Assessment of ED triage of anaphylaxis patients based on the Emergency Severity Index.
Academic Medical Centers
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Anaphylaxis
/ diagnosis
Angioedema
/ physiopathology
Child
Child, Preschool
Cohort Studies
Emergency Medical Services
Emergency Service, Hospital
Epinephrine
/ therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Hypoxia
/ physiopathology
Infant
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Patient Acuity
Pharynx
Pruritus
/ physiopathology
Severity of Illness Index
Sympathomimetics
/ therapeutic use
Tachycardia
/ physiopathology
Tachypnea
/ physiopathology
Time-to-Treatment
/ statistics & numerical data
Triage
Urticaria
/ physiopathology
Uvula
Young Adult
Anaphylaxis
Emergency department
Epinephrine
Triage
Journal
The American journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1532-8171
Titre abrégé: Am J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
received:
20
07
2020
revised:
07
10
2020
accepted:
25
10
2020
pubmed:
13
11
2020
medline:
31
8
2021
entrez:
12
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To describe the emergency department (ED) triage of anaphylaxis patients based on the Emergency Severity Index (ESI), assess the association between ESI triage level and ED epinephrine administration, and determine characteristics associated with lower acuity triage ESI assignment (levels 3 and 4). We conducted a cohort study of adult and pediatric anaphylaxis patients between September 2010 and September 2018 at an academic ED. Patient characteristics and management were compared between Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage level 1 or 2 versus levels 3 or 4 using logistic regression analysis. We adhered to STROBE reporting guidelines. A total of 1090 patient visits were included. There were 26 (2%), 515 (47%), 489 (45%), and 60 (6%) visits that were assigned an ESI triage level of 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Epinephrine was administered in the ED to 53% of patients triaged ESI level 1 or 2 and to 40% of patients triaged ESI level 3 or 4. Patients who were assigned a lower acuity ESI level of 3 or 4 had a longer median time from ED arrival to epinephrine administration compared to those with a higher acuity ESI level of 1 or 2 (28 min compared to 13 min, p < .001). A lower acuity ESI level was more likely to be assigned to visits with a chief concern of hives, rash, or pruritus (OR 2.33 [95% CI, 1.20-4.53]) and less likely to be assigned to visits among adults (OR, 0.43 [0.31-0.60]), patients who received epinephrine from emergency medical services (OR 0.56 [0.38-0.82]), presented with posterior pharyngeal or uvular angioedema (OR, 0.56 [0.38-0.82]), hypoxemia (OR, 0.34 [0.18-0.64]), or increased heart (OR 0.83 [0.73-0.95]) or respiratory (OR 0.70 [0.60-0.82]) rates. Patients triaged to lower acuity ESI levels experienced delays in ED epinephrine administration. Adult and pediatric patients with skin-related chief concerns were more likely to be to be assigned lower acuity ESI levels. Further studies are needed to identify interventions that will improve ED anaphylaxis triage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33176953
pii: S0735-6757(20)30952-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.057
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Sympathomimetics
0
Epinephrine
YKH834O4BH
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
449-455Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest R.L. Campbell has been a consultant for Bryn Pharma. The rest of the authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.