Tailored implementation of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy in the multinational context of the ImpleMentAll project: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.
Determinants of practice
Implementation strategies
Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Mental health
Normalization
SWT
Stepped wedge trial design
Tailored implementation
eHealth
iCBT
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Oct 2020
28 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
03
02
2020
accepted:
14
08
2020
entrez:
29
10
2020
pubmed:
30
10
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) is found effective in treating common mental disorders. However, the use of these interventions in routine care is limited. The international ImpleMentAll study is funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme. It is concerned with studying and improving methods for implementing evidence-based iCBT services for common mental disorders in routine mental health care. A digitally accessible implementation toolkit (ItFits-toolkit) will be introduced to mental health care organizations with the aim to facilitate the ongoing implementation of iCBT services within local contexts. This study investigates the effectiveness of the ItFits-toolkit by comparing it to implementation-as-usual activities. A stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial (SWT) design will be applied. Over a trial period of 30 months, the ItFits-toolkit will be introduced sequentially in twelve routine mental health care organizations in primary and specialist care across nine countries in Europe and Australia. Repeated measures are applied to assess change over time in the outcome variables. The effectiveness of the ItFits-toolkit will be assessed in terms of the degree of normalization of the use of the iCBT services. Several exploratory outcomes including uptake of the iCBT services will be measured to feed the interpretation of the primary outcome. Data will be collected via a centralized data collection system and analysed using generalized linear mixed modelling. A qualitative process evaluation of routine implementation activities and the use of the ItFits-toolkit will be conducted within this study. The ImpleMentAll study is a large-scale international research project designed to study the effectiveness of tailored implementation. Using a SWT design that allows to examine change over time, this study will investigate the effect of tailored implementation on the normalization of the use of iCBT services and their uptake. It will provide a better understanding of the process and methods of tailoring implementation strategies. If found effective, the ItFits-toolkit will be made accessible for mental health care service providers, to help them overcome their context-specific implementation challenges. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03652883 . Retrospectively registered on 29 August 2018.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) is found effective in treating common mental disorders. However, the use of these interventions in routine care is limited. The international ImpleMentAll study is funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme. It is concerned with studying and improving methods for implementing evidence-based iCBT services for common mental disorders in routine mental health care. A digitally accessible implementation toolkit (ItFits-toolkit) will be introduced to mental health care organizations with the aim to facilitate the ongoing implementation of iCBT services within local contexts. This study investigates the effectiveness of the ItFits-toolkit by comparing it to implementation-as-usual activities.
METHODS
METHODS
A stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial (SWT) design will be applied. Over a trial period of 30 months, the ItFits-toolkit will be introduced sequentially in twelve routine mental health care organizations in primary and specialist care across nine countries in Europe and Australia. Repeated measures are applied to assess change over time in the outcome variables. The effectiveness of the ItFits-toolkit will be assessed in terms of the degree of normalization of the use of the iCBT services. Several exploratory outcomes including uptake of the iCBT services will be measured to feed the interpretation of the primary outcome. Data will be collected via a centralized data collection system and analysed using generalized linear mixed modelling. A qualitative process evaluation of routine implementation activities and the use of the ItFits-toolkit will be conducted within this study.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The ImpleMentAll study is a large-scale international research project designed to study the effectiveness of tailored implementation. Using a SWT design that allows to examine change over time, this study will investigate the effect of tailored implementation on the normalization of the use of iCBT services and their uptake. It will provide a better understanding of the process and methods of tailoring implementation strategies. If found effective, the ItFits-toolkit will be made accessible for mental health care service providers, to help them overcome their context-specific implementation challenges.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03652883 . Retrospectively registered on 29 August 2018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33115545
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04686-4
pii: 10.1186/s13063-020-04686-4
pmc: PMC7592568
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03652883']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
893Subventions
Organisme : H2020 Health
ID : 733025
Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : 1142363
Investigateurs
Alison Calear
(A)
Andia Meksi
(A)
Anna Sofie Rømer
(AS)
Anne Etzelmüller
(A)
Antoine Yrondi
(A)
Arlinda Cerga-Pashoja
(A)
Bridianne O'Dea
(B)
Bruno Aouizerate
(B)
Carl May
(C)
Carmen Ceinos
(C)
Caroline Oehler
(C)
Catherine Pope
(C)
Christiaan Vis
(C)
Claire van Genugten
(C)
Claus Duedal Pedersen
(CD)
Corinna Gumbmann
(C)
David Daniel Ebert
(DD)
Denise Hanssen
(D)
Els Dozeman
(E)
Enrico Zanalda
(E)
Erik Van der Eycken
(E)
Eva Fris
(E)
Gentiana Qirjako
(G)
Géraldine Visentin
(G)
Heleen Riper
(H)
Helen Christensen
(H)
Ingrid Titzler
(I)
Isabel Zbukvic
(I)
Jeroen Ruwaard
(J)
Johanna Freund
(J)
Johannes H Smit
(JH)
Jordi Piera-Jiménez
(J)
Josep Penya
(J)
Josien Schuurmans
(J)
Judith Rosmalen
(J)
Juliane Hug
(J)
Kim Mathiasen
(K)
Kristian Kidholm
(K)
Kristine Tarp
(K)
Leah Bührmann
(L)
Ludovic Samalin
(L)
Maite Arrillaga
(M)
Margot Fleuren
(M)
Marion Leboyeer
(M)
Martine Pool
(M)
Mette Atipei Craggs
(MA)
Mette Maria Skjøth
(MM)
Naim Fanaj
(N)
Philip J Batterham
(PJ)
Pia Driessen
(P)
Robin Kok
(R)
Sebastian Potthoff
(S)
Sergi García Redondo
(SG)
Sevim Mustafa
(S)
Tim Rapley
(T)
Tracy Finch
(T)
Ulrich Hegerl
(U)
Ylenia Sacco
(Y)
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 29;(4):CD005470
pubmed: 25923419
Res Soc Work Pract. 2014 Mar 1;24(2):192-212
pubmed: 24791131
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 31;18(8):e234
pubmed: 27582341
Implement Sci. 2009 Oct 19;4:67
pubmed: 19840381
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2009 Jan-Mar;18(1):23-33
pubmed: 19378696
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 10;9:7
pubmed: 24410955
Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(3):233-7
pubmed: 10259963
BMJ. 2015 Feb 06;350:h391
pubmed: 25662947
Implement Sci. 2014 Sep 04;9:118
pubmed: 25185799
Implement Sci. 2014 Dec 02;9:173
pubmed: 25443652
Implement Sci. 2015 Nov 04;10:155
pubmed: 26537706
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep 10;16(9):e208
pubmed: 25208886
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:255-74
pubmed: 24641560
Internet Interv. 2018 Feb 06;11:60-70
pubmed: 30135761
Implement Sci. 2017 Jan 10;12(1):5
pubmed: 28069029
BMJ. 2008 Nov 17;337:a2448
pubmed: 19015186
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):182-91
pubmed: 16829207
Implement Sci. 2011 Sep 07;6:103
pubmed: 21899753
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Mar 16;5(1):e20
pubmed: 29549072
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Oct;25(10):503-13
pubmed: 10522231
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 01;74(4):351-359
pubmed: 28241179
J Affect Disord. 2017 Dec 1;223:28-40
pubmed: 28715726
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Feb;78:26-33
pubmed: 23246396
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):21-37
pubmed: 26162113
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 29;21(10):e14261
pubmed: 31663855
Med Care Res Rev. 2012 Apr;69(2):123-57
pubmed: 22203646
Internet Interv. 2018 Jan 16;12:150-164
pubmed: 30135779
Implement Sci. 2014 Aug 12;9:102
pubmed: 25112492
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 12;17(1):331
pubmed: 28899365
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 May 1;90(5):357-64
pubmed: 22589569
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 20;21(2):e12376
pubmed: 30785402
Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;75(4):353-362
pubmed: 30151938
Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:352
pubmed: 26279154
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629
pubmed: 15595944
Cogn Behav Ther. 2018 Jan;47(1):1-18
pubmed: 29215315
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):135
pubmed: 30442094
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
Implement Sci. 2009 Apr 07;4:18
pubmed: 19351400
Eval Program Plann. 1979;2(3):197-207
pubmed: 10245370
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e006773
pubmed: 25869685
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):133
pubmed: 30442093
Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 4;13(1):146
pubmed: 30509289
Am Psychol. 2010 Feb-Mar;65(2):73-84
pubmed: 20141263
Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 13;8:18
pubmed: 23406398
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014 Jan;23 Suppl 1:58-91
pubmed: 24375536
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 19;11(1):141
pubmed: 27756414
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Jul;63:80-92
pubmed: 29940401
BMJ. 2018 Nov 9;363:k1614
pubmed: 30413417