iCLIP analysis of RNA substrates of the archaeal exosome.
Archaea
Exoribonuclease
Exosome
Poly(A)
RNA binding
Sulfolobus solfataricus
circRNA
iCLIP
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Nov 2020
16 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
07
05
2020
accepted:
27
10
2020
entrez:
17
11
2020
pubmed:
18
11
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The archaeal exosome is an exoribonucleolytic multiprotein complex, which degrades single-stranded RNA in 3' to 5' direction phosphorolytically. In a reverse reaction, it can add A-rich tails to the 3'-end of RNA. The catalytic center of the exosome is in the aRrp41 subunit of its hexameric core. Its RNA-binding subunits aRrp4 and aDnaG confer poly(A) preference to the complex. The archaeal exosome was intensely characterized in vitro, but still little is known about its interaction with natural substrates in the cell, particularly because analysis of the transcriptome-wide interaction of an exoribonuclease with RNA is challenging. To determine binding sites of the exosome to RNA on a global scale, we performed individual-nucleotide resolution UV crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (iCLIP) analysis with antibodies directed against aRrp4 and aRrp41 of the chrenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. A relatively high proportion (17-19%) of the obtained cDNA reads could not be mapped to the genome. Instead, they corresponded to adenine-rich RNA tails, which are post-transcriptionally synthesized by the exosome, and to circular RNAs (circRNAs). We identified novel circRNAs corresponding to 5' parts of two homologous, transposase-related mRNAs. To detect preferred substrates of the exosome, the iCLIP reads were compared to the transcript abundance using RNA-Seq data. Among the strongly enriched exosome substrates were RNAs antisense to tRNAs, overlapping 3'-UTRs and RNAs containing poly(A) stretches. The majority of the read counts and crosslink sites mapped in mRNAs. Furthermore, unexpected crosslink sites clustering at 5'-ends of RNAs was detected. In this study, RNA targets of an exoribonuclease were analyzed by iCLIP. The data documents the role of the archaeal exosome as an exoribonuclease and RNA-tailing enzyme interacting with all RNA classes, and underlines its role in mRNA turnover, which is important for adaptation of prokaryotic cells to changing environmental conditions. The clustering of crosslink sites near 5'-ends of genes suggests simultaneous binding of both RNA ends by the S. solfataricus exosome. This may serve to prevent translation of mRNAs dedicated to degradation in 3'-5' direction.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The archaeal exosome is an exoribonucleolytic multiprotein complex, which degrades single-stranded RNA in 3' to 5' direction phosphorolytically. In a reverse reaction, it can add A-rich tails to the 3'-end of RNA. The catalytic center of the exosome is in the aRrp41 subunit of its hexameric core. Its RNA-binding subunits aRrp4 and aDnaG confer poly(A) preference to the complex. The archaeal exosome was intensely characterized in vitro, but still little is known about its interaction with natural substrates in the cell, particularly because analysis of the transcriptome-wide interaction of an exoribonuclease with RNA is challenging.
RESULTS
RESULTS
To determine binding sites of the exosome to RNA on a global scale, we performed individual-nucleotide resolution UV crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (iCLIP) analysis with antibodies directed against aRrp4 and aRrp41 of the chrenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. A relatively high proportion (17-19%) of the obtained cDNA reads could not be mapped to the genome. Instead, they corresponded to adenine-rich RNA tails, which are post-transcriptionally synthesized by the exosome, and to circular RNAs (circRNAs). We identified novel circRNAs corresponding to 5' parts of two homologous, transposase-related mRNAs. To detect preferred substrates of the exosome, the iCLIP reads were compared to the transcript abundance using RNA-Seq data. Among the strongly enriched exosome substrates were RNAs antisense to tRNAs, overlapping 3'-UTRs and RNAs containing poly(A) stretches. The majority of the read counts and crosslink sites mapped in mRNAs. Furthermore, unexpected crosslink sites clustering at 5'-ends of RNAs was detected.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, RNA targets of an exoribonuclease were analyzed by iCLIP. The data documents the role of the archaeal exosome as an exoribonuclease and RNA-tailing enzyme interacting with all RNA classes, and underlines its role in mRNA turnover, which is important for adaptation of prokaryotic cells to changing environmental conditions. The clustering of crosslink sites near 5'-ends of genes suggests simultaneous binding of both RNA ends by the S. solfataricus exosome. This may serve to prevent translation of mRNAs dedicated to degradation in 3'-5' direction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33198623
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07200-x
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-07200-x
pmc: PMC7667871
doi:
Substances chimiques
Archaeal Proteins
0
RNA, Archaeal
0
RNA
63231-63-0
Exosome Multienzyme Ribonuclease Complex
EC 3.1.-
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
797Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : Kl563/27-2
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : (RTG) 2355, project number 325443116
Références
Genome Res. 2001 Feb;11(2):240-52
pubmed: 11157787
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jan 1;30(1):207-10
pubmed: 11752295
Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):421-432
pubmed: 30020410
Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2014 Sep-Oct;5(5):623-35
pubmed: 24789718
EMBO Rep. 2005 Dec;6(12):1188-93
pubmed: 16282984
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 13;115(46):11814-11819
pubmed: 30381461
Genome Biol. 2017 Dec 28;18(1):240
pubmed: 29284540
J Biol Chem. 2008 May 16;283(20):14120-31
pubmed: 18353775
Brief Bioinform. 2018 Sep 28;19(5):803-810
pubmed: 28334140
Mol Cell. 2017 Jan 5;65(1):39-51
pubmed: 28061332
Biochemistry. 2008 Dec 16;47(50):13158-68
pubmed: 19053279
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D654-9
pubmed: 24214966
Cell. 2006 Dec 15;127(6):1223-37
pubmed: 17174896
Structure. 2000 Nov 15;8(11):1215-26
pubmed: 11080643
Mol Cell. 2005 Nov 11;20(3):461-71
pubmed: 16285927
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011 Oct;14(5):587-92
pubmed: 21945217
Mol Microbiol. 2006 Nov;62(4):1076-89
pubmed: 17078816
EMBO Rep. 2007 May;8(5):470-6
pubmed: 17380186
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013 Oct;14(10):654-60
pubmed: 23989960
EMBO Rep. 2003 Sep;4(9):889-93
pubmed: 12947419
Microbiol Spectr. 2018 Jul;6(4):
pubmed: 30006995
FEBS Lett. 2017 Dec;591(24):4039-4048
pubmed: 29159940
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 3;98(14):7835-40
pubmed: 11427726
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Apr 7;44(6):2962-73
pubmed: 26837575
J Biol Chem. 2002 Nov 29;277(48):46145-50
pubmed: 12359717
Mol Cell. 2018 Jun 7;70(5):971-982.e6
pubmed: 29804828
RNA Biol. 2014;11(2):146-55
pubmed: 24526010
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Nov 10;42(20):12691-706
pubmed: 25326320
RNA Biol. 2013 Mar;10(3):415-24
pubmed: 23324612
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Apr 20;44(7):3373-89
pubmed: 26883633
Genome Biol. 2006;7(10):R99
pubmed: 17067383
Biochimie. 2012 Jul;94(7):1578-87
pubmed: 22503705
J Bacteriol. 2000 May;182(9):2574-81
pubmed: 10762261
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005 Jul;12(7):575-81
pubmed: 15951817
EMBO J. 2017 Feb 1;36(3):374-387
pubmed: 27836995
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2011 Mar-Apr;2(2):256-76
pubmed: 21344039
Microbiology (Reading). 2003 Feb;149(Pt 2):419-430
pubmed: 12624204
FEBS Lett. 2010 Jul 2;584(13):2931-6
pubmed: 20488184
Proteomics. 2013 Oct;13(18-19):2831-50
pubmed: 23894103
mBio. 2017 Mar 28;8(2):
pubmed: 28351917
RNA. 2006 Sep;12(9):1708-20
pubmed: 16861619
Nat Chem Biol. 2017 May;13(5):522-528
pubmed: 28288106
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2014 Sep 08;47:11.12.1-34
pubmed: 25199790
Mol Microbiol. 2005 Jan;55(2):469-81
pubmed: 15659164
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jun;42(10):6603-15
pubmed: 24748659
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jul 27;45(13):7938-7949
pubmed: 28520934
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Apr;40(7):3131-42
pubmed: 22140119
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D733-45
pubmed: 26553804
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 1;106(48):20246-51
pubmed: 19910528
Methods Enzymol. 2008;447:381-416
pubmed: 19161853
Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 15;26(6):841-2
pubmed: 20110278
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2019 Oct;17(5):511-521
pubmed: 31904419
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2018 Sep 1;42(5):579-613
pubmed: 29684129
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Apr 17;48(7):3832-3847
pubmed: 32030412
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010 Jul;17(7):909-15
pubmed: 20601959
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
pubmed: 2231712
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jul;37(Web Server issue):W202-8
pubmed: 19458158
Life Sci Alliance. 2018 Aug 1;1(4):e201800080
pubmed: 30456366