Incorporating patient generated health data into pharmacoepidemiological research.
big data
data privacy
digital epidemiology
mobile apps
mobile health
patient generated health data
patient reported outcomes
pharmacoepidemiology
real world data
real world evidence
social media
Journal
Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
ISSN: 1099-1557
Titre abrégé: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9208369
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
12
03
2020
revised:
17
09
2020
accepted:
31
10
2020
pubmed:
5
11
2020
medline:
25
11
2021
entrez:
4
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Epidemiology and pharmacoepidemiology frequently employ Real-World Data (RWD) from healthcare teams to inform research. These data sources usually include signs, symptoms, tests, and treatments, but may lack important information such as the patient's diet or adherence or quality of life. By harnessing digital tools a new fount of evidence, Patient (or Citizen/Person) Generated Health Data (PGHD), is becoming more readily available. This review focusses on the advantages and considerations in using PGHD for pharmacoepidemiological research. New and corroborative types of data can be collected directly from patients using digital devices, both passively and actively. Practical issues such as patient engagement, data linking, validation, and analysis are among important considerations in the use of PGHD. In our ever increasingly patient-centric world, PGHD incorporated into more traditional Real-Word data sources offers innovative opportunities to expand our understanding of the complex factors involved in health and the safety and effectiveness of disease treatments. Pharmacoepidemiologists have a unique role in realizing the potential of PGHD by ensuring that robust methodology, governance, and analytical techniques underpin its use to generate meaningful research results.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1540-1549Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Chai PR, Carreiro S, Innes BJ, et al. Digital pills to measure opioid ingestion patterns in emergency department patients with acute fracture pain:a pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:1-14. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7050.
Bazgir O, Habibi S, Palma L, Pierleoni P, Nafees S. A classification system for assessment and home monitoring of tremor in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Med Signals Sens. 2018;8:65-72.
Zhan A, Mohan S, Tarolli C, et al. Using smartphones and machine learning to quantify Parkinson disease severity the mobile Parkinson disease score. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:876-880. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0809.
Jeong T, Klabjan D, Starren J. Predictive analytics using smartphone sensors for depressive episodes. Paper presented at: 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; February 12-17, 2016; Phoenix, AZ; 2016.
O'Connor SO, Hanlon P, Donnell CAO, Garcia S, Glanville J, Mair FS. Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016;16:120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0359-3.
PCORnet. The national patient-centred clinical research network [Internet]. https://pcornet.org/participating-networks/. Cited May 3, 2019. Accesed November 11. 2020.
Druce KL, McBeth J, van der Veer SN, et al. Recruitment and ongoing engagement in a UK smartphone study examining the association between weather and pain: cohort study. JMIR mhealth uhealth. 2017;5:e168. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8162.
Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:1-14. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11.
Dorsey ER, Chan YF, Mcconnell MV, Shaw SY, Trister AD, Friend SH. The use of smartphones for health research. Acad Med. 2017;92:157-160. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001205.
Taylor S, Ferguson C, Peng F, Schoeneich M, Picard RW. Use of in-game rewards to motivate daily self-report compliance: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e11683. https://doi.org/10.2196/11683.
Ryan J, Edney S, Maher C. Engagement, compliance and retention with a gamified online social networking physical activity intervention. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7:702-708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0499-8.
Rivera D, Gokhale M, Reynolds M, et al. Linking electronic health data in pharmacoepidemiology: appropriateness and feasibility. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29:18-29.
Strom B, Kimmel S, Hennessy S. Textbook of Pharmacoepidemiology. 2nd ed. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2013.
Lin KJ, Schneeweiss S. Considerations for the analysis of longitudinal electronic health records linked to claims data to study the effectiveness and safety of drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;100:147-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.359.
Lindquist M, Galpern P. Crowdsourcing (in)voluntary citizen geospatial Data from Google android smartphones. J Digit Landsc Archit. 2016;1:263-272. https://doi.org/10.14627/537612030.264.
Casiglia E, Tikhonoff V, Albertini F, Palatini P. Poor reliability of wrist blood pressure self-measurement at home: a population-based study. Hypertension. 2016;68:896-903. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07961.
Firth J, Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, et al. The validity and value of self-reported physical activity and accelerometry in people with schizophrenia: a population-scale study of the UKbiobank. Schizophr Bull. 2017;44:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbx149.
Henriksen A, Mikalsen MH, Woldaregay AZ, et al. Using fitness trackers and smartwatches to measure physical activity in research: analysis of consumer wrist-worn wearables. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:1-30. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9157.
Byrom B, Gwaltney C, Slagle A, Gnanasakthy A, Muehlhausen W. Measurement equivalence of patient-reported outcome measures migrated to electronic formats. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018;53:426-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479018793369.
Muehlhausen W, Doll H, Quadri N, et al. Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0362-x.
White MK, Maher SM, Rizio AA, Bjorner JB. A meta-analytic review of measurement equivalence study findings of the SF-36® and SF-12® Health Surveys across electronic modes compared to paper administration. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1757-1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1851-2.
Prins-van Ginkel AC, de Hoog MLA, Uiterwaal C, Smit HA, Bruijning-Verhagen PC. Detecting acute otitis media symptom episodes using a mobile app: cohort study. JMIR mhealth uhealth. 2017;5:e181. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7505.
Ahmed R, Robinson R, Elsony A, et al. A comparison of smartphone and paper data-collection tools in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study in Gezira state, Sudan. PLoS One. 2018;13:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193917.
Kesse-guyot E, Assmann K, Andreeva V, et al. Lessons learned from methodological validation research in E-epidemiology. JMIR Public Heal Surveill. 2016;2:e160. https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.5880.
Caspi A, Gorsky P. Online deception: prevalence, motivation, and emotion. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006;9:54-59.
Yang CC, Yang H, Jiang L, Tang X. Detecting signals of adverse drug reactions from health consumer contributed content in social media. Paper presented at: HI-KDD Conference; 2012; Beijng, China.
Golder S, Norman G, Loke YK. Systematic review on the prevalence, frequency and comparative value of adverse events data in social media. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80:878-888. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12746.
Sloane R, Osanlou O, Lewis D, Bollegala D, Maskell S, Pirmohamed M. Social media and pharmacovigilance: a review of the opportunities and challenges. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80:910-920. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12717.
Kostkova P. A roadmap to integrated digital public health surveillance: the vision and the challenges. Paper presented at: World Wide Web Conference; May 13-17, 2013; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: 2013;687-693.
Chary M, Genes N, Giraud-carrier C, Hanson C, Nelson LS, Manini AF. Epidemiology from tweets: estimating misuse of prescription opioids in the USA from social media. J Med Toxicol. 2017;13:278-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-017-0625-5.
Segura-Bedman I, Martinez P. Detecting drugs and adverse events from Spanish health social media streams. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Health Text Mining and Information Analysis (Louhi); April 27, 2014; Gothenburg, Sweden: 2015; 106-115.
Caster O, Dietrich J, Kürzinger M-L, et al. Assessment of the utility of social media for broad - ranging statistical signal detection in pharmacovigilance: results from the WEB-RADR project. Drug Saf. 2018;41:1355-1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-018-0699-2.
Pierce CE, Bouri K, Pamer C, et al. Evaluation of Facebook and twitter monitoring to detect safety signals for medical products: an analysis of recent FDA safety alerts. Drug Saf. 2017;40:317-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-016-0491-0.
Yin Z, Sulieman LM, Malin BA. A systematic literature review of machine learning in online personal health data. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019;26:561-576. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz009.
Becker AS, Marcon M, Ghafoor S, Wurnig MC, Frauenfelder T, Boss A. Deep learning in mammography diagnostic accuracy of a multipurpose image analysis software in the detection of breast cancer. Invest Radiol. 2017;52:434-440. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000358.
Kooi T, Litjens G, van Ginneken B, et al. Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions. Med Image Anal. 2017;35:303-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2016.07.007.
Yu KH, Zhang C, Berry GJ, et al. Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features. Nat Commun. 2016;7:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12474.
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542:115-118. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21056.
Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA. 2016;316:2402-2410. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.17216.
Castro VM, Dligach D, Finan S, et al. Large-scale identification of patients with cerebral aneurysms using natural language processing. Neurology. 2017;88:164-168. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003490.
Zhou L, Baughman AW, Lei VJ, et al. Identifying patients with depression using free-text clinical documents. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:629-633. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-629.
Zhou L, Plasek JM, Mahoney LM, et al. Using Medical Text Extraction, Reasoning and Mapping System (MTERMS) to process medication information in outpatient clinical notes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;1639-1648.
Luo Y, Thompson WK, Herr TM, et al. Natural language processing for EHR-based pharmacovigilance: a structured review. Drug Saf. 2017;40:1075-1089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-017-0558-6.
Zhou L, Dhopeshwarkar N, Blumenthal KG, et al. Drug allergies documented in electronic health records of a large healthcare system. Allergy. 2016;71:1305-1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12881.
Navathe AS, Zhong F, Lei VJ, et al. Hospital readmission and social risk factors identified from physician notes. Health Serv Res. 2018;53:1110-1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12670.
Zhou L, Lu Y, Vitale CJ, et al. Representation of information about family relatives as structured data in electronic health records. Appl Clin Inform. 2014;5:349-367. https://doi.org/10.4338/aci-2013-10-ra-0080.
Xia Z, Secor E, Chibnik LB, et al. Modeling disease severity in multiple sclerosis using electronic health records. PLoS One. 2013;8:e78927. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078927.
Winnenburg R, Wächter T, Plake C, Doms A, Schroeder M. Facts from text: can text mining help to scale-up high-quality manual curation of gene products with ontologies? Brief Bioinform. 2008;9:466-478. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbn043.
Rosenberg D, Handler A, Furner S. A new method for classifying patterns of prenatal care utilization using cluster analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2004;8:19-30. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MACI.0000019845.04353.78.
Nelson DW, Bellander BM, MacCallum RM, et al. Cerebral microdialysis of patients with severe traumatic brain injury exhibits highly individualistic patterns as visualized by cluster analysis with self-organizing maps. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:2428-2436. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000147688.08813.9C.
Waniek S, Di Giuseppe R, Esatbeyoglu T, et al. Vitamin E (α-and γ-tocopherol) levels in the community: distribution, clinical and biochemical correlates, and association with dietary patterns. Nutrients. 2018;10:1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10010003.
Kemmler G, Holzner B, Kopp M, et al. Multidimensional scaling as a tool for analyzing multivariate medical data. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:223-233.
Maclure M. Case-crossover designs for more patient-centred epidemiology. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2014;28:77-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12107.
U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Information Technology Infrastructure for N-of-1 Trials. Effective Health Care Program [Internet].chap 5. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/topics/n-1-trials/research-2014. 2014. Cited May 17, 2019.
Hernan MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology. 2004;15:615-625. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000135174.63482.43.
Robins JM, Hernan MA, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2000;11:550-560.
Greenland S, Finkle WD. A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:1255-1264.
Wood WA, Bennett AV, Basch E. Emerging uses of patient generated health data in clinical research. Mol Oncol. 2015;9:1018-1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molonc.2014.08.006.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Examining Oversight of the Privacy & Security of Health Data Collected by Entities Not Regulated by HIPAA [Internet]. Washington, DC; 2016. https://www.healthit.gov/buzz-blog/privacy-and-security-of-ehrs/examining-oversight-privacy-security-health-data-collected-entities-not-regulated-hipaa/. Accessed November 10, 2020.
European Commission. 2018 reform of EU data protection rules [Internet]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en. Cited May 17, 2019 accesed date 10 November 2020.
Food and Drug Administration. Use of Electronic Informed Consent: Questions and Answers. Guidance for Institutional Review Boards, Investigators, and Sponsors [Internet]. Silver Spring, MD; 2016. https://www.fda.gov/media/116850/download. Accessed November 10, 2020.
Samuel G, Ahmed W, Kara H, Jessop C, Quinton S, Sanger S. Is it time to re-evaluate the ethics governance of social media research? J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018;13:452-454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618793773.
Ayers JW, Caputi TL, Nebeker C, Dredze M. Don't quote me: reverse identification of research participants in social media studies. npj Digit Med. 2018;1:29-30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0036-2.
Matsuda Y, Rosenstein P, Scovitch C, Takamura K. Data collection: defining the customer. Direct marketing on the internet [Internet]. Cited May 20, 2019. http://web.mit.edu/ecom/www/Project98/G2/data.htm. Accessed November 10, 2020.
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC). What are the differences between electronic medical records, electronic health records, and personal health records? [Internet]. Cited May 21, 2019. https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-are-differences-between-electronic-medical-records-electronic-health-records-and-personal. Accessed November 10, 2020.
Mantas J. Electronic health record. In: Mantas J, Hasman A, eds. Textbook in Health Informatics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press; 2002:250-257.
Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification”. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments; September 2011; Tampere, Finland.
Cugelman B. Gamification: what it is and why it matters to digital health behavior change developers. JMIR Serious Games. 2013;1:e3. https://doi.org/10.2196/games.3139.
Samuel AL. Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J Res Dev. 1959;44:206-226. https://doi.org/10.1109/76.257218.
Sidey-Gibbons JAM, Sidey-Gibbons CJ. Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0681-4.
European Medicines Agency and Heads of Medicines Agencies. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP) [Internet]. 2017. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-good-pharmacovigilance-practices-annex-i-definitions-rev-4_en.pdf. Accessed November 10, 2020.
(FDA) USF& DA. Is the product a medical device? [Internet]. Cited May 29, 2019. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/classify-your-medical-device/product-medical-device. 2018. Accessed November 10, 2020.
Cohen KB. Biomedical natural language processing and text mining. Methods in Biomedical Informatics. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Inc.; 2014:chap 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-401678-1.00006-3.
Howie L, Hirsch B, Locklear T, Abernethy AP. Assessing the value of patient-generated data to comparative effectiveness research. Health Aff. 2014;33:1220-1228. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0225.
Shapiro, M., Johnston, D., Wald, J., Mon D. Patient-generated health data. White paper. [Internet]. Office of Policy and Planning. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2012. http://www.rti.org/pubs/patientgeneratedhealthdata.pdf. Accessed November 10. 2020.
Lai AM, Hsueh P-YS, Choi YK, Austin RR. Present and future trends in consumer health informatics and patient-generated health data. Yearb Med Inform. 2017;26:152-159. https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2017-016.
HealthIT.gov National Learning Consortium. Patient-Generated Health Data Fact Sheet [Internet]. https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/patient_generated_data_factsheet.pdf. 2014. Cited May 20, 2019.
Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient- reported experience measures. BJA Educ. 2017;17(4):137-144. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaed/mkw060.
Makady A, de Boer A, Hillege H, Klungel O, Goettsch W. What is real-world data? A review of definitions based on literature and stakeholder interviews. Value Heal. 2017;20:858-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.03.008.
Miani C, Robin E, Horvath V, Manville C, Cave J, Chataway J. Health and Healthcare: Assessing the Real World Data Policy Landscape in Europe [Internet]. RAND Europe; 2014. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR544.html.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). Real-world evidence [Internet]. Cited May 30, 2019. https://www.fda.gov/science-research/science-and-research-special-topics/real-world-evidence. Accessed November 10, 2020.