Psycholinguistic mechanisms of classifier processing in sign language.


Journal

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
ISSN: 1939-1285
Titre abrégé: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8207540

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 20 11 2020
medline: 25 9 2021
entrez: 19 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Nonsigners viewing sign language are sometimes able to guess the meaning of signs by relying on the overt connection between form and meaning, or iconicity (cf. Ortega, Özyürek, & Peeters, 2020; Strickland et al., 2015). One word class in sign languages that appears to be highly iconic is classifiers: verb-like signs that can refer to location change or handling. Classifier use and meaning are governed by linguistic rules, yet in comparison with lexical verb signs, classifiers are highly variable in their morpho-phonology (variety of potential handshapes and motion direction within the sign). These open-class linguistic items in sign languages prompt a question about the mechanisms of their processing: Are they part of a gestural-semiotic system (processed like the gestures of nonsigners), or are they processed as linguistic verbs? To examine the psychological mechanisms of classifier comprehension, we recorded the electroencephalogram (EEG) activity of signers who watched videos of signed sentences with classifiers. We manipulated the sentence word order of the stimuli (subject-object-verb [SOV] vs. object-subject-verb [OSV]), contrasting the two conditions, which, according to different processing hypotheses, should incur increased processing costs for OSV orders. As previously reported for lexical signs, we observed an N400 effect for OSV compared with SOV, reflecting increased cognitive load for linguistic processing. These findings support the hypothesis that classifiers are a linguistic part of speech in sign language, extending the current understanding of processing mechanisms at the interface of linguistic form and meaning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Identifiants

pubmed: 33211523
pii: 2020-86317-001
doi: 10.1037/xlm0000958
pmc: PMC8272559
mid: NIHMS1715928
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

998-1011

Subventions

Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC014498
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Science Foundation
Organisme : NIH HHS
Pays : United States

Références

Lang Speech. 2019 Dec;62(4):652-680
pubmed: 30354860
Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 1;24(3):832-40
pubmed: 15652318
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 12;112(19):5968-73
pubmed: 25918419
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Aug;19(8):1259-74
pubmed: 17651001
Brain Lang. 1999 Feb 1;66(2):233-48
pubmed: 10190988
Lang Speech. 2018 Mar;61(1):97-112
pubmed: 28565932
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001 Jun;25(4):355-73
pubmed: 11445140
Brain Lang. 2009 Mar;108(3):145-58
pubmed: 18945484
Neuroinformatics. 2014 Jan;12(1):143-79
pubmed: 23912508
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Apr;25(4):517-33
pubmed: 23249348
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jul;20(4):786-803
pubmed: 8064247
Neuroimage. 2002 Oct;17(2):812-24
pubmed: 12377156
Cognition. 2013 Oct;129(1):1-17
pubmed: 23792806
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 10;7:1146
pubmed: 27559320
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Oct;9(4):456-79
pubmed: 1464675
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Feb;83(2):176-90
pubmed: 22019481
Brain Lang. 2005 Aug;94(2):233-48
pubmed: 15896396
Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;113(4):787-821
pubmed: 17014303
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(2):214-29
pubmed: 14644107
Brain Lang. 2008 May;105(2):112-33
pubmed: 17996287
Brain Lang. 2013 Apr;125(1):60-76
pubmed: 23454075
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 15;112(37):11684-9
pubmed: 26283352
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2128-48
pubmed: 17573239
Brain Res. 2018 Jul 15;1691:105-117
pubmed: 29627484
J Psycholinguist Res. 2012 Oct;41(5):323-45
pubmed: 22120140
Front Psychol. 2014 May 27;5:484
pubmed: 24904497
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 May 26;106(21):8784-9
pubmed: 19433795
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Oct 1;14(7):1064-75
pubmed: 12419129
Neurosci Lett. 2010 Feb 26;471(1):48-52
pubmed: 20079804
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Nov;12(11):432-40
pubmed: 18805728
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):111-8
pubmed: 22750056
Nature. 1984 Jan 12-18;307(5947):161-3
pubmed: 6690995
Top Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;7(1):81-94
pubmed: 25408329
BMC Neurosci. 2014 May 10;15:62
pubmed: 24884527
Cognition. 2017 Jan;158:189-207
pubmed: 27837693
Cogn Neurodyn. 2015 Jun;9(3):317-29
pubmed: 25972980
Neurocase. 2015;21(6):753-66
pubmed: 25529497
Mem Cognit. 1990 Jul;18(4):380-93
pubmed: 2381317
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2008 Winter;13(1):3-20
pubmed: 17602162
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 Apr;55(4):468-84
pubmed: 6187540
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jan;47(2):382-7
pubmed: 18929583
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Mar;46(3):403-415
pubmed: 31192681

Auteurs

Julia Krebs (J)

Research Group Neurobiology of Language, Department of Linguistics, University of Salzburg.

Evie Malaia (E)

Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama.

Ronnie B Wilbur (RB)

Department of Linguistics, Purdue University.

Dietmar Roehm (D)

Research Group Neurobiology of Language, Department of Linguistics, University of Salzburg.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH