Simplified phenotyping of CYP2D6 for tamoxifen treatment using the N-desmethyl-tamoxifen/ endoxifen ratio.
Adult
Aged
Alleles
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
/ therapeutic use
Breast Neoplasms
/ blood
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6
/ classification
Drug Monitoring
/ methods
Female
Genotype
Humans
Middle Aged
Phenotype
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Tamoxifen
/ analogs & derivatives
CYP2D6
Endoxifen
Metabolism
Phenotype
Tamoxifen
Journal
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-3080
Titre abrégé: Breast
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9213011
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
07
04
2020
revised:
01
10
2020
accepted:
14
10
2020
pubmed:
9
11
2020
medline:
12
8
2021
entrez:
8
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
CYP2D6 protein activity can be inferred from the ratio of N-desmethyl-tamoxifen (NDMT) to endoxifen (E). CYP2D6 polymorphisms are common and can affect CYP2D6 protein activity and E level. Some retrospective studies indicate that E < 16 nM may relate to worse outcome. A target NDMT/E ratio was defined as associated with an E level of 15 nM in the 161 patient Test cohort of tamoxifen-treated patients, dichotomizing them into 'Normal' (NM) and 'Slow' (SM) CYP2D6 metabolizer groups. This ratio was then tested on a validation cohort of 52 patients. Patients were phenotyped based on the standard method (ultrarapid/extensive, intermediate or poor metabolizers; UM/EM, IM, PM) or a simplified system based on whether any variant allele (V) vs wildtype (wt) was present (wt/wt, wt/V, V/V). Comprehensive CYP2D6 genotyping was undertaken on germline DNA. A target NDMT/E ratio of 35 correlated with the 15 nM E level, dichotomizing patients into NM (<35; N = 117) and SM (>35; N = 44) groups. The ratio was independently validated by a validation cohort. The simplified system was better in predicting patients without slow metabolism, with specificity and sensitivity of 96% and 44% respectively, compared with the standard method - sensitivity 81% and specificity 83%. The simplified classification system based on whether any variant was present better identified patients who were truly not CYP2D6 slow metabolizers more accurately than the current system. However, as CYP2D6 genotype is not the only determinant of endoxifen level, we recommend that direct measurement of endoxifen should also be considered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33161337
pii: S0960-9776(20)30199-5
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.10.008
pmc: PMC7653100
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
0
Tamoxifen
094ZI81Y45
4-hydroxy-N-desmethyltamoxifen
46AF8680RC
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6
EC 1.14.14.1
N-desmethyltamoxifen
OOJ759O35C
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
229-234Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest Clara Inkyung Lee, Peter Fox, Bavanthi Balakrishnar, Bo Gao, Sally Coulter, Christopher Liddle, Mark Wong, and Nicholas Wilcken have no conflicts of interest to declare. Rina Hui has conflicts to declare including: Advisory board member for Merck Sharp and Dohme, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Roche and Bristol-Myers Squib, speaker honorarium for Merk Sharp and Dohme. Howard Gurney has conflicts to declare including: Advisory board/consulting role for Bristol-Myers Squib, Ipsen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Astra Zeneca, Janssen-Cilag. Honorarium for Pfizer. Ron H.J. Mathijssen has conflicts to declare including: Speakers’ Bureau: Novartis. Research Funding: Roche (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), Bayer Holding (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Cristal Therapeutics (Inst), Pamgene (Inst). Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Astellas Pharma. Stijn L.W. Koolen has conflicts to declare including: Speakers’ Bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Research Funding: Cristal Therapeutics (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Ipsen.
Références
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 May;89(5):718-25
pubmed: 21430657
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):436-46
pubmed: 25495490
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jul 1;22(13):3164-71
pubmed: 26847054
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1341-1352
pubmed: 26211827
Drugs. 1989 Apr;37(4):451-90
pubmed: 2661195
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 10;31(2):176-80
pubmed: 23091108
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 1998 Dec;1(2):173-185
pubmed: 11281961
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Apr;95(4):376-82
pubmed: 24458010
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1211-1220
pubmed: 28732650
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep;108(3):661-670
pubmed: 32578187
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 10;37(2):105-114
pubmed: 30475668
Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Aug;9(8):576-86
pubmed: 19629072
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1980-1981
pubmed: 31211599
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):122-137
pubmed: 29863451
Pharmacogenomics. 2002 Mar;3(2):229-43
pubmed: 11972444
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 20;25(21):3024-30
pubmed: 17536081
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 May;89(5):708-17
pubmed: 21451508
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011 Dec 15;56(5):1016-23
pubmed: 21872414
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar 10;37(8):636-646
pubmed: 30676859
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 28;19(1):125
pubmed: 29183390
Lancet. 2002 Jun 22;359(9324):2131-9
pubmed: 12090977
Lancet. 2005 May 14-20;365(9472):1687-717
pubmed: 15894097
Breast. 2018 Dec;42:38-40
pubmed: 30153552
Pharmacogenomics J. 2015 Feb;15(1):84-94
pubmed: 25091503
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):107-18
pubmed: 24881463
Cancer Treat Rev. 2015 Mar;41(3):289-99
pubmed: 25618289
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 16;9(4):e93392
pubmed: 24740141
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 May 15;24(10):2312-2318
pubmed: 29459457
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 22;11(3):
pubmed: 30909366
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 29;353(26):2747-57
pubmed: 16382061
Breast. 2019 Aug;46:52-57
pubmed: 31082762
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 Dec 19;20(Suppl 1):81
pubmed: 31852530
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Dec;11(12):1135-41
pubmed: 21087898
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 May;103(5):770-777
pubmed: 29385237