Patients' and parents' perspectives of and experiences with assessing nursing students' paediatric clinical practice.
formative assessment
healthcare education
nursing students
paediatric
patient involvement
Journal
Journal of clinical nursing
ISSN: 1365-2702
Titre abrégé: J Clin Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9207302
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
31
07
2020
revised:
09
10
2020
accepted:
14
10
2020
pubmed:
29
10
2020
medline:
4
6
2021
entrez:
28
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To explore patients' and parents' involvement in the formative assessment of undergraduate nursing students' paediatric clinical practice. We conducted semi-structured interviews with paediatric patients between 14 to 18 years old and parents who received care from a nursing student while admitted to a paediatric tertiary care hospital in Canada. We analysed the data using qualitative content analysis as well as Lincoln and Guba's criteria for establishing trustworthiness. The Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) checklist was completed for the quality appraisal of this article. Three categories emerged from the data: 1) how patients and parents are currently involved in the formative assessment of nursing students' paediatric clinical practice; 2) how patients and parents would prefer to be involved in the formative assessment of nursing students' paediatric clinical practice; and 3) the potential benefits and challenges of involving patients and parents in the formative assessment of nursing students' paediatric clinical practice. This study provided an understanding of patients' and parents' past encounters with nursing students and the elements of care that they have assessed as well as those that they would prefer to assess and provide feedback on, while considering the potential benefits and challenges of their involvement. The findings of this study will assist clinical instructors in determining how and when to involve patients and parents in the assessment of nursing students. Academic institutions offering nursing programmes should consider the study findings when improving or changing formative assessment strategies.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
217-228Subventions
Organisme : University of Ottawa
Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Archer, J. (2010). State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Medical Education, 44(1), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x
Atkinson, S., & Williams, P. (2011). The involvement of service users in nursing students’ education. Learning Disability Practice, 14(3), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.7748/ldp2011.04.14.3.18.c8441
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The Characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85(5), 536-553. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1022
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nursing plus Open, 2(C), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
Bourbonnais, F. F., Langford, S., & Giannantonio, L. (2008). Development of a clinical evaluation tool for baccalaureate nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2007.06.005
Casey, D., & Clark, L. (2014). Involving patients in the assessment of nursing students. Nursing Standard, 28(47), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.28.47.37.e8164
Coleman, K., & Murray, E. (2002). Patients’ views and feelings on the community-based teaching of undergraduate medical students: A qualitative study. Family Practice, 19(2), 183-188. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/19.2.183
College of Nurses of Ontario (CNO) (2014). Practice reflection: Learning from practice. Retrieved from http://www.cno.org/globalassets/4-learnaboutstandardsandguidelines/prac/learn/teleconferences/practice-reflection-learning-from-practice.pdf
Collins, H. (2014). Are We All Scientific Experts Now? Polity Press.
Creswell, J., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Debyser, B., Grypdonck, M. H., Defloor, T., & Verhaeghe, S. T. (2011). Involvement of inpatient mental health clients in the practical training and assessment of mental health nursing students: Can it benefit clients and students? Nurse Education Today, 31(2), 198-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.001
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. SAGE Open, 4(1).
Epstein, R. M. (2007). Assessment in medical education. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356(4), 387-396. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054784
Forrest, S., Risk, I., Masters, H., & Brown, N. (2000). Mental health service user involvement in nurse education: Exploring the issues. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 7(1), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2850.2000.00262.x
Graneheim, U., Lindgren, B., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
Haycock-Stuart, E., Donaghy, E., & Darbyshire, C. (2016). Involving users and carers in the assessment of preregistration nursing students’ clinical nursing practice: a strategy for patient empowerment and quality improvement? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(13-14), 2052-2065. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13279
Hickey, G., & Kipping, C. (1998). Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health trough a participation continuum. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7(1), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00122.x
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Loiselle, C. (2011). Canadian essentials of nursing research, (3rd ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
McAndrew, S., & Samociuk, G. A. (2003). Reflecting together: developing a new strategy for continuous user involvement. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 10(5), 616-621. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2850.2003.t01-1-00609.x
Moreau, K. A., Eady, K., Frank, J. R., Hamstra, S. J., Karwowska, A., Murnaghan, A., Pound, C. M., Tse, S., & Jabbour, M. (2016). A qualitative exploration of which resident skills parents in pediatric emergency departments can assess. Medical Teacher, 38(11), 1118-1124. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170783
Moreau, K., Pound, C., & Eady, K. (2015). Pediatric caregiver involvement in the assessment of physicians. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0402-6
Morris, P., Dalton, E., McGoverin, A., & Symons, J. (2010). Preparing for patient centred practice: developing the patient voice in health professional learning. In H. Bradbury, N. Frost, S. Kilminster, & M. Zukas (Eds.), Beyond Reflective Practice: New Approaches to Professional Lifelong Learning (pp. 104-119). Routledge.
Price, J. (2004). A parent in the classroom-a valuable way of fostering deep learning for the children’s nursing student. Nurse Education in Practice, 4, 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-5953(03)00005-2
Rauf, A., Shamim, M. S., Aly, S. M., Chundrigar, T., & Alam, S. N. (2014). Formative assessment in undergraduate medical education: concept, implementation and hurdles. JPMA. The. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 64(1), 72-75.
Rees, C. E., Knight, L. V., & Wilkinson, C. E. (2007). User involvement is a sine qua non, almost, in medical education: learning with rather than just about health and social care service users. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice., 12(3), 359-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9007-5
Rhodes, C. (2013). Service user involvement in pre-registration children’s nursing education: the impact and influence on practice: a case study on the student perspective. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 36, 291-308. https://doi.org/10.3109/01460862.2013.830161
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334:AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
Speers, J. (2008). Service user involvement in the assessment of a practice competency in mental health nursing-stakeholders’ views and recommendations. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(2), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2007.04.002
Stickley, T., Stacey, G., Pollock, K., Smith, A., Betinis, J., & Fairbank, S. (2011). Developing a service user designed tool for the assessment of student mental health nurses in practice: A collaborative process. Nurse Education Today, 31(1), 102-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.04.005
Suikkala, A., Koskinen, S., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2018). Patients’ involvement in nursing students’ clinical education: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 84, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.010
Thomas, E., & Magilvy, J. K. (2011). Qualitative rigour or research validity in qualitative research. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, JSPN, 16(2), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00283.x
Thorne, S. (2016). Interpretive description: qualitative research for applied practice, (2nd ed.). Left Coast Press.
Towle, A., Bainbridge, L., Godolphin, W., Katz, A., Kline, C., Lown, B., Madularu, I., Solomon, P., & Thistlethwaite, J. (2010). Active patient involvement in the education of health professionals. Medical Education, 44(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03530.x
Towle, A., Farrell, C., Gaines, M., Godolphin, W., John, G., Kline, C., & Thistlethwaite, J. (2016). The patient's voice in health and social care professional education. Clinical Governance, 21(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHG-01-2016-0003
Whittemore, R., Chase, S., & Mandle, C. (2001). Validity in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119299