The impact of discernment counseling on individuals who decide to divorce: experiences of post-divorce communication and coparenting.


Journal

Journal of marital and family therapy
ISSN: 1752-0606
Titre abrégé: J Marital Fam Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7904614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 19 01 2020
revised: 28 08 2020
accepted: 10 10 2020
pubmed: 8 11 2020
medline: 14 10 2021
entrez: 7 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Discernment counseling is designed to help couples considering divorce arrive at a greater sense of clarity and confidence in their decision making about the future of their marriage. Possible outcomes include making no change to the marriage, divorcing, or attempting reconciliation through couples therapy. To date, no research has been done on whether or not discernment counseling helps couples who decide to divorce with their post-divorce family life (i.e., coparenting). We surveyed 11 people (from male-female couples) and conducted in-depth interviews with eight who had undergone discernment counseling and subsequently divorced to see what impact discernment counseling had on their post-divorce coparenting relationship. We analyzed the data from a phenomenological perspective. Respondents described their discernment counseling experience as helpful for achieving clarity and honesty in the divorce decision-making process, they shared their appreciation for the structure of the intervention, and indicated that it led to a greater coparental cooperation post-divorce.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33159369
doi: 10.1111/jmft.12463
pmc: PMC7894569
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

36-51

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.

Références

J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011 Jul;23(7):382-8
pubmed: 21696488
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr;69(2):323-32
pubmed: 11393609
J Marital Fam Ther. 2016 Apr;42(2):246-55
pubmed: 26189438
Nurse Res. 2004 Sep 1;12(1):82-83
pubmed: 28718745
Natl Health Stat Report. 2012 Mar 22;(49):1-21
pubmed: 22803221
Fam Process. 2017 Dec;56(4):852-868
pubmed: 28623842
Fam Court Rev. 2011 Jan;49(1):120-139
pubmed: 21552360
Fam Process. 2007 Mar;46(1):53-65
pubmed: 17375728
Future Child. 2005 Fall;15(2):75-96
pubmed: 16158731
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2002 Sep;5(3):173-95
pubmed: 12240706

Auteurs

Angela J Emerson (AJ)

Texas Wesleyan University, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

Steven M Harris (SM)

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Fathiya A Ahmed (FA)

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH