Assessment of Lingual Tactile Sensitivity in Children and Adults: Methodological Suitability and Challenges.

Von Frey filaments age-related differences child food neophobia food texture gratings orientation test tactile sensitivity texture preference

Journal

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 30 09 2020
revised: 28 10 2020
accepted: 31 10 2020
entrez: 6 11 2020
pubmed: 7 11 2020
medline: 7 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Few methodological approaches have been developed to measure lingual tactile sensitivity, and little information exists about the comparison between children and adults. The aims of the study were to: verify the cognitive and perceptive suitability of Von Frey filaments and a gratings orientation test in children of different ages; compare lingual tactile sensitivity between children and adults; investigate the relationships between lingual tactile sensitivity, preference and consumption of foods with different textures and level of food neophobia. One hundred and forty-seven children aged 6-13 years and their parents participated in the study, in addition to a separate sample of seventy adults. Participants filled in questionnaires, and lingual tactile sensitivity was evaluated through filaments and gratings. Results showed that gratings evaluation was more difficult than filaments assessment but enabled a better separation of participants according to their performance than filaments. R-indices from filaments were not correlated with those of gratings, suggesting that the tools measure different dimensions of lingual tactile sensitivity. No differences were found in lingual tactile sensitivity between children and adults, nor between children of different ages. Food neophobia was negatively associated with preferences of hard foods in children. Although a multifactor analysis concluded that neither texture preferences nor food consumption were strongly correlated with lingual tactile sensitivity, there was a weak but significant positive correlation between lingual tactile sensitivity to the finest Von Frey filament and food neophobia in the youngest age group, indicating that children with higher levels of food neophobia are more sensitive to oral tactile stimuli. Suitable child-friendly adaptations for the assessment of lingual sensitivity in children are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33153020
pii: foods9111594
doi: 10.3390/foods9111594
pmc: PMC7694000
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : University of Milan
ID : Piano di sostegno alla ricerca 2018

Références

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Nov;57(11):1324-30
pubmed: 10555797
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003 Feb;57(2):341-8
pubmed: 12571670
Sci Rep. 2019 May 15;9(1):7437
pubmed: 31092875
PM R. 2012 Feb;4(2):117-22
pubmed: 22373461
J Neurophysiol. 1981 Dec;46(6):1177-92
pubmed: 7320742
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Sep;235(9):2679-2688
pubmed: 28589232
Nutrition. 2005 Jan;21(1):14-9
pubmed: 15729777
Physiol Behav. 2003 Nov;80(2-3):289-302
pubmed: 14637228
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Jun;114(6):881-8
pubmed: 24091061
Muscle Nerve. 2010 Sep;42(3):328-38
pubmed: 20665509
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1994 May;72(5):484-7
pubmed: 7954077
Appetite. 2016 Jan 1;96:347-357
pubmed: 26391004
Food Funct. 2019 Sep 1;10(9):5386-5397
pubmed: 31397459
J Food Sci. 2009 Aug;74(6):R57-64
pubmed: 19723222
J Psychol. 2007 Mar;141(2):127-34
pubmed: 17479583
Appetite. 2009 Apr;52(2):410-5
pubmed: 19110019
Physiol Behav. 2018 Oct 1;194:515-521
pubmed: 29981764
J Neurophysiol. 1981 Dec;46(6):1192-203
pubmed: 6275041
Psychol Rev. 1954 Nov;61(6):401-9
pubmed: 13215690
Psychol Rev. 1961 Sep;68:301-40
pubmed: 13774292
Food Qual Prefer. 2012 Oct 1;26(1):58-66
pubmed: 22711981
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1988 Apr;66(4):430-8
pubmed: 3048612
Appetite. 2015 Jan;84:181-7
pubmed: 25312750
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Nov;17(6):539-58
pubmed: 11151974
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Feb;77(2):737-48
pubmed: 9065846
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr;103(4):1741-7
pubmed: 20130037
Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2013;4:237-66
pubmed: 23244397
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013 Oct;26(5):415-20
pubmed: 23252829
Appetite. 1992 Oct;19(2):105-20
pubmed: 1489209
Physiol Behav. 2001 Feb;72(3):427-37
pubmed: 11274688
Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2361-6
pubmed: 7991127
Neuron. 2013 Aug 21;79(4):618-39
pubmed: 23972592
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Jul;115(7):1134-40
pubmed: 25935569

Auteurs

Marta Appiani (M)

Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Noemi Sofia Rabitti (NS)

Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Lisa Methven (L)

Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AP, UK.

Camilla Cattaneo (C)

Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Monica Laureati (M)

Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH