Genetic and epigenetic landscape of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas with FGFR3-TACC3 fusions.
Aged
Brain Neoplasms
/ genetics
Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
Cohort Studies
DNA Copy Number Variations
/ genetics
DNA Methylation
/ genetics
DNA Modification Methylases
/ genetics
DNA Repair Enzymes
/ genetics
Female
Glioblastoma
/ genetics
Humans
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
/ genetics
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Microtubule-Associated Proteins
/ genetics
Middle Aged
Neurosurgical Procedures
Oncogene Fusion
Promoter Regions, Genetic
/ genetics
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3
/ genetics
Retrospective Studies
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
/ genetics
F3T3
FGFR3-TACC3 fusion
IDH-wildtype glioblastoma
Journal
Acta neuropathologica communications
ISSN: 2051-5960
Titre abrégé: Acta Neuropathol Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101610673
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 11 2020
09 11 2020
Historique:
received:
06
08
2020
accepted:
13
10
2020
entrez:
10
11
2020
pubmed:
11
11
2020
medline:
10
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A subset of glioblastomas (GBMs) harbors potentially druggable oncogenic FGFR3-TACC3 (F3T3) fusions. However, their associated molecular and clinical features are poorly understood. Here we analyze the frequency of F3T3-fusion positivity, its associated genetic and methylation profiles, and its impact on survival in 906 IDH-wildtype GBM patients. We establish an F3T3 prevalence of 4.1% and delineate its associations with cancer signaling pathway alterations. F3T3-positive GBMs had lower tumor mutational and copy-number alteration burdens than F3T3-wildtype GBMs. Although F3T3 fusions were predominantly mutually exclusive with other oncogenic RTK pathway alterations, they did rarely co-occur with EGFR amplification. They were less likely to harbor TP53 alterations. By methylation profiling, they were more likely to be assigned the mesenchymal or RTK II subclass. Despite being older at diagnosis and having similar frequencies of MGMT promoter hypermethylation, patients with F3T3-positive GBMs lived about 8 months longer than those with F3T3-wildtype tumors. While consistent with IDH-wildtype GBM, F3T3-positive GBMs exhibit distinct biological features, underscoring the importance of pursuing molecular studies prior to clinical trial enrollment and targeted treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33168106
doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-01058-6
pii: 10.1186/s40478-020-01058-6
pmc: PMC7653727
doi:
Substances chimiques
Microtubule-Associated Proteins
0
TACC3 protein, human
0
Tumor Suppressor Proteins
0
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase
EC 1.1.1.41
DNA Modification Methylases
EC 2.1.1.-
MGMT protein, human
EC 2.1.1.63
FGFR3 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3
EC 2.7.10.1
DNA Repair Enzymes
EC 6.5.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
186Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R35 NS105109
Pays : United States
Références
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Aug;136(2):181-210
pubmed: 29967940
Acta Neuropathol. 2012 Oct;124(4):547-60
pubmed: 22810491
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Feb;34(2):155-63
pubmed: 26619011
Nat Genet. 2013 Oct;45(10):1141-9
pubmed: 23917401
Nat Med. 2017 Jun;23(6):703-713
pubmed: 28481359
JAMA. 2016 Dec 6;316(21):2214-2236
pubmed: 27923088
Oncologist. 2017 Dec;22(12):1478-1490
pubmed: 28912153
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474
pubmed: 29539639
J Neurooncol. 2019 May;142(3):445-454
pubmed: 30710203
J Clin Invest. 2013 Feb;123(2):855-65
pubmed: 23298836
Acta Neuropathol. 2017 Mar;133(3):417-429
pubmed: 27812792
Mol Cancer Ther. 2020 Jun;19(6):1243-1254
pubmed: 32217742
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;19(9):1206-1216
pubmed: 28379477
J Mol Diagn. 2015 May;17(3):251-64
pubmed: 25801821
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Sep 19;44(16):e131
pubmed: 27270079
Science. 2012 Sep 7;337(6099):1231-5
pubmed: 22837387
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 Nov 25;11:1758835919890285
pubmed: 31803255
Nature. 2014 Jun 26;510(7506):537-41
pubmed: 24847876
Cancer Cell. 2011 Dec 13;20(6):810-7
pubmed: 22137795
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jul 15;21(14):3307-17
pubmed: 25609060
Nat Genet. 2013 Jun;45(6):602-12
pubmed: 23583981
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):110-119
pubmed: 30522967
JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017:
pubmed: 28890946
Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7
pubmed: 18064739
Bioinformatics. 2017 Jul 15;33(14):2238-2240
pubmed: 28334343
Genome Res. 2014 Nov;24(11):1765-73
pubmed: 25135958
Brain Pathol. 2018 Sep;28(5):674-683
pubmed: 28976058
JAMA. 2015 Dec 8;314(22):2373-83
pubmed: 26647259
J Mol Diagn. 2007 Jul;9(3):368-81
pubmed: 17591937
Open Biol. 2017 Aug;7(8):
pubmed: 28855393
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 21;109(8):3041-6
pubmed: 22323597
Cancer Discov. 2012 May;2(5):401-4
pubmed: 22588877
Cell. 2013 Oct 10;155(2):462-77
pubmed: 24120142
Nat Genet. 2016 Jan;48(1):4-6
pubmed: 26711108
J Mol Diagn. 2020 Mar;22(3):368-375
pubmed: 31881335
Nature. 2008 Oct 23;455(7216):1061-8
pubmed: 18772890
CNS Oncol. 2019 Jun;8(2):CNS37
pubmed: 31290679
Cancer Lett. 2013 May 10;332(1):63-73
pubmed: 23348690
Nature. 2018 Jan 11;553(7687):222-227
pubmed: 29323298
Sci Signal. 2013 Apr 02;6(269):pl1
pubmed: 23550210
Genome Res. 2012 Feb;22(2):407-19
pubmed: 21613409