Effect of setup error in the single-isocenter technique on stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases.
multiple brain metastases
setup error
single-isocenter technique
stereotactic radiosurgery
volumetric modulated arc therapy
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
25
03
2020
revised:
25
08
2020
accepted:
06
10
2020
pubmed:
30
10
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
29
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In conventional stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), treatment of multiple brain metastases using multiple isocenters is time-consuming resulting in long dose delivery times for patients. A single-isocenter technique has been developed which enables the simultaneous irradiation of multiple targets at one isocenter. This technique requires accurate positioning of the patient to ensure optimal dose coverage. We evaluated the effect of six degrees of freedom (6DoF) setup errors in patient setups on SRS dose distributions for multiple brain metastases using a single-isocenter technique. We used simulated spherical gross tumor volumes (GTVs) with diameters ranging from 1.0 to 3.0 cm. The distance from the isocenter to the target's center was varied from 0 to 15 cm. We created dose distributions so that each target was entirely covered by 100% of the prescribed dose. The target's position vectors were rotated from 0°-2.0° and translated from 0-1.0 mm with respect to the three axes in space. The reduction in dose coverage for the targets for each setup error was calculated and compared with zero setup error. The calculated margins for the GTV necessary to satisfy the tolerance values for loss of GTV coverage of 3% to 10% were defined as coverage-based margins. In addition, the maximum isocenter to target distance for different 6DoF setup errors was calculated to satisfy the tolerance values. The dose coverage reduction and coverage-based margins increased as the target diameter decreased, and the distance and 6DoF setup error increased. An increase in setup error when a single-isocenter technique is used may increase the risk of missing the tumor; this risk increases with increasing distance from the isocenter and decreasing tumor size.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33119953
doi: 10.1002/acm2.13081
pmc: PMC7769381
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
155-165Subventions
Organisme : KAKENHI
ID : 19K17227
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 19K17227
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jul;112(1):128-32
pubmed: 24997990
J Neurooncol. 2018 Jan;136(1):207-212
pubmed: 29098569
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Jun;194(6):560-569
pubmed: 29349605
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Apr 24;7:63
pubmed: 22531060
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Oct 1;72(2):575-81
pubmed: 18793960
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Dec 1;93(5):1154-61
pubmed: 26581151
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jan 1;91(1):100-8
pubmed: 25442342
Neuro Oncol. 2013 Sep;15(9):1257-63
pubmed: 23814264
Radiat Oncol. 2011 May 15;6:48
pubmed: 21575163
PLoS One. 2017 May 19;12(5):e0177798
pubmed: 28542254
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Mar;19(2):176-183
pubmed: 29476588
Med Phys. 2017 Jun;44(6):2115-2123
pubmed: 28382761
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 28;11(3):e0151709
pubmed: 27019082
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Dec 18;14(1):231
pubmed: 31852497
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Feb 02;11:13
pubmed: 26831367
Neurosurgery. 2014 Oct;75(4):409-17; discussion 417-8
pubmed: 24871143
Med Phys. 2017 Oct;44(10):5001-5009
pubmed: 28731267
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 1;70(3):766-72
pubmed: 18262089
J Neurooncol. 2013 Nov;115(2):217-23
pubmed: 23929592
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Mar 06;15(2):4418
pubmed: 24710431
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 5;13(1):38
pubmed: 29506539
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Nov 1;93(3):540-6
pubmed: 26460996
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 May - Jun;7(3):183-189
pubmed: 28477798
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Nov;19(6):149-158
pubmed: 30273444
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 30;6:34511
pubmed: 27688047
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 20;130(3):797-803
pubmed: 29676690
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Nov - Dec;8(6):475-483
pubmed: 30033144
J Neurooncol. 2015 Oct;125(1):149-56
pubmed: 26307446
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Feb 7;60(3):1237-57
pubmed: 25590229
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Sep 1;78(1):91-7
pubmed: 20096509
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Dec;93(3):602-8
pubmed: 19846229
J Biol Eng. 2014 Jun 12;8:12
pubmed: 24987457
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jul;18(4):106-115
pubmed: 28517613
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jan 1;76(1):296-302
pubmed: 19836151
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 13;9(1):4329
pubmed: 30867443
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2018;5(2):131-144
pubmed: 29657894
Phys Med. 2019 Jun;62:41-46
pubmed: 31153397