Public libraries as health literate multi-purpose workspaces for improving health literacy.


Journal

Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals
ISSN: 1036-1073
Titre abrégé: Health Promot J Austr
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9710936

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 04 08 2020
accepted: 30 10 2020
pubmed: 4 11 2020
medline: 25 2 2021
entrez: 3 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Now more than ever, in this COVID-19 pandemic, our individual and collective ability to access, understand and apply information to inform our health care and broader lifestyle decisions ie, to be health literate - has life or death consequences. This paper reflects upon the proposition of public libraries as health literate multi-purpose workspaces for improving health literacy. We draw upon our combined experiences as evaluators of organizational health literacy initiatives, and library sector development, engagement and advocacy. Key ideas were presented as part of the 2020 State Library Victoria seminar series on 'Libraries: The Heart of a Healthy Community'. Key messages included: Public libraries are well positioned to contribute to the health literacy movement, as they provide the general public with: universal free access to information and services; extensive in-house and outreach educational collaborative learning opportunities; and health and wellbeing support by being welcoming, safe, and trusted community spaces. To date, limited discussion exists about conceptualizing public libraries as health literate multi-purpose workspaces for supporting and sustaining public library health literacy efforts. A health literate organizational framework is suggested to support libraries simply supporting health information literacy to being recognised as health literate organizations. Five workspace principles (empowerment, equitable, inclusive, collaborative and integrated) are suggested to provide directions for public libraries as health literate multi-purpose workspaces for improving the health literacy of individuals, communities, organizations and indeed systems. To inform the design, implementation and evaluation of public libraries as workspaces for improving health literacy, key principles-focused evaluation questions are suggested for consideration. SO WHAT?: Public Libraries as welcoming, safe, and trusted community organizations are well placed to be health literate multipurpose workspaces for improving health literacy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33140444
doi: 10.1002/hpja.437
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

29-32

Subventions

Organisme : State Library Victoria

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Australian Health Promotion Association.

Références

Paakkari L, Okan O. COVID-19: health literacy is an underestimated problem. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(5):e249-e250.
Sørensen K, Van den Brouke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(80):12-80.
Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15:259-67.
Ratzan SC. Health literacy: communication for the public good. Health Promot Int. 2011;16:207-14.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National Statement on Health Literacy: Taking actions to improve safety and quality; 2014. [cited 2020 March 24]. Available at https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/national-statement-health-literacy-taking-action-improve-safety-and-quality
Make it Easy: A Handbook for Becoming a Health Literate Organisation; 2019. [cited 2020 March 24]. Available at http://healthwest.org.au/projects/health-literacy/
Naccarella L, Wraight B, Gorman D. Is health workforce planning recognising the dynamic interplay between health literacy at an individual, organisation and system level? Aust Health Rev. 2016;40:33-5.
Public Libraries Victoria Annual Statistics: 2017-2018. [cited 2020 June 24]. Available from https://www.plv.org.au/resources/
SGS Economics and Planning. Libraries work! The socio-economic value of public libraries to Victorians; 2018. Melbourne: State Libraries Victoria. [cited 2020 July 24]. Available from https://www.slv.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/Libraries-work.pdf
Public Libraries Victoria (2020): Libraries Change lives. [Cited 2020 June 24] https://www.plv.org.au/
Philbin MM, Parker CM, Hirsch JS, Flaherty MG. Public libraries: a community-level resource to advance population health. J Community Health. 2019;44(1):192-9.
Barr-Walker J. Health literacy and libraries: a literature review. Reference Serv Rev. 2016;44(2):191-205.
Burnham E. Libraries as partners in health literacy. J Consumer Health Internet. 2013;7(4):7-15.
Rubenstein EL. Health information and health literacy: public library practices, challenges, and opportunities. Public Library Q. 2016;35(1):49-71.
https://www.alia.org.au/news/19068/1-million-funding-consumer-health-literacy-libraries [cited 2020 June 24].
Brach C, Keller D, Hernandez LM, Baur C, Parker R, Dreyer B, et al. Ten Attributes of Health Literate Health Care Organizations. Discussion Paper; 2012. [cited 2019 December 17]. Available at: https://nam.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/BPH_Ten_HLit_Attributes.pdf
Farmanova E, Bonneville L, Bouchard L. Organizational health literacy: review of theories, frameworks, guides, and implementation issues. J Health Care Organ Provision Financing. 2018;55:1-17.
Trezona A, Dodson S, Osborne R. Development of the Organizational Health Literacy Responsiveness (Org-HLR) self-assessment tool and process. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:694.
Meggatto E, Kent F, Ward B, Keleher FH. Factors influencing implementation of organizational health literacy: a realist review. J Health Organ Manage. 2020;34 4:385-407.
CIVICA. (2016). The Intrinsic Value of Libraries as Public Spaces. [cited 2020 June 24] https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/Civica+Intrinsic+value+of+libraries+report.pdf
Patton MQ. Principles-focussed evaluation: The guide. London: The Guilford Press; 2018.
Beauchamp A, Batterham RW, Dodson S, Astbury B, Elsworth GR, McPhee C, et al. Systematic development and implementation of interventions to OPtimise Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia). BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1): https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4147-5

Auteurs

Lucio Naccarella (L)

Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Jacqui Horwood (J)

Senior Program Manager, Library Sector Engagement, State Library Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH