No preference for direct versus averted gaze in autistic adults: a reinforced preferential looking paradigm.
Adults
Alexithymia
Autism
Eye gaze direction
Eye-tracking
Gender
Reinforced preferential looking paradigm
Social anxiety
Social attention
Journal
Molecular autism
ISSN: 2040-2392
Titre abrégé: Mol Autism
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101534222
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 11 2020
18 11 2020
Historique:
received:
29
01
2020
accepted:
06
11
2020
entrez:
19
11
2020
pubmed:
20
11
2020
medline:
3
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With the overarching objective to gain better insights into social attention in autistic adults, the present study addresses three outstanding issues about face processing in autism. First, do autistic adults display a preference for mouths over eyes; second, do they avoid direct gaze; third, is atypical visual exploration of faces in autism mediated by gender, social anxiety or alexithymia? We used a novel reinforced preferential looking paradigm with a group of autistic adults (n = 43, 23 women) pairwise matched on age with neurotypical participants (n = 43, 21 women). Participants watched 28 different pairs of 5 s video recordings of a speaking person: the two videos, simultaneously displayed on the screen, were identical except that gaze was directed at the camera in one video and averted in the other. After a 680 ms transition phase, a short reinforcement animation appeared on the side that had displayed the direct gaze. None of the groups showed a preference for mouths over eyes. However, neurotypical participants fixated significantly more the stimuli with direct gaze, while no such preference emerged in autistic participants. As the experiment progressed, neurotypical participants also increasingly anticipated the appearance of the reinforcement, based on the location of the stimulus with the direct gaze, while no such anticipation emerged in autistic participants. Our autistic participants scored higher on the social anxiety and alexithymia questionnaires than neurotypicals. Future studies should match neurotypical and autistic participants on social anxiety and alexithymia and complement questionnaires with physiological measures of anxiety. The absence of preference for direct versus averted gaze in the autistic group is probably due to difficulties in distinguishing eye gaze direction, potentially linked to a reduced spontaneous exploration or avoidance of the eye region. Social attention and preference for direct versus averted gaze correlated with alexithymia and social anxiety scores, but not gender.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
With the overarching objective to gain better insights into social attention in autistic adults, the present study addresses three outstanding issues about face processing in autism. First, do autistic adults display a preference for mouths over eyes; second, do they avoid direct gaze; third, is atypical visual exploration of faces in autism mediated by gender, social anxiety or alexithymia?
METHODS
We used a novel reinforced preferential looking paradigm with a group of autistic adults (n = 43, 23 women) pairwise matched on age with neurotypical participants (n = 43, 21 women). Participants watched 28 different pairs of 5 s video recordings of a speaking person: the two videos, simultaneously displayed on the screen, were identical except that gaze was directed at the camera in one video and averted in the other. After a 680 ms transition phase, a short reinforcement animation appeared on the side that had displayed the direct gaze.
RESULTS
None of the groups showed a preference for mouths over eyes. However, neurotypical participants fixated significantly more the stimuli with direct gaze, while no such preference emerged in autistic participants. As the experiment progressed, neurotypical participants also increasingly anticipated the appearance of the reinforcement, based on the location of the stimulus with the direct gaze, while no such anticipation emerged in autistic participants.
LIMITATIONS
Our autistic participants scored higher on the social anxiety and alexithymia questionnaires than neurotypicals. Future studies should match neurotypical and autistic participants on social anxiety and alexithymia and complement questionnaires with physiological measures of anxiety.
CONCLUSIONS
The absence of preference for direct versus averted gaze in the autistic group is probably due to difficulties in distinguishing eye gaze direction, potentially linked to a reduced spontaneous exploration or avoidance of the eye region. Social attention and preference for direct versus averted gaze correlated with alexithymia and social anxiety scores, but not gender.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33208193
doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00398-3
pii: 10.1186/s13229-020-00398-3
pmc: PMC7672906
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
91Références
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Apr;16(4):231-9
pubmed: 22425667
J Neurodev Disord. 2019 Apr 13;11(1):5
pubmed: 30981277
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(6):1429-36
pubmed: 18179852
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Feb;48(2):147-51
pubmed: 19863948
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 May;42:279-97
pubmed: 24694721
Child Dev. 2009 Jul-Aug;80(4):1134-46
pubmed: 19630898
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(6):980-986
pubmed: 29947310
Neuroimage. 2011 May 1;56(1):354-62
pubmed: 21334443
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Nov;47:410-30
pubmed: 25277283
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Jun;24(6):1485-92
pubmed: 23324559
J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 May;46(5):1538-52
pubmed: 24150885
J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 Mar;41(3):364-71
pubmed: 20559702
J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Jan;23(1):93-103
pubmed: 18534814
Autism. 2016 May;20(4):442-62
pubmed: 26134030
Autism. 2016 Feb;20(2):163-71
pubmed: 25769313
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 May;45(5):1368-79
pubmed: 25358250
J Autism Dev Disord. 2004 Apr;34(2):163-75
pubmed: 15162935
J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 15;30(37):12281-7
pubmed: 20844124
Autism Res. 2017 May;10(5):810-820
pubmed: 28244277
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Feb;47(2):506-513
pubmed: 27878742
J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Apr;42(4):606-18
pubmed: 21590432
J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 Mar;38(3):574-80
pubmed: 17968644
Biol Psychol. 2017 Jan;122:42-50
pubmed: 26656287
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 May;64:78-86
pubmed: 28376324
J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 Oct;38(9):1785-90
pubmed: 18306031
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Apr;45(4):1119-20
pubmed: 25239177
Brain. 2010 May;133(Pt 5):1515-25
pubmed: 20371509
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Dec;47(12):4025-4031
pubmed: 28889215
Mol Autism. 2016 Mar 23;7:19
pubmed: 27011784
J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Jan-Feb;105(1-2):20-37
pubmed: 19906386
Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Sep 03;3:340-51
pubmed: 24273718
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 23;7:1245
pubmed: 27602006
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Aug;43(6):1055-65
pubmed: 25434325
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 17;7(1):13378
pubmed: 29042641
Depress Anxiety. 2013 Aug;30(8):749-56
pubmed: 23798359
Cognition. 2020 Feb;195:104113
pubmed: 31710869
J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 Nov;41(11):1556-64
pubmed: 21298331
J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Feb;43(2):286-300
pubmed: 22696196
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 15;46(1):137-47
pubmed: 17920642
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(9):2423-30
pubmed: 18402988
J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Oct;42(10):2208-18
pubmed: 22278030
J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):23-32
pubmed: 8126686
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Jan;48:79-93
pubmed: 26547134
Cognition. 2014 Oct;133(1):120-7
pubmed: 25014360
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Dec;47(12):3814-3821
pubmed: 28000078
Autism Res. 2018 Sep;11(9):1264-1275
pubmed: 30403327
Neuropsychol Rev. 2010 Sep;20(3):290-322
pubmed: 20809200
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2006 Dec;1(3):194-202
pubmed: 18985106
J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 Feb;41(2):158-67
pubmed: 20503068
Autism. 2017 Jan;21(1):100-107
pubmed: 27132008
Mol Autism. 2019 Jun 28;10:28
pubmed: 31297179
J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 Jan;50(1):308-318
pubmed: 31621020
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;55:80-89
pubmed: 30399531
Autism. 2018 May;22(4):502-512
pubmed: 28423919
Cortex. 2016 Aug;81:215-20
pubmed: 27253723
Autism Res. 2020 May;13(5):763-776
pubmed: 31799774
Cognition. 2015 Oct;143:108-14
pubmed: 26133642
Child Indic Res. 2016;9:233-245
pubmed: 26925177
J Child Lang. 2015 Nov;42(6):1173-90
pubmed: 25403090
J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Jan;46(1):305-314
pubmed: 26249261
J Autism Dev Disord. 2002 Aug;32(4):249-61
pubmed: 12199131
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Oct;45:184-197
pubmed: 27639066
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Nov;82(2):180-7
pubmed: 21893108
Cognition. 2011 May;119(2):307-11
pubmed: 21316650
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Mar;47(4):1004-12
pubmed: 19027761
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Sep;80:488-515
pubmed: 28698082
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):163-6
pubmed: 24484764
Psychol Med. 2015 Apr;45(5):897-910
pubmed: 25126858
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Dec;45(12):3949-60
pubmed: 26243138
Autism. 2006 Jul;10(4):403-14
pubmed: 16908482
Child Indic Res. 2016;9:771-784
pubmed: 27489572
J Neurosci. 2012 Jul 11;32(28):9469-76
pubmed: 22787032
J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 May;37(5):929-39
pubmed: 17006775
Health Educ Res. 1997 Sep;12(3):385-97
pubmed: 10174221
Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry. 1987;22:141-73
pubmed: 2885745
J Autism Dev Disord. 2008 Aug;38(7):1371-81
pubmed: 18297386
Autism Res. 2014 Oct;7(5):590-7
pubmed: 24962761
Cognition. 2019 Mar;184:28-43
pubmed: 30557748
Autism. 2013 Nov;17(6):754-61
pubmed: 22987893
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Apr;49(4):1342-1351
pubmed: 30467821
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;53(4):420-30
pubmed: 22029480
J Autism Dev Disord. 2001 Feb;31(1):5-17
pubmed: 11439754
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Mar;201(2):155-65
pubmed: 19798489
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 28;358(1430):325-34
pubmed: 12639330
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Sep;56:348-53
pubmed: 26192103
J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Nov;43(11):2536-48
pubmed: 23471478
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Dec 16;7:872
pubmed: 24379776
Transl Psychiatry. 2013 Jul 23;3:e285
pubmed: 23880881
Neuroreport. 2000 Sep 11;11(13):2931-5
pubmed: 11006968
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;59(9):809-16
pubmed: 12215080
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 7;11(1):3959
pubmed: 32770077
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;55(3):188-95.e1
pubmed: 26903252
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2629
pubmed: 30619019