Evaluation of Concordance Between Original Death Certifications and an Expert Panel Process in the Determination of Sudden Unexplained Death in Childhood.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2020
01 10 2020
Historique:
entrez:
30
10
2020
pubmed:
31
10
2020
medline:
5
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The true incidence of sudden unexplained death in childhood (SUDC), already the fifth leading category of death among toddlers by current US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates, is potentially veiled by the varied certification processes by medicolegal investigative offices across the United States. To evaluate the frequency of SUDC incidence, understand its epidemiology, and assess the consistency of death certification among medical examiner and coroner offices in the US death investigation system. In this case series, 2 of 13 forensic pathologists (FPs) conducted masked reviews of 100 cases enrolled in the SUDC Registry and Research Collaborative (SUDCRRC). Children who died aged 11 months to 18 years from 36 US states, Canada, and the United Kingdom had been posthumously enrolled in the SUDCRRC by family members from 2014 to 2017. Comprehensive data from medicolegal investigative offices, clinical offices, and family members were reviewed. Data analysis was conducted from December 2014 to June 2020. Certified cause of death (COD) characterized as explained (accidental or natural) or unexplained, as determined by SUDCRRC masked review process. In this study of 100 cases of SUDC (mean [SD] age, 32.1 [31.8] months; 58 [58.0%] boys; 82 [82.0%] White children; 92 [92.0%] from the United States), the original pathologist certified 43 cases (43.0%) as explained COD and 57 (57.0%) as unexplained COD. The SUDCRRC review process led to the following certifications: 16 (16.0%) were explained, 7 (7.0%) were undetermined because of insufficient data, and 77 (77.0%) were unexplained. Experts disagreed with the original COD in 40 cases (40.0%). These data suggest that SUDC incidence is higher than the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate (ie, 392 deaths in 2018). To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive masked forensic pathology review process of sudden unexpected pediatric deaths, and it suggests that SUDC may often go unrecognized in US death investigations. Some unexpected pediatric deaths may be erroneously attributed to a natural or accidental COD, negatively affecting surveillance, research, public health funding, and medical care of surviving family members. To further address the challenges of accurate and consistent death certification in SUDC, future studies are warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33125496
pii: 2772374
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23262
pmc: PMC7599447
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2023262Références
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2019 Dec;15(4):622-628
pubmed: 31502215
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Apr;22(4):544-8
pubmed: 17372807
J Child Neurol. 2002 Jan;17 Suppl 1:S44-52
pubmed: 11918463
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192739
pubmed: 31026025
Acad Forensic Pathol. 2017 Jun;7(2):212-220
pubmed: 31239975
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2003 Dec;24(4):313-9
pubmed: 14634467
Hum Pathol. 1993 Feb;24(2):194-8
pubmed: 8432514
J Pediatr. 2016 Jul;174:84-90.e1
pubmed: 27113380
Epilepsia. 2015 Aug;56(8):1294-300
pubmed: 26120007
Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2005 May-Jun;8(3):307-19
pubmed: 16010494
Genet Med. 2016 Jul;18(7):746-9
pubmed: 26716362
Br Med J. 1964 Dec 5;2(5422):1437-9
pubmed: 14209368
Arch Dis Child. 2012 Aug;97(8):692-7
pubmed: 22685045
Am J Med. 2004 Oct 1;117(7):492-8
pubmed: 15464706
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Jan;8(1):e1008
pubmed: 31705601
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2017 Sep;1(1):8-9
pubmed: 30169231
Epilepsy Res. 2017 Jul;133:71-75
pubmed: 28456095
Pediatrics. 2016 Nov;138(5):
pubmed: 27940804