Host phylogeny matters: Examining sources of variation in infection risk by blood parasites across a tropical montane bird community in India.
Avian haemosporidians
Ecological traits
Haemoproteus
Host phylogeny
India
Infection dynamics
Plasmodium
Western Ghats
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Oct 2020
28 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
01
06
2020
accepted:
14
10
2020
entrez:
29
10
2020
pubmed:
30
10
2020
medline:
4
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Identifying patterns and drivers of infection risk among host communities is crucial to elucidate disease dynamics and predict infectious disease risk in wildlife populations. Blood parasites of the genera Plasmodium and Haemoproteus are a diverse group of vector-borne protozoan parasites that affect bird populations globally. Despite their widespread distribution and exceptional diversity, factors underlying haemosporidian infection risk in wild bird communities remain poorly understood. While some studies have examined variation in avian haemosporidian risk, researchers have primarily focused on host ecological traits without considering host phylogenetic relationships. In this study, we employ a phylogenetically informed approach to examine the association between host ecological traits and haemosporidian infection risk in endemic bird communities in the Western Ghats Sky Islands. We used parasite sequence data based on partial mitochondrial cytochrome b gene, that was amplified from genomic DNA extracted from 1177 birds (28 species) across the Western Ghats to assess infection of birds with haemosporidian parasites. We employed a Bayesian phylogenetic mixed effect modelling approach to test whether haemosporidian infection risk was affected by seven species-specific and four individual-level ecological predictors. We also examined the effect of host phylogenetic relationships on the observed patterns of variation in haemosporidian infection risk by estimating phylogenetic signal. Our study shows that host ecological traits and host phylogeny differentially influence infection risk by Plasmodium (generalist parasite) and Haemoproteus (specialist parasite). For Plasmodium, we found that sociality, sexual dimorphism and foraging strata were important ecological predictors. For Haemoproteus, patterns of infection risk among host species were associated with sociality, species elevation and individual body condition. Interestingly, variance in infection risk explained by host phylogeny was higher for Haemoproteus parasites compared to Plasmodium. Our study highlights that while host ecological traits promoting parasite exposure and host susceptibility are important determinants of infection risk, host phylogeny also contributes substantially to predicting patterns of haemosporidian infection risk in multi-host communities. Importantly, infection risk is driven by joint contributions of host ecology and host phylogeny and studying these effects together could increase our ability to better understand the drivers of infection risk and predict future disease threats.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Identifying patterns and drivers of infection risk among host communities is crucial to elucidate disease dynamics and predict infectious disease risk in wildlife populations. Blood parasites of the genera Plasmodium and Haemoproteus are a diverse group of vector-borne protozoan parasites that affect bird populations globally. Despite their widespread distribution and exceptional diversity, factors underlying haemosporidian infection risk in wild bird communities remain poorly understood. While some studies have examined variation in avian haemosporidian risk, researchers have primarily focused on host ecological traits without considering host phylogenetic relationships. In this study, we employ a phylogenetically informed approach to examine the association between host ecological traits and haemosporidian infection risk in endemic bird communities in the Western Ghats Sky Islands.
METHODS
METHODS
We used parasite sequence data based on partial mitochondrial cytochrome b gene, that was amplified from genomic DNA extracted from 1177 birds (28 species) across the Western Ghats to assess infection of birds with haemosporidian parasites. We employed a Bayesian phylogenetic mixed effect modelling approach to test whether haemosporidian infection risk was affected by seven species-specific and four individual-level ecological predictors. We also examined the effect of host phylogenetic relationships on the observed patterns of variation in haemosporidian infection risk by estimating phylogenetic signal.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our study shows that host ecological traits and host phylogeny differentially influence infection risk by Plasmodium (generalist parasite) and Haemoproteus (specialist parasite). For Plasmodium, we found that sociality, sexual dimorphism and foraging strata were important ecological predictors. For Haemoproteus, patterns of infection risk among host species were associated with sociality, species elevation and individual body condition. Interestingly, variance in infection risk explained by host phylogeny was higher for Haemoproteus parasites compared to Plasmodium.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our study highlights that while host ecological traits promoting parasite exposure and host susceptibility are important determinants of infection risk, host phylogeny also contributes substantially to predicting patterns of haemosporidian infection risk in multi-host communities. Importantly, infection risk is driven by joint contributions of host ecology and host phylogeny and studying these effects together could increase our ability to better understand the drivers of infection risk and predict future disease threats.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33115505
doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04404-8
pii: 10.1186/s13071-020-04404-8
pmc: PMC7594458
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Protozoan
0
Cytochromes b
9035-37-4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
536Subventions
Organisme : U.S. Department of Energy
ID : DE-EM0004391
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):e0184587
pubmed: 28880919
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 20;9(6):e100695
pubmed: 24950223
PLoS Pathog. 2014 May 29;10(5):e1004015
pubmed: 24875394
J Genet. 2020;99:
pubmed: 33622992
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 May;20(5):238-44
pubmed: 16701375
Science. 2010 Aug 6;329(5992):676-9
pubmed: 20689015
Evol Appl. 2014 Aug;7(7):799-811
pubmed: 25469161
Am Nat. 2005 Apr;165(4):466-80
pubmed: 15791538
Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):853-8
pubmed: 10706275
Parasitology. 2015 Nov;142(13):1612-20
pubmed: 26394656
Ecohealth. 2013 Dec;10(4):366-75
pubmed: 24430825
J Evol Biol. 2008 Nov;21(6):1504-13
pubmed: 18823451
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 08;10(4):e0121254
pubmed: 25853491
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jul;84(4):985-98
pubmed: 25704868
Parasitology. 2013 Apr;140(5):672-82
pubmed: 23361092
Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:307-40
pubmed: 10761580
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 7;276(1666):2345-6; discussion 2347-9
pubmed: 19364748
Heredity (Edinb). 2005 Jan;94(1):71-80
pubmed: 15454948
Ecol Lett. 2012 Mar;15(3):235-42
pubmed: 22221837
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Nov 4;111(44):15780-5
pubmed: 25331868
Int J Parasitol. 2009 Jan;39(2):257-66
pubmed: 18713636
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Mar;84(2):487-97
pubmed: 25283218
Ecology. 2016 Apr;97(4):940-50
pubmed: 27220210
J Evol Biol. 2010 Mar;23(3):494-508
pubmed: 20070460
Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Jan;25(1):21-7
pubmed: 19782425
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Apr 5;370(1665):
pubmed: 25688012
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 7;282(1810):
pubmed: 26085588
Science. 2013 Aug 2;341(6145):514-9
pubmed: 23908230
Nature. 1999 Oct 28;401(6756):877-84
pubmed: 10553904
J Parasitol. 2010 Apr;96(2):318-24
pubmed: 20001096
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Apr 17;280(1760):20122947
pubmed: 23595266
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jul 7;271(1546):1363-70
pubmed: 15306334
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jun 12;286(1904):20190439
pubmed: 31161909
J Parasitol. 2013 Oct;99(5):903-5
pubmed: 23517316
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1249:211-26
pubmed: 22320256
Curr Biol. 2019 Nov 18;29(22):3946-3952.e5
pubmed: 31679930
PLoS Pathog. 2011 Sep;7(9):e1002260
pubmed: 21966271
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 15;28(12):1647-9
pubmed: 22543367
Ecol Lett. 2019 Mar;22(3):547-557
pubmed: 30637890
Science. 2015 Jan 23;347(6220):436-8
pubmed: 25613889
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Aug 17;283(1836):
pubmed: 27534957
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jul 17;6(7):182197
pubmed: 31417708
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39208
pubmed: 22723966
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Aug;20(8):2406-16
pubmed: 24488566
J Parasitol. 2012 Apr;98(2):388-97
pubmed: 21992108
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 21;100(2):567-71
pubmed: 12525705
Parasit Vectors. 2013 May 07;6:139
pubmed: 23648230
Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):384-7
pubmed: 7123238
Ecol Lett. 2018 Dec;21(12):1869-1884
pubmed: 30369000
Int J Parasitol. 2014 Apr;44(5):329-38
pubmed: 24556563
Int J Parasitol. 2016 Jan;46(1):41-9
pubmed: 26348660
Am Nat. 2013 May;181(5):674-89
pubmed: 23594550
J Wildl Dis. 2003 Jan;39(1):170-8
pubmed: 12685081
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Aug;88(8):1226-1239
pubmed: 31002193
J Anim Ecol. 2011 Nov;80(6):1196-206
pubmed: 21426343
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Nov;19(11):3245-53
pubmed: 23606561
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012 Nov;87(4):928-64
pubmed: 22616880
Ecol Lett. 2019 Jun;22(6):987-998
pubmed: 30912262
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2013 May 15;2:178-89
pubmed: 24533333
Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Sep;9(5):1353-8
pubmed: 21564906
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Sep 22;273(1599):2327-33
pubmed: 16928635
J Parasitol. 2004 Aug;90(4):797-802
pubmed: 15357072
Med Vet Entomol. 2011 Mar;25(1):104-8
pubmed: 20497315
J Anim Ecol. 2014 Nov;83(6):1387-97
pubmed: 24810878