Denosumab Safety and Efficacy Among Participants in the FREEDOM Extension Study With Mild to Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Density
Bone Density Conservation Agents
/ administration & dosage
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Cross-Over Studies
Denosumab
/ administration & dosage
Double-Blind Method
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fractures, Bone
/ chemically induced
Global Health
Humans
Hypocalcemia
/ chemically induced
Middle Aged
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
/ chemically induced
Prognosis
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
/ drug therapy
bone mineral density
chronic kidney disease
denosumab
fracture
safety
Journal
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
ISSN: 1945-7197
Titre abrégé: J Clin Endocrinol Metab
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0375362
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 01 2021
23 01 2021
Historique:
received:
08
04
2020
pubmed:
20
11
2020
medline:
21
9
2021
entrez:
19
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The effects of long-term exposure to denosumab in individuals with renal insufficiency are unknown. This post hoc analysis evaluates the long-term safety and efficacy of denosumab in individuals with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD) (stages 2 and 3) using data from the pivotal phase 3, double-blind, 3-year FREEDOM (NCT00089791) and open-label, 7-year extension (NCT00523341) studies. Women age 60 to 90 years with a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score of less than -2.5 to greater than -4.0 at the total hip or lumbar spine were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months (long-term arm) or placebo (cross-over arm) in FREEDOM; eligible participants could enroll in the extension to receive denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months. Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from study baseline and annualized rates of fracture and adverse events (AEs) were the main outcome measures. Most participants (1259/1969 [64%] long-term arm; 1173/1781 [66%] crossover arm) with baseline CKD stage 2 or 3 remained within the same CKD subgroup at study completion; less than 3% progressed to CKD stage 4. Participants in all eGFR subgroups showed similar, persistent BMD gains over time and a low incidence of fractures. The percentage of participants reporting serious AEs was similar among renal subgroups (normal, CKD stage 2, CKD stage 3a, CKD stage 3b) both for the long-term (54% vs 52% vs 57% vs 58%) and crossover (43% vs 42% vs 43% vs 68%) arms, except CKD stage 3b subgroup, crossover arm. The safety and efficacy of denosumab did not differ among participants with mild to moderate CKD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33211870
pii: 5992310
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa851
pmc: PMC7823314
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bone Density Conservation Agents
0
Denosumab
4EQZ6YO2HI
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00523341', 'NCT00089791']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
397-409Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.
Références
Cleve Clin J Med. 2009 Dec;76(12):715-23
pubmed: 19952296
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Feb;33(2):190-198
pubmed: 29105841
J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Jan;24(1):153-61
pubmed: 18767928
J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Aug;19(8):1241-9
pubmed: 15231010
Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2011 Sep;1(4):136-141
pubmed: 25018912
J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Aug;26(8):1829-35
pubmed: 21491487
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Nov;17(11):3223-32
pubmed: 17005938
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):1738-1746
pubmed: 29915131
J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Nov;12(11):1761-8
pubmed: 9383679
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jan 22;167(2):133-9
pubmed: 17242313
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Jan;18(1):282-6
pubmed: 17167115
Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Feb;39(2 Suppl 1):S1-266
pubmed: 11904577
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):1274-1278
pubmed: 27255807
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 2;157(7):471-81
pubmed: 23027318
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 May 1;104(5):1753-1765
pubmed: 30535289
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2015 Jul;24(4):317-23
pubmed: 26050117
J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Oct;28(10):2049-59
pubmed: 23907861
J Nephrol. 2017 Apr;30(2):271-279
pubmed: 27394428
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Dec;23(12):2863-71
pubmed: 22398855
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Nov;3 Suppl 3:S140-50
pubmed: 18988699
Am J Nephrol. 2015;41(2):129-37
pubmed: 25790847
J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Dec;20(12):2105-15
pubmed: 16294264
Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jul;56(1):57-68
pubmed: 20347511
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Oct 4;165(7):473-481
pubmed: 27479614
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Jul;7(7):1130-6
pubmed: 22516286
Case Rep Nephrol. 2018 Nov 4;2018:7384763
pubmed: 30519493
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Jul;5(7):513-523
pubmed: 28546097
Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2017 Jul;7(1):1-59
pubmed: 30675420
N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):756-65
pubmed: 19671655
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):962-969
pubmed: 29487093
J Bone Miner Res. 2016 Oct;31(10):1803-1809
pubmed: 27145189
Bone. 2006 Feb;38(2 Suppl 1):S4-9
pubmed: 16455317
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Mar;16(3):332-8
pubmed: 15241585
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016 Jan;23(1):19-28
pubmed: 26709059
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Dec;16(12):1683-90
pubmed: 15933802
J Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;35(3):488-97
pubmed: 18260172
J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Apr;22(4):503-8
pubmed: 17243862
J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Jul;27(7):1471-9
pubmed: 22461041
Osteoporos Int. 2003 Jul;14(7):570-6
pubmed: 12844211
Kidney Int. 2000 Jul;58(1):396-9
pubmed: 10886587