Economic and Clinical Impact of Digitally Produced Dentures.
CAD/CAM
Digital dentures
chair time
complete dentures
cost savings
postinsertion visits
Journal
Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
ISSN: 1532-849X
Titre abrégé: J Prosthodont
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
accepted:
11
11
2020
pubmed:
17
11
2020
medline:
18
5
2021
entrez:
16
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Digital denture technology has been gradually moving to the mainstream of dentistry over the last 25 years. Implementation of a four-step system utilizing in-house CAD/CAM milling technology may create cost savings for the clinical program in a dental university setting. An analysis was completed to evaluate the cost savings, if any, of fabricating complete dentures digitally versus traditionally through an outside lab. A large clinic at a North American dental school began fabricating digital dentures in 2019 utilizing the four-step Ivoclar system. A combination of 3D printing and CAD/CAM milling produced multiple denture products used in the steps of the digital process, including the final milled complete denture. A significant cost savings was achieved, both in terms of material cost and in chair time cost when compared to traditional laboratory fabricated complete dentures. A large clinic at a North American dental school introduced digital denture technology into the student clinical experience. This digital technology has created a cost-saving benefit when fabricating digital dentures. Using 3D printing for the preliminary steps resulted in substantial cost savings. Fewer visits to complete the denture fabrication steps, along with fewer postinsertion visits, added further savings. Patient satisfaction with the digital denture process has been consistently high, as has student and faculty satisfaction with the final product.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
108-112Informations de copyright
© 2020 by the American College of Prosthodontists.
Références
Petropoulos VC, Rashedi B: Complete denture education in U.S. dental schools. J Prosthodont 2005;14:191-197
Maeda Y, Minoura M, Tsutsumi S, et al: A CAD/CAM system for removable denture. Part I: fabrication of complete dentures.Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:17-21
O G. Digital Dentures: Latest and Greatest? Inside Dental Technology: aegisdentalnetwork.com; 2017. https://www.aegisdentalnetwork.com/idt/2017/10/digital-dentures-latest-and-greatest. Accessed 6/5/2020
Fernandez MA, Nimmo A, Behar-Horenstein LS. Digital denture fabrication in pre- and postdoctoral education: a survey of U.S. dental schools. J Prosthodont 2016;25:83-90
Janeva NM, Kovacevska G, Elencevski S, et al. Advantages of CAD/CAM versus conventional complete dentures-a review. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018;6:1498-1502
Krzyzostaniak L: Is the future of dentures digital? Dental Products Report; 2017 https://www.dentalproductsreport.com/view/future-dentures-digital. Accessed 6/5/2020
Bidra AS, Farrell K, Burnham D, et al: Prospective cohort pilot study of 2-visit CAD/CAM monolithic complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures: clinical and patient-centered outcomes. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:578-86 e1
Drago C, Borgert AJ. Comparison of nonscheduled, postinsertion adjustment visits for complete dentures fabricated with conventional and CAD-CAM protocols: a clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2019;122:459-466
Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, et al: Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:249-256
Bilgin MS, Erdem A, Aglarci OS, et al: Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM and RP technologies. J Prosthodont 2015;24:576-579
Steinmassl O, Dumfahrt H, Grunert I, et al: CAD/CAM produces dentures with improved fit. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:2829-2835
Saponaro PC, Yilmaz B, Johnston W, et al: Evaluation of patient experience and satisfaction with CAD-CAM-fabricated complete dentures: a retrospective survey study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:524-528