.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 5.5 to 20.6 percentage points; P < .001), and 17.0% (14.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 6.5 to 23.0 percentage points; P < .001), respectively, more likely to have at least a 1-week supply of N95 masks than PE-owned nursing homes. They were 24.3% (21.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 11.8 to 30.8 percentage points; P < .001), 30.7% (27.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 17.7 to 36.2 percentage points; P < .001), and 29.2% (25.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 16.1 to 35.3 percentage points; P < .001) more likely to have a 1-week supply of medical gowns than PE-owned nursing homes. Government nursing homes were more likely to have a shortage of nurses (6.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.0 to 13.9 percentage points; P = .049) than PE-owned nursing homes. In this cross-sectional study, PE-owned nursing homes performed comparably on staffing levels, resident cases, and deaths with nursing homes with other types of ownership, although their shortages of PPE may warrant monitoring.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33112402
pii: 2772306
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26702
pmc: PMC7593807
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2026702

Références

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jul;21(7):905-908
pubmed: 32674817
J Health Econ. 2014 Sep;37:13-24
pubmed: 24887707
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1653-1656
pubmed: 32484912
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Sep;21(9):1186-1190
pubmed: 32859298
Gerontologist. 2004 Feb;44(1):13-23
pubmed: 14978317
Health Serv Res. 2004 Apr;39(2):225-50
pubmed: 15032952
Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct;48(5):1617-33
pubmed: 23521571
JAMA. 2020 Sep 15;324(11):1103-1105
pubmed: 32790822
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun 18;:
pubmed: 32557542
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Jul-Sep;38(3):224-33
pubmed: 22609748
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Aug;20(8):995-1000.e4
pubmed: 30579920
Inquiry. 2017 Jan-Dec;54:46958017742761
pubmed: 29161948
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug 8;:
pubmed: 32770832
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jul;21(7):1001-1003
pubmed: 32674812
JAMA. 2020 Jul 7;324(1):23-24
pubmed: 32442303
Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb;47(1 Pt 1):106-28
pubmed: 22091627
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2019 Dec;19(3-4):273-299
pubmed: 30357589
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 2;171(1):78
pubmed: 31261393
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2020 Aug;21(3):174-186
pubmed: 32635838
Milbank Q. 2007 Dec;85(4):579-610
pubmed: 18070331
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct;27(5):1399-408
pubmed: 18780930

Auteurs

Robert Tyler Braun (RT)

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Hyunkyung Yun (H)

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Lawrence P Casalino (LP)

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Zachary Myslinski (Z)

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Farai M Kuwonza (FM)

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Hye-Young Jung (HY)

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Mark Aaron Unruh (MA)

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH