Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): a phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Adult
Advanced Cardiac Life Support
/ methods
Aged
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
/ methods
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
/ methods
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
/ epidemiology
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Patient Discharge
/ trends
Reperfusion
/ methods
Safety
Survival
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Fibrillation
/ complications
Young Adult
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 12 2020
05 12 2020
Historique:
received:
12
10
2020
revised:
23
10
2020
accepted:
28
10
2020
pubmed:
17
11
2020
medline:
27
3
2021
entrez:
16
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and ventricular fibrillation, more than half present with refractory ventricular fibrillation unresponsive to initial standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) treatment. We did the first randomised clinical trial in the USA of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-facilitated resuscitation versus standard ACLS treatment in patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation. For this phase 2, single centre, open-label, adaptive, safety and efficacy randomised clinical trial, we included adults aged 18-75 years presenting to the University of Minnesota Medical Center (MN, USA) with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation, no return of spontaneous circulation after three shocks, automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a Lund University Cardiac Arrest System, and estimated transfer time shorter than 30 min. Patients were randomly assigned to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation or standard ACLS treatment on hospital arrival by use of a secure schedule generated with permuted blocks of randomly varying block sizes. Allocation concealment was achieved by use of a randomisation schedule that required scratching off an opaque layer to reveal assignment. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were safety, survival, and functional assessment at hospital discharge and at 3 months and 6 months after discharge. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. The study qualified for exception from informed consent (21 Code of Federal Regulations 50.24). The ARREST trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03880565. Between Aug 8, 2019, and June 14, 2020, 36 patients were assessed for inclusion. After exclusion of six patients, 30 were randomly assigned to standard ACLS treatment (n=15) or to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation (n=15). One patient in the ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group withdrew from the study before discharge. The mean age was 59 years (range 36-73), and 25 (83%) of 30 patients were men. Survival to hospital discharge was observed in one (7%) of 15 patients (95% credible interval 1·6-30·2) in the standard ACLS treatment group versus six (43%) of 14 patients (21·3-67·7) in the early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group (risk difference 36·2%, 3·7-59·2; posterior probability of ECMO superiority 0·9861). The study was terminated at the first preplanned interim analysis by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute after unanimous recommendation from the Data Safety Monitoring Board after enrolling 30 patients because the posterior probability of ECMO superiority exceeded the prespecified monitoring boundary. Cumulative 6-month survival was significantly better in the early ECMO group than in the standard ACLS group. No unanticipated serious adverse events were observed. Early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation for patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation significantly improved survival to hospital discharge compared with standard ACLS treatment. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and ventricular fibrillation, more than half present with refractory ventricular fibrillation unresponsive to initial standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) treatment. We did the first randomised clinical trial in the USA of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-facilitated resuscitation versus standard ACLS treatment in patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation.
METHODS
For this phase 2, single centre, open-label, adaptive, safety and efficacy randomised clinical trial, we included adults aged 18-75 years presenting to the University of Minnesota Medical Center (MN, USA) with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation, no return of spontaneous circulation after three shocks, automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a Lund University Cardiac Arrest System, and estimated transfer time shorter than 30 min. Patients were randomly assigned to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation or standard ACLS treatment on hospital arrival by use of a secure schedule generated with permuted blocks of randomly varying block sizes. Allocation concealment was achieved by use of a randomisation schedule that required scratching off an opaque layer to reveal assignment. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were safety, survival, and functional assessment at hospital discharge and at 3 months and 6 months after discharge. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. The study qualified for exception from informed consent (21 Code of Federal Regulations 50.24). The ARREST trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03880565.
FINDINGS
Between Aug 8, 2019, and June 14, 2020, 36 patients were assessed for inclusion. After exclusion of six patients, 30 were randomly assigned to standard ACLS treatment (n=15) or to early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation (n=15). One patient in the ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group withdrew from the study before discharge. The mean age was 59 years (range 36-73), and 25 (83%) of 30 patients were men. Survival to hospital discharge was observed in one (7%) of 15 patients (95% credible interval 1·6-30·2) in the standard ACLS treatment group versus six (43%) of 14 patients (21·3-67·7) in the early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation group (risk difference 36·2%, 3·7-59·2; posterior probability of ECMO superiority 0·9861). The study was terminated at the first preplanned interim analysis by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute after unanimous recommendation from the Data Safety Monitoring Board after enrolling 30 patients because the posterior probability of ECMO superiority exceeded the prespecified monitoring boundary. Cumulative 6-month survival was significantly better in the early ECMO group than in the standard ACLS group. No unanticipated serious adverse events were observed.
INTERPRETATION
Early ECMO-facilitated resuscitation for patients with OHCA and refractory ventricular fibrillation significantly improved survival to hospital discharge compared with standard ACLS treatment.
FUNDING
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33197396
pii: S0140-6736(20)32338-2
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32338-2
pmc: PMC7856571
mid: NIHMS1648530
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03880565']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1807-1816Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R33 HL142696
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R61 HL142696
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
Circulation. 2016 Apr 5;133(14):1386-96
pubmed: 26920493
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Jun;3(2):183-91
pubmed: 24569450
Circulation. 2019 Mar 19;139(12):e530-e552
pubmed: 30760026
Am Heart J. 2020 Nov;229:29-39
pubmed: 32911433
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 13;29-30:100632
pubmed: 33437949
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jun 1;41(21):1961-1971
pubmed: 31670793
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):
pubmed: 27412906
Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:154-159
pubmed: 29253646
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 29;70(9):1109-1117
pubmed: 28838358
Resuscitation. 2018 Nov;132:47-55
pubmed: 30171974
Circulation. 2020 Mar 17;141(11):877-886
pubmed: 31896278
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S444-64
pubmed: 26472995
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 Sep-Oct;20(5):615-22
pubmed: 27018764
Circulation. 2019 Dec 10;140(24):e881-e894
pubmed: 31722552
Circulation. 2019 Aug 27;140(9):e517-e542
pubmed: 31291775
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Dec;44(12):2153-2161
pubmed: 30430207
Resuscitation. 2016 Apr;101:50-6
pubmed: 26851705
Circulation. 2019 Dec 10;140(24):e895-e903
pubmed: 31722563