Indications for, and outcomes of, end ileostomy revision procedures.
complications
ileostomy revision
outcomes
Journal
Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
ISSN: 1463-1318
Titre abrégé: Colorectal Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883611
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
revised:
30
09
2020
received:
20
07
2020
accepted:
03
10
2020
pubmed:
19
11
2020
medline:
29
11
2022
entrez:
18
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ileostomy complications have been reported in >70% of cases. Older studies have shown ileostomy revision to be required in 23%-38% of patients over a 5-10 year period. There is a paucity of recent data addressing ileostomy revision surgery. We aimed to review end ileostomy revisions in a tertiary centre and analyse indications, procedures performed, outcomes and risks for such surgery. This was a retrospective review in a single institution colorectal referral practice. All patients aged >17 years who underwent a revision of an ileostomy at our institution from 2008 to 2019 were included. Indication for ileostomy revision, operative technique (parastomal vs. intra-abdominal) and outcomes including length of stay, readmission rates, wound complications, medical complications and rate of stoma re-revision were assessed. Fifty-three patients who underwent 72 end ileostomy revision procedures were included; 20 (27.8%) were re-revision procedures. The majority (76.4%) had their original ileostomy created for inflammatory bowel disease. Indications for ileostomy revision were stoma retraction (36.1%), prolapse (22.2%), stenosis (18.1%) and parastomal hernia (29.2%). Of stoma revisions, 55.6% were performed by a parastomal approach vs. 44.4% by an intra-abdominal approach. Procedures were a combination of laparotomy, laparoscopy or both. The average length of stay was statistically significantly lower in the parastomal approach revision group (2.3 days) compared to the intra-abdominal approach revision group (10.3 days) (P < 0.001). Readmission and wound complication rates were 6.9% and 15.3%, respectively, in the intra-abdominal approach group alone. Medical complication rates were 20.8%. End ileostomy complications are common and surgical treatment may result in significant morbidity, readmission and reoperation. Patients should be counselled about these possibilities.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1352-1357Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Références
Leong AP, Londono-Schimmer EE, Phillips RK. Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy. Br J Surg. 1994;81:727-9.
Park JJ, Del Pino A, Orsay CP, Nelson RL, Pearl RK, Cintron JR, et al. Stoma complications: the Cook County Hospital experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1575-80.
Goldblatt MS, Corman ML, Haggitt RC, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Ileostomy complications requiring revision: Lahey clinic experience, 1964-1973. Dis Colon Rectum. 1977;20:209-14.
Pearl RK, Prasad ML, Orsay CP, Abcarian H, Tan AB, Melzl MT. Early local complications from intestinal stomas. Arch Surg. 1985;120:1145-7.
Salvadalena G. Incidence of complications of the stoma and peristomal skin among individuals with colostomy, ileostomy, and urostomy: a systematic review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008;35:596-607.
Weaver RM, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. Indications and outcome of reoperation for ileostomy complications in inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1988;3:38-42.
Skaerlund ML, Jacobsen L, Tøttrup A. Ileostomy revision using noncutting linear stapler. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:833-6.
Murken DR, Bleier JIS. Ostomy-related complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019;32:176-82.
Justiniano CF, Temple LK, Swanger AA, Xu Z, Speranza JR, Cellini C, et al. Readmissions with dehydration after ileostomy creation: rethinking risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61:1297-305.
Kim NE, Hall JF. Risk factors for readmission after ileostomy creation: an NSQIP database study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04549-y. [Epub ahead of print].
Beck DE. Stomal revision using abdominal wall contouring. Ochsner J. 2007;7:35-6.
Evans JP, Brown MH, Wilkes GH, Cohen Z, McLeod RS. Revising the troublesome stoma: combined abdominal wall recontouring and revision of stomas. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:122-6.
Baig MK, Larach JA, Chang S, Long C, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, et al. Outcome of parastomal hernia repair with and without midline laparotomy. Tech Coloproctol. 2006;10:282-6.
Baig MK, Wexner SD, Uriburu JC, Moscovitz I, Singh JJ, Weiss EG, et al. Is laparotomy mandatory for parastomal hernia repair? Colorectal Dis. 2000;2:229-32.