Annual mammographic screening to reduce breast cancer mortality in women from age 40 years: long-term follow-up of the UK Age RCT.
AGE
BREAST CANCER
MAMMOGRAPHY
SCREENING
Journal
Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
ISSN: 2046-4924
Titre abrégé: Health Technol Assess
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9706284
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
entrez:
3
11
2020
pubmed:
4
11
2020
medline:
21
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There remains disagreement on the long-term effect of mammographic screening in women aged 40-49 years. The long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial that offered annual mammography to women aged 40-49 years. The estimation of the effect of these mammograms on breast cancer and other-cause mortality, and the effect on incidence, with implications for overdiagnosis. An individually randomised controlled trial comparing offering annual mammography with offering usual care in those aged 40-48 years, and thus evaluating the effect of annual screening entirely taking place before the age of 50 years. There was follow-up for an average of 23 years for breast cancer incidence, breast cancer death and death from other causes. We analysed the mortality and incidence data by Poisson regression and estimated overdiagnosis formally using Markov process models. Twenty-three screening units in England, Wales and Scotland within the NHS Breast Screening Programme. Women aged 39-41 years were recruited between 1990 and 1997. After exclusions, a total of 53,883 women were randomised to undergo screening (the intervention group) and 106,953 women were randomised to have usual care (the control group). The intervention group was invited to an annual breast screen with film mammography, two view at first screen and single view thereafter, up to and including the calendar year of their 48th birthday. The control group received no intervention. Both groups were invited to the National Programme from the age of 50 years, when screening is offered to all women in the UK. The main outcome measures were mortality from breast cancers diagnosed during the intervention phase of the trial (i.e. before the first National Programme screen at 50 years), mortality from all breast cancers diagnosed after randomisation, all-cause mortality, mortality from causes other than breast cancer, and the incidence of breast cancer. There was a statistically significant 25% reduction in mortality from breast cancers diagnosed during the intervention phase at 10 years' follow-up (relative rate 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.97; There was 31% average non-compliance with screening and three centres had to cease screening for resource and capacity reasons. Annual mammographic screening at the age of 40-49 years resulted in a relative reduction in mortality, which was attenuated after 10 years. It is likely that digital mammography with two views at all screens, as practised now, could improve this further. There was no evidence of overdiagnosis in addition to that which already results from the National Programme carried out at later ages. There is a need for research on the effects of modern mammographic protocols and additional imaging in this age group. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN24647151. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in It is known that breast cancer screening with mammography (i.e. X-ray of the breasts) in women aged ≥ 50 years leads to a reduction in the number of deaths from breast cancer. In the UK, the NHS Breast Screening Programme offers regular screening to women aged 50–70 years. There is still some disagreement about the effect of such screening on the risk of death from breast cancer for those aged 40–49 years. There is also concern about overdiagnosis, that is, the finding of breast cancer that would not have been diagnosed in a woman’s lifetime if she had not been screened. This study recruited 160,921 women aged 39–41 years and randomly assigned one in three of the women to be offered annual mammographic screening from age 40 to 48 years. The women were followed up for occurrence of breast cancer, death from breast cancer and death from all other causes. We found that the women who were offered the screening were 25% less likely to die of breast cancer in the first 10 years in the trial. This mortality reduction was reduced with later follow-up, with a 12% reduction after an average of 23 years. There was no effect of offering screening on death from other causes. During the early years of the trial, the women offered screening had larger numbers of breast cancers diagnosed, but this excess disappeared after the first National Programme screen. This suggests that there is no overdiagnosis from screening those aged 40–49 years over and above that which already results from screening those aged ≥ 50 years.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There remains disagreement on the long-term effect of mammographic screening in women aged 40-49 years.
OBJECTIVES
The long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial that offered annual mammography to women aged 40-49 years. The estimation of the effect of these mammograms on breast cancer and other-cause mortality, and the effect on incidence, with implications for overdiagnosis.
DESIGN
An individually randomised controlled trial comparing offering annual mammography with offering usual care in those aged 40-48 years, and thus evaluating the effect of annual screening entirely taking place before the age of 50 years. There was follow-up for an average of 23 years for breast cancer incidence, breast cancer death and death from other causes. We analysed the mortality and incidence data by Poisson regression and estimated overdiagnosis formally using Markov process models.
SETTING
Twenty-three screening units in England, Wales and Scotland within the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
PARTICIPANTS
Women aged 39-41 years were recruited between 1990 and 1997. After exclusions, a total of 53,883 women were randomised to undergo screening (the intervention group) and 106,953 women were randomised to have usual care (the control group).
INTERVENTIONS
The intervention group was invited to an annual breast screen with film mammography, two view at first screen and single view thereafter, up to and including the calendar year of their 48th birthday. The control group received no intervention. Both groups were invited to the National Programme from the age of 50 years, when screening is offered to all women in the UK.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The main outcome measures were mortality from breast cancers diagnosed during the intervention phase of the trial (i.e. before the first National Programme screen at 50 years), mortality from all breast cancers diagnosed after randomisation, all-cause mortality, mortality from causes other than breast cancer, and the incidence of breast cancer.
RESULTS
There was a statistically significant 25% reduction in mortality from breast cancers diagnosed during the intervention phase at 10 years' follow-up (relative rate 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.97;
LIMITATIONS
There was 31% average non-compliance with screening and three centres had to cease screening for resource and capacity reasons.
CONCLUSIONS
Annual mammographic screening at the age of 40-49 years resulted in a relative reduction in mortality, which was attenuated after 10 years. It is likely that digital mammography with two views at all screens, as practised now, could improve this further. There was no evidence of overdiagnosis in addition to that which already results from the National Programme carried out at later ages.
FUTURE WORK
There is a need for research on the effects of modern mammographic protocols and additional imaging in this age group.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN24647151.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in
It is known that breast cancer screening with mammography (i.e. X-ray of the breasts) in women aged ≥ 50 years leads to a reduction in the number of deaths from breast cancer. In the UK, the NHS Breast Screening Programme offers regular screening to women aged 50–70 years. There is still some disagreement about the effect of such screening on the risk of death from breast cancer for those aged 40–49 years. There is also concern about overdiagnosis, that is, the finding of breast cancer that would not have been diagnosed in a woman’s lifetime if she had not been screened. This study recruited 160,921 women aged 39–41 years and randomly assigned one in three of the women to be offered annual mammographic screening from age 40 to 48 years. The women were followed up for occurrence of breast cancer, death from breast cancer and death from all other causes. We found that the women who were offered the screening were 25% less likely to die of breast cancer in the first 10 years in the trial. This mortality reduction was reduced with later follow-up, with a 12% reduction after an average of 23 years. There was no effect of offering screening on death from other causes. During the early years of the trial, the women offered screening had larger numbers of breast cancers diagnosed, but this excess disappeared after the first National Programme screen. This suggests that there is no overdiagnosis from screening those aged 40–49 years over and above that which already results from screening those aged ≥ 50 years.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
It is known that breast cancer screening with mammography (i.e. X-ray of the breasts) in women aged ≥ 50 years leads to a reduction in the number of deaths from breast cancer. In the UK, the NHS Breast Screening Programme offers regular screening to women aged 50–70 years. There is still some disagreement about the effect of such screening on the risk of death from breast cancer for those aged 40–49 years. There is also concern about overdiagnosis, that is, the finding of breast cancer that would not have been diagnosed in a woman’s lifetime if she had not been screened. This study recruited 160,921 women aged 39–41 years and randomly assigned one in three of the women to be offered annual mammographic screening from age 40 to 48 years. The women were followed up for occurrence of breast cancer, death from breast cancer and death from all other causes. We found that the women who were offered the screening were 25% less likely to die of breast cancer in the first 10 years in the trial. This mortality reduction was reduced with later follow-up, with a 12% reduction after an average of 23 years. There was no effect of offering screening on death from other causes. During the early years of the trial, the women offered screening had larger numbers of breast cancers diagnosed, but this excess disappeared after the first National Programme screen. This suggests that there is no overdiagnosis from screening those aged 40–49 years over and above that which already results from screening those aged ≥ 50 years.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33141657
doi: 10.3310/hta24550
pmc: PMC7681269
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN24647151']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-24Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 10/57/55
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Hum Pathol. 2002 Mar;33(3):365-71
pubmed: 11979379
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1998 Nov;46(5):420-6
pubmed: 9864771
J Med Screen. 2011;18(2):96-102
pubmed: 21852703
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Jan;1(1):8-14
pubmed: 17411511
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2010;37(4):278-82
pubmed: 21355457
Lancet. 2006 Dec 9;368(9552):2053-60
pubmed: 17161727
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96
pubmed: 26757170
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1599-614
pubmed: 26501536
Cancer. 2011 Feb 15;117(4):714-22
pubmed: 20882563
Radiology. 1986 Oct;161(1):37-41
pubmed: 3532183
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Mar;194(3):196-205
pubmed: 28916844
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Feb;131:202-207
pubmed: 30097250
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1773-83
pubmed: 16169887
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Feb;27(2):154-157
pubmed: 29150482
BMJ. 1995 Nov 4;311(7014):1189-93
pubmed: 7488893
Stat Med. 1997 May 15;16(9):1017-29
pubmed: 9160496
IARC Sci Publ. 1987;(82):1-406
pubmed: 3329634
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;3(11):1495-1502
pubmed: 28655029
J Med Screen. 2015 Jun;22(2):65-8
pubmed: 25767104
Br J Cancer. 2005 Mar 14;92(5):949-54
pubmed: 15726102
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):244-55
pubmed: 26756588
J Med Screen. 2016 Dec;23(4):192-202
pubmed: 26940963
Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(6):258-65
pubmed: 16457701
Int J Cancer. 1996 Dec 11;68(6):693-9
pubmed: 8980168
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Dec;46(18):3137-40
pubmed: 21036034
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1123-1132
pubmed: 26206144
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):109-14
pubmed: 26655422
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):264-270
pubmed: 29064760
Am J Prev Med. 1991 Jan-Feb;7(1):55-62
pubmed: 1867901
Hum Pathol. 2004 Oct;35(10):1252-9
pubmed: 15492993
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):168-75
pubmed: 12558355
Br J Cancer. 2008 Oct 7;99(7):1176-8
pubmed: 18766185
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Nov;19(11):2758-64
pubmed: 20837718
Circulation. 2017 May 23;135(21):1985-1987
pubmed: 28533316
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):583-9
pubmed: 23623721
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Sep;14(9):1137-1143
pubmed: 28648873
Lancet. 2003 Jul 19;362(9379):246-7
pubmed: 12885493
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Sep;21(9):1165-1172
pubmed: 32800099
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul;23(7):1159-63
pubmed: 24991022
Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1778-86
pubmed: 23117178