Perioperative fluid management in esophagectomy for cancer and its relation to postoperative respiratory complications.


Journal

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus
ISSN: 1442-2050
Titre abrégé: Dis Esophagus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8809160

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 13 05 2020
revised: 17 07 2020
accepted: 01 09 2020
pubmed: 20 11 2020
medline: 29 7 2021
entrez: 19 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The optimal perioperative fluid management during esophagectomy is still not clear. Liberal regimens have been associated with higher morbidity and respiratory complications. Restrictive regimens might raise concerns for kidney function and increase the need to associate vasopressors. The aim of this study was to investigate retrospectively the perioperative fluid administration during esophagectomy and to correlate this with postoperative respiratory outcome. All patients who underwent esophagectomy between January and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient characteristics, type of surgery and postoperative course were reviewed. Fluid administration and vasopressor use were calculated intraoperatively and during the postoperative stay at the recovery unit. Fluid overload was defined as a positive fluid balance of more than 125 mL/m2/h during the first 24 hours. Patients were divided in 3 groups: GRP0 (no fluid overload/no vasopressors); GRP1 (no fluid overload/need for vasopressors); GRP2 (fluid overload with/without vasopressors). Postoperative complications were prospectively recorded according to Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group criteria. A total of 103 patients were analyzed: 35 (34%) GRP0, 50 (49%) GRP1 and 18 (17%) GRP2. No significant differences were found for age, treatment (neoadjuvant vs. primary), type of surgery (open/minimally invasive), histology nor comorbidities. There were significant (P ≤ 0.001) differences in fluid balance/m2/h (75 ± 21 mL; 86 ± 22 mL and 144 ± 20 mL) across GRP0, GRP1 and GRP2, respectively. We found differences in respiratory complications (GRP0 (20%) versus GRP1 (42%; P = 0.034) and GRP0 (20%) versus GRP2 (61%; P = 0.002)) and "Comprehensive Complications Index" (GRP0 (20.5) versus GRP1 (34.6; P = 0.015) and GRP0 (20.5) versus GRP2 (35.1; P = 0.009)). Multivariable analysis (binary logistic regression) for "any respiratory complication" was performed. Patients who received fluid overload (GRP2) had a 10.24 times higher risk to develop postoperative respiratory complications. When patients received vasopressors alone (GRP1), the chances of developing these complications were 3.57 times higher compared to GRP0. Among patients undergoing esophagectomy, there is a wide variety in the administration of fluid during the first 24 hours. There was a higher incidence of respiratory complications when patients received higher amounts of fluid or when vasopressors were used. We believe that a personalized and protocolized fluid administration algorithm should be implemented and that individual risk factors should be identified.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33212482
pii: 5992355
doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa111
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Eleni Van Dessel (E)

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Johnny Moons (J)

Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Philippe Nafteux (P)

Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Hans Van Veer (H)

Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Lieven Depypere (L)

Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Willy Coosemans (W)

Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Toni Lerut (T)

Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Steve Coppens (S)

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anesthesia and Algology Unit, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Arne Neyrinck (A)

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anesthesia and Algology Unit, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH