Elevating the uses of storytelling approaches within Indigenous health research: a critical and participatory scoping review protocol involving Indigenous people and settlers.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
Aboriginal peoples
Alaska Native peoples
Aotearoa
Australia
Canada
Decolonizing research
First Nations
Health
Indigenous peoples
Inuit
Maori
Metis
Native Americans
New Zealand
Qualitative
Scoping review
Stories
Storytelling
Turtle Island
Two-eyed seeing
USA
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 11 2020
04 11 2020
Historique:
received:
28
05
2020
accepted:
12
10
2020
entrez:
5
11
2020
pubmed:
6
11
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a complicated and exploitative history of research with Indigenous peoples and accompanying calls to meaningfully and respectfully include Indigenous knowledge in healthcare. Storytelling approaches that privilege Indigenous voices can be a useful tool to break the hold that Western worldviews have within the research. Our collaborative team of Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers, and Indigenous patients, Elders, healthcare providers, and administrators, will conduct a critical participatory, scoping review to identify and examine how storytelling has been used as a method in Indigenous health research. Guided by two-eyed seeing, we will use Bassett and McGibbon's adaption of Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology. Relevant articles will be identified through a systematic search of the gray literature, core Indigenous health journals, and online databases including Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AgeLine, Academic Search Complete, Bibliography of Native North Americans, Canadian Reference Centre, and PsycINFO. Qualitative and mixed-methods research articles will be included if the researchers involved Indigenous participants or their healthcare professionals living in Turtle Island (i.e., Canada and the USA), Australia, or Aotearoa (New Zealand); use storytelling as a research method; focus on healthcare phenomena; and are written in English. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full-text articles. We will extract data, identify the array of storytelling approaches, and critically examine how storytelling was valued and used. An intensive collaboration will be woven throughout all review stages as academic researchers co-create this work with Indigenous patients, Elders, healthcare professionals, and administrators. Participatory strategies will include four relational gatherings throughout the project. Based on our findings, we will co-create a framework to guide the respectful use of storytelling as a method in Indigenous health research involving Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples. This work will enable us to elucidate the extent, range, and nature of storytelling within Indigenous health research, to critically reflect on how it has been and could be used, and to develop guidance for the respectful use of this method within research that involves Indigenous peoples and settlers. Our findings will enable the advancement of storytelling methods which meaningfully include Indigenous perspectives, practices, and priorities to benefit the health and wellbeing of Indigenous communities. Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/rvf7q ).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is a complicated and exploitative history of research with Indigenous peoples and accompanying calls to meaningfully and respectfully include Indigenous knowledge in healthcare. Storytelling approaches that privilege Indigenous voices can be a useful tool to break the hold that Western worldviews have within the research. Our collaborative team of Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers, and Indigenous patients, Elders, healthcare providers, and administrators, will conduct a critical participatory, scoping review to identify and examine how storytelling has been used as a method in Indigenous health research.
METHODS
Guided by two-eyed seeing, we will use Bassett and McGibbon's adaption of Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology. Relevant articles will be identified through a systematic search of the gray literature, core Indigenous health journals, and online databases including Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AgeLine, Academic Search Complete, Bibliography of Native North Americans, Canadian Reference Centre, and PsycINFO. Qualitative and mixed-methods research articles will be included if the researchers involved Indigenous participants or their healthcare professionals living in Turtle Island (i.e., Canada and the USA), Australia, or Aotearoa (New Zealand); use storytelling as a research method; focus on healthcare phenomena; and are written in English. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full-text articles. We will extract data, identify the array of storytelling approaches, and critically examine how storytelling was valued and used. An intensive collaboration will be woven throughout all review stages as academic researchers co-create this work with Indigenous patients, Elders, healthcare professionals, and administrators. Participatory strategies will include four relational gatherings throughout the project. Based on our findings, we will co-create a framework to guide the respectful use of storytelling as a method in Indigenous health research involving Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples.
DISCUSSION
This work will enable us to elucidate the extent, range, and nature of storytelling within Indigenous health research, to critically reflect on how it has been and could be used, and to develop guidance for the respectful use of this method within research that involves Indigenous peoples and settlers. Our findings will enable the advancement of storytelling methods which meaningfully include Indigenous perspectives, practices, and priorities to benefit the health and wellbeing of Indigenous communities.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION
Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/rvf7q ).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33148328
doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01503-6
pii: 10.1186/s13643-020-01503-6
pmc: PMC7640994
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
257Références
Nurs Inq. 2019 Jul;26(3):e12314
pubmed: 31297909
Can J Nurs Res. 2012 Jun;44(2):20-42
pubmed: 22894005
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2015 Apr 20;2:2333393615580764
pubmed: 28462305
CMAJ. 2018 May 22;190(20):E616-E621
pubmed: 29789286
Nurs Inq. 2007 Jun;14(2):162-8
pubmed: 17518828
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014 Apr;11(2):133-9
pubmed: 24597543
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2002 Sep;25(1):1-17
pubmed: 12889574
Health Place. 2018 Nov;54:191-199
pubmed: 30321859
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Qual Health Res. 2018 Jan;28(2):175-188
pubmed: 29182046
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;238:112495
pubmed: 31465937
Arts Health. 2019 Apr 26;:1-20
pubmed: 31038419
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):5052-5064
pubmed: 28793387
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2013 Apr 23;10:
pubmed: 23629466
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
Health Care Women Int. 2014;35(10):1216-26
pubmed: 23980668
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 23;18(1):1198
pubmed: 30352579
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2019 Dec;78(1):1630233
pubmed: 31199204
Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 5;7(1):41
pubmed: 29506568
Glob Health Promot. 2009 Dec;16(4):16-26
pubmed: 20028665