Contemporary outcomes of aortic and mitral valve surgery for rheumatic heart disease in sub-Saharan Africa.
aortic valve
mitral valve
rheumatic heart disease
surgery
valve repair
valve replacement
Journal
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-685X
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
12
07
2019
revised:
19
02
2020
accepted:
20
02
2020
pubmed:
11
11
2020
medline:
30
12
2021
entrez:
10
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rheumatic heart disease is endemic in sub-Saharan Africa. There is a paucity of data on the outcomes of valvular surgery for rheumatic heart disease in the developing world. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of aortic and mitral valve surgery for rheumatic heart disease in Ethiopia. Between 2009 and 2017, 240 consecutive patients with rheumatic heart disease underwent aortic and/or mitral surgery at the Cardiac Center of Ethiopia in Addis Ababa. These surgeries were performed in the context of 22 international humanitarian missions. Median follow-up was 2.3 (interquartile range, 0.5-4.0) years and 96% complete. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent mechanical valve implantation (n = 90, 38%), bioprosthetic valve implantation (n = 58, 24%), and valve repair (n = 92, 38%). Mean age of patients was 19 ± 8 years, and 136 patients (57%) were female. Operative mortality occurred in 5 patients (2.1%) and was not significantly different between the groups. Eleven additional patients (5%) died at follow-up, and 55 patients (23%) had at least 1 major adverse valve-related event. Propensity score-adjusted Cox regression analysis demonstrated higher rates of death in the bioprosthetic group compared with the mechanical group (hazard ratio, 8.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-47.39; P = .011). Survival was not significantly different between the repair and mechanical groups (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-7.16; P = .93). Likewise, rates of major adverse valve-related event were higher in the bioprosthetic group compared with the mechanical group (hazard ratio, 2.71; 995% confidence interval, 1.13-6.49; P = .025), but not significantly different between the repair and mechanical groups (hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-4.39; P = .092). Left-sided valve surgery for rheumatic heart disease in sub-Saharan Africa is associated with acceptable perioperative outcomes, but a high incidence of major adverse valve-related event at follow-up. The use of bioprosthetic valves is associated with poor outcomes in this patient population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33168165
pii: S0022-5223(20)30996-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.02.139
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1714-1725.e2Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.