Important considerations for trials for peripheral arterial disease: Lessons learned from the paclitaxel mortality signal: A report on behalf of the registry assessment for peripheral interventional Devices (RAPID) Paclitaxel Pathways Program.
Advisory Committees
Angioplasty
Angioplasty, Balloon
Atherectomy
Common Data Elements
Data Accuracy
Data Collection
Drug-Eluting Stents
Femoral Artery
/ surgery
Humans
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Mortality
Paclitaxel
/ administration & dosage
Peripheral Arterial Disease
/ surgery
Popliteal Artery
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
Stents
Tubulin Modulators
/ administration & dosage
Journal
American heart journal
ISSN: 1097-6744
Titre abrégé: Am Heart J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370465
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
26
10
2020
accepted:
26
10
2020
pubmed:
7
11
2020
medline:
23
2
2021
entrez:
6
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Registry Assessment of Peripheral Devices (RAPID) convened a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders including clinicians, academicians, regulators and industry representatives to conduct an in-depth review of limitations associated with the data available to assess the paclitaxel mortality signal. Available studies were evaluated to identify strengths and limitations in the study design and data quality, which were translated to lessons learned to help guide the design, execution, and analyses of future studies. We suggest numerous actionable responses, such as the development and use of harmonized data points and outcomes in a consensus lean case report form. We advocate for reduction in missing data and efficient means for accrual of larger sample sizes in Peripheral arterial disease studies or use of supplemental datasets. Efforts to share lessons learned and working collaboratively to address such issues may improve future data in this device area and ultimately benefit patients. Condensed Abstract: Data sources evaluating paclitaxel-coated devices were evaluated to identify strengths and limitations in the study design and data quality, which were translated to lessons learned to help guide the design, execution, and analyses of future studies. We suggest numerous actionable responses, which we believe may improve future data in this device area and ultimately benefit patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33157067
pii: S0002-8703(20)30356-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.070
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Tubulin Modulators
0
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
71-83Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.