Impact of an e-learning module on personal protective equipment knowledge in student paramedics: a randomized controlled trial.


Journal

Antimicrobial resistance and infection control
ISSN: 2047-2994
Titre abrégé: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585411

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 11 2020
Historique:
received: 10 09 2020
accepted: 29 10 2020
entrez: 10 11 2020
pubmed: 11 11 2020
medline: 20 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Prehospital professionals such as emergency physicians or paramedics must be able to choose and adequately don and doff personal protective equipment (PPE) in order to avoid COVID-19 infection. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a gamified e-learning module on adequacy of PPE in student paramedics. This was a web-based, randomized 1:1, parallel-group, triple-blind controlled trial. Student paramedics from three Swiss schools were invited to participate. They were informed they would be presented with both an e-learning module and an abridged version of the current regional prehospital COVID-19 guidelines, albeit not in which order. After a set of 22 questions designed to assess baseline knowledge, the control group was shown the guidelines before answering a set of 14 post-intervention questions. The e-learning group was shown the gamified e-learning module right after the guidelines, and before answering post-intervention questions. The primary outcome was the difference in the percentage of adequate choices of PPE before and after the intervention. The participation rate was of 71% (98/138). A total of 90 answer sets was analyzed. Adequate choice of PPE increased significantly both in the control (50% [33;83] vs 25% [25;50], P = .013) and in the e-learning group (67% [50;83] vs 25% [25;50], P = .001) following the intervention. Though the median of the difference was higher in the e-learning group, there was no statistically significant superiority over the control (33% [0;58] vs 17% [- 17;42], P = .087). The e-learning module was of greatest benefit in the subgroup of student paramedics who were actively working in an ambulance company (42% [8;58] vs 25% [- 17;42], P = 0.021). There was no significant effect in student paramedics who were not actively working in an ambulance service (0% [- 25;33] vs 17% [- 8;50], P = .584). The use of a gamified e-learning module increases the rate of adequate choice of PPE only among student paramedics actively working in an ambulance service. In this subgroup, combining this teaching modality with other interventions might help spare PPE and efficiently protect against COVID-19 infection.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Prehospital professionals such as emergency physicians or paramedics must be able to choose and adequately don and doff personal protective equipment (PPE) in order to avoid COVID-19 infection. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a gamified e-learning module on adequacy of PPE in student paramedics.
METHODS
This was a web-based, randomized 1:1, parallel-group, triple-blind controlled trial. Student paramedics from three Swiss schools were invited to participate. They were informed they would be presented with both an e-learning module and an abridged version of the current regional prehospital COVID-19 guidelines, albeit not in which order. After a set of 22 questions designed to assess baseline knowledge, the control group was shown the guidelines before answering a set of 14 post-intervention questions. The e-learning group was shown the gamified e-learning module right after the guidelines, and before answering post-intervention questions. The primary outcome was the difference in the percentage of adequate choices of PPE before and after the intervention.
RESULTS
The participation rate was of 71% (98/138). A total of 90 answer sets was analyzed. Adequate choice of PPE increased significantly both in the control (50% [33;83] vs 25% [25;50], P = .013) and in the e-learning group (67% [50;83] vs 25% [25;50], P = .001) following the intervention. Though the median of the difference was higher in the e-learning group, there was no statistically significant superiority over the control (33% [0;58] vs 17% [- 17;42], P = .087). The e-learning module was of greatest benefit in the subgroup of student paramedics who were actively working in an ambulance company (42% [8;58] vs 25% [- 17;42], P = 0.021). There was no significant effect in student paramedics who were not actively working in an ambulance service (0% [- 25;33] vs 17% [- 8;50], P = .584).
CONCLUSIONS
The use of a gamified e-learning module increases the rate of adequate choice of PPE only among student paramedics actively working in an ambulance service. In this subgroup, combining this teaching modality with other interventions might help spare PPE and efficiently protect against COVID-19 infection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33168097
doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00849-9
pii: 10.1186/s13756-020-00849-9
pmc: PMC7652675
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

185

Références

NPJ Sci Learn. 2019 Sep 24;4:15
pubmed: 31583117
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 23;22(3):e16233
pubmed: 32202507
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 27;:
pubmed: 32716496
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):459-461
pubmed: 32284618
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 9;22(6):e18358
pubmed: 32299792
JMIR Serious Games. 2020 Jun 12;8(2):e20173
pubmed: 32516115
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1102-1109
pubmed: 32495830
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020 Aug;35(4):451-453
pubmed: 32507122
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 31;13(4):e126
pubmed: 22209829
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Jul 6;9(1):100
pubmed: 32631450
Med Educ. 2020 Sep;54(9):860
pubmed: 32403176
Lancet. 2020 May 23;395(10237):e93-e94
pubmed: 32416787
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(10):846-9
pubmed: 17898247
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 4;6(2):e19106
pubmed: 32339998
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 21;22(8):e21265
pubmed: 32747329
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34
pubmed: 15471760
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1132-1135
pubmed: 32324855
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 28;21(3):e12994
pubmed: 30920375
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jun 19;6(2):e19847
pubmed: 32530815
Med Educ. 2008 Aug;42(8):823-9
pubmed: 18564096

Auteurs

Laurent Suppan (L)

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland. laurent.suppan@hcuge.ch.

Loric Stuby (L)

Genève TEAM Ambulances, Geneva, Switzerland.

Birgit Gartner (B)

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.

Robert Larribau (R)

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.

Anne Iten (A)

Infection Control Program and WHO Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Mohamed Abbas (M)

Infection Control Program and WHO Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Stephan Harbarth (S)

Infection Control Program and WHO Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Mélanie Suppan (M)

Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH