Body mass index and gestational weight gain in migrant women by birth regions compared with Swedish-born women: A registry linkage study of 0.5 million pregnancies.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
07
09
2020
accepted:
13
10
2020
entrez:
29
10
2020
pubmed:
30
10
2020
medline:
16
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Women migrating to high-income countries may have increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes as compared with native-born women. However, little is known whether migrant women are more likely to have unhealthy body mass index (BMI) or gestational weight gain (GWG), which is of importance considering the well-established links between unhealthy BMI and GWG with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Hence, the aim of the study was to examine the prevalence and estimate odds ratios (ORs) of underweight and obesity in the first trimester as well as inadequate and excessive GWG across birth regions in migrant (first-generation) and Swedish-born women in a population-based sample of pregnant women in Sweden. This population-based study included 535 609 pregnancies from the Swedish Pregnancy Register between the years 2010-2018. This register has a coverage of approximately 90% and includes data on body weight, height, birth country and educational attainment. BMI in the first trimester of pregnancy was classified as underweight, normal weight, overweight and obesity whereas GWG was classified as inadequate, adequate and excessive according to the recommendations from the National Academy of Medicine, USA. BMI and GWG were examined according to 7 birth regions and the 100 individual birth countries. Adjusted ORs of underweight, obesity as well as inadequate or excessive GWG by birth regions were estimated using multinomial logistic regression. There were large disparities in unhealthy BMI and GWG across birth regions. For instance, women born in North Africa and Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa had 1.40 (95% CI 1.35-1.44) and 2.13 (95% CI 2.03-2.23) higher odds of obesity compared with women born in Sweden. However, women born in Sub-Saharan Africa had also considerably higher odds of underweight (OR, 2.93 [95% CI 2.70-3.18]) and inadequate GWG (OR, 1.97 [95% CI 1.87-2.07]). The limitations of the study include the lack of a validated measure of acculturation and that the study only had data on first-generation migration. The large differences across the 7 regions and 100 countries highlights the importance of considering birth region and country-specific risks of unhealthy BMI and GWG in first-generation migrant women. Furthermore, inadequate GWG was common among pregnant first-generation migrant women, especially in women born in Sub-Saharan Africa, which demonstrates the need to promote adequate GWG, not only the avoidance of excessive GWG. Thus, our findings also indicate that additional support and interventions may be needed for first-generation migrant women from certain birth regions and countries in order to tackle the observed disparities in unhealthy BMI and GWG. Although further studies are needed, our results are useful for identifying groups of women at increased risk of unhealthy BMI and weight gain during pregnancy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33119672
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241319
pii: PONE-D-20-28098
pmc: PMC7595374
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0241319Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Marcus Bendtsen owns a private company that develops and distributes lifestyle interventions to be used in health care settings although this company has no link to this study. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Références
PeerJ. 2018 Aug 27;6:e5407
pubmed: 30186674
J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Dec 20;41(4):e290-e299
pubmed: 30895289
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 01;15:315
pubmed: 25886465
BMJ. 2017 Feb 8;356:j1
pubmed: 28179267
Curr Obes Rep. 2017 Sep;6(3):314-323
pubmed: 28755178
BMJ. 2016 Feb 29;352:i555
pubmed: 26926301
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 12;16(1):89
pubmed: 29890984
Obes Rev. 2016 Nov;17(11):1091-1102
pubmed: 27536879
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):466-476
pubmed: 29172245
J Immigr Minor Health. 2017 Dec;19(6):1469-1487
pubmed: 27553259
Clin Obes. 2012 Oct;2(5-6):150-9
pubmed: 25586250
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Oct;193:51-60
pubmed: 26232727
Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2627-2642
pubmed: 29029897
BJOG. 2012 Feb;119(3):283-90
pubmed: 22168897
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug 30;14:364
pubmed: 25175811
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Oct;25(5):839-44
pubmed: 25868566
Lancet. 2013 Apr 6;381(9873):1235-45
pubmed: 23541058
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Jul;20(7):1485-96
pubmed: 26979613
Lancet. 2018 Dec 15;392(10164):2606-2654
pubmed: 30528486
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Apr 26;16:86
pubmed: 27113930
Int J Public Health. 2018 Dec;63(9):1027-1036
pubmed: 30097678
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 10;13:458
pubmed: 23663279
J Obes. 2019 Feb 10;2019:2419263
pubmed: 30881701
Scand J Public Health. 2017 May;45(3):314-321
pubmed: 28443493
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;125(4):773-81
pubmed: 25751216
JAMA. 2017 Jun 6;317(21):2207-2225
pubmed: 28586887
Int J Obes (Lond). 2010 Mar;34(3):420-8
pubmed: 20029373
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1995-2051
pubmed: 30496106
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 May;21(5):1046-55
pubmed: 23784909