Early Multinational Experience of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement for Treating Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this registry was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of transcatheter tricuspid valve implantation (TTVI) in patients with extreme surgical risk.

BACKGROUND

Isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) surgery is associated with high in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients (mean age 75 ± 10 years; 56% women) from 10 institutions, with symptomatic functional TR, had institutional and notified body approval for compassionate use of the GATE TTVI system. Baseline, discharge, and 30-day follow-up echocardiographic data and procedural, in-hospital, and follow-up clinical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

At baseline, all patients had multiple comorbidities, severe or greater TR, and reduced baseline right ventricular function. Technical success was achieved in 26 of 30 patients (87%). Device malpositioning occurred in 4 patients, with conversion to open heart surgery in 2 (5%). Of those who received the device, 100% had reductions in TR of ≥1, and 75% experienced reductions of ≥2 grades, resulting in 18 of 24 of patients (76%) with mild or less TR at discharge. All patients had mild or less central TR. There was continued improvement in TR grade between discharge and 30 days in 15 of 19 patients (79%). In-hospital mortality was 10%. At mean follow-up of 127 ± 82 days, 4 patients (13%) had died. Of patients alive at follow-up, 62% were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II, with no late device-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Compassionate treatment of severe, symptomatic functional TR using a first-generation TTVI device is associated with significant reduction in TR and improvement in functional status with acceptable in-hospital mortality. Further studies are needed to determine the appropriate patient population and long-term outcomes with TTVI therapy.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Author Relationship With Industry Drs. Bartus and Rodés-Cabau are consultants for NaviGate Cardiac Structures. Dr. Hahn has received speaking fees from Boston Scientific, Baylis Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; is an advisory board member for Abbott Structural, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, NaviGate Cardiac Structures, and Philips Healthcare; holds equity in NaviGate Cardiac Structures; has received nonfinancial support from 3mensio; and is the chief scientific officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation. Dr. Latib is a consultant for Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and NeoChord. Dr. Navia is a consultant for NaviGate Cardiac Structures, with equity and royalties for inventor patents of the device. Dr. Sievert is a consultant for 4tech Cardio, Abbott, Ablative Solutions, Ancora Heart, Append Medical, Bavaria Medizin Technologie, BioVentrix, Boston Scientific, Carag, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardimed, CeloNova Biosciences, Comed, Contego, CVRx, Dinova, Edwards Lifesciences, Endologix, Hemoteq, Hangzhou Nuomao Medtech, Holistick Medical, Lifetech Scientific, Maquet Getinge Group, Medtronic, Mokita, Occlutech, ReCor Medical, Renal Guard, Terumo, Vascular Dynamics, Vectorious Medtech, Venock, Venus, and Vivasure Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the content of this paper to disclose.