The Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group (PCCG) Consensus Conference Methodology.
anesthesia
craniofacial surgery
craniosynostosis
open cranial vault surgery
pediatric anesthesia
Journal
Paediatric anaesthesia
ISSN: 1460-9592
Titre abrégé: Paediatr Anaesth
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9206575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
received:
16
09
2020
accepted:
23
10
2020
pubmed:
12
11
2020
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
11
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This article describes the methodology used for the Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group (PCCG) Consensus Conference. This is a novel Consensus Conference of national experts in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery and Anesthesia, who will follow standards set by the Institute of Medicine and using the Research and Development/University of California, Los Angeles appropriateness method, modeled after the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative. Topics related to pediatric craniofacial anesthesia for open cranial vault surgery were divided into twelve subgroups with a systematic review of the literature. A group of 20 content experts met virtually between 2019 and 2020 and will collaborate in their selected topics related to perioperative management for pediatric open cranial vault surgery for craniosynostosis. These groups will also identify where future research is needed. Experts in pediatric craniofacial surgery and anesthesiology are developing recommendations on behalf of the Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group for perioperative management of patients undergoing open cranial vault surgery for craniosynostosis and identifying future research priorities.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
145-149Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Stricker PA , Goobie SM , Cladis FP , et al. Perioperative outcomes and management in pediatric complex cranial vault reconstruction: a multicenter study from the pediatric craniofacial collaborative group. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(2):276-287.
Valentine SL , Bateman ST , Bembea MM , et al. Consensus recommendations for red blood cell transfusion practice in critically ill children from the pediatric critical care transfusion and anemia expertise initiative (TAXI). Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19 :884-898.
Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference Group. Pediaric acute respiratory distress syndrome: consensus recommendations from the pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16:428-439.
Eriksen MG , Frandsen TF .The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on Literature search quality: a systematic re.
Covidence. https://www.covidence.org/. Accessed July 7, 2020.
Systematic review data repository. https://srdr.ahrq.gov/Edition. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2017. Accessed June 28, 2020.
Higgins JP , Altman DG , Gotzsche PC , et al. The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
Stang A . Critical evaluation of the newcastle-ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:603-605.
Schunemann H , Brozek J , Guyatt G , et al. (Eds): Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. https://Gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html. 2013. Accessed August 1, 2020.
GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro guideline development tool [software]. https://gradepro.org/Edition. McMaster University, 2015 (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc.), 2015. Accessed July 8, 2020.
Grading recommendations. https://www.uptodate.com/home/grading-guide#GradingRecommendationsEdition. UpToDate Inc, 2017. Accessed August 3, 2020.
Shiffman RN , Dixon J , Brandt C , et al. The GuideLine implementability appraisal (GLIA): Development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:23.
Fitch K , Bernstein S , Aguilar M , et al.The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1269.html. also available in print form. Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, 2001. Accessed July 29, 2020.