Mealtime verbal interactions among nursing home staff and residents with dementia: A secondary behavioural analysis of videotaped observations.

behavioural coding communication dementia dyadic interactions mealtime nursing nursing home staff verbal videos

Journal

Journal of advanced nursing
ISSN: 1365-2648
Titre abrégé: J Adv Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7609811

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 13 04 2020
revised: 25 09 2020
accepted: 27 10 2020
pubmed: 23 11 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 22 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To characterize dyadic mealtime verbal interactions and examine the associations with staff and resident characteristics. A secondary analysis of 110 videotaped mealtime observations collected from a dementia communication trial during 2011-2014. Videos involved 25 residents with dementia and 29 staff in nine nursing homes. Verbal behaviours (utterances) were coded during 2018-2019 using the Cue Utilization and Engagement in Dementia mealtime video-coding scheme, addressing eight positive behaviours and four negative behaviours. Bivariate analyses and multivariate regression models were used. Staff spoke three times more frequently (76.5%) than residents (23.5%). Nearly all staff utterances were positive (99.2%); 85.1% of residents' utterances were positive and 14.9% negative. Staff positive utterances were correlated with their negative utterances and resident positive and negative utterances. Staff negative utterances were correlated with resident negative utterances. Resident positive and negative utterances were correlated. Resident positive utterances were significantly associated with staff care-giving length in the current nursing home (OR = 1.430, 95% CI = 1.008, 2.027). Resident negative utterances were significantly associated with resident gender (female versus male, OR = 11.892, 95% CI = 1.237, 114.289) and staff years worked as a caregiver (OR = 0.838, 95% CI = 0.710, 0.989). Staff positive and negative utterances were not associated significantly with any participant characteristics. Staff engage residents using primarily positive verbal strategies. Staff-resident mealtime verbal interactions were dynamic, interactive, and complex and related to multiple individual characteristics. Positive dyadic mealtime interactions are critical to engage residents in eating. Little work has characterized dyadic mealtime interactions, limiting the development of effective interventions. Findings showed staff-resident mealtime verbal interactions were primarily positive, inter-related, and associated with multiple individual characteristics. Findings inform directions to improve mealtime care practice and develop person-centred mealtime interventions targeting modifiable factors, including staff care-giving experiences. 目的: 描述二元进餐时的言语互动, 并检查工作人员和养老院患者病症的相关性。 设计: 对2011-2014年痴呆症交流试验过程中收集的110个用餐时间录像观察进行二次分析。 方法: 视频涉及25名养老院痴呆患者和9家养老院的29名工作人员。2018-2019年间, 研究人员利用痴呆患者用餐时间视频编码方案中的线索利用和参与要求对言语行为(话语)进行编码, 共处理8种积极行为和4种消极行为。采用双变量分析和多元回归模型。 结果: 工作人员的说话频率 (76.5%) 是养老院患者(23.5%) 的三倍。几乎所有工作人员都积极谈话(99.2%) ; 85.1%的养老院患者积极谈话,而14.9%的养老院患者消极谈话。工作人员的话语积极性与其话语消极性、患者的话语积极性和患者的话语消极性相关。工作人员的话语消极性与养老院患者的话语消极性相关。养老院患者的话语积极性和消极性相关。养老院患者的话语积极性与目前疗养院工作人员的护理时间显著相关 (OR=1.430,95%CI=1.008,2.027) 。养老院患者的话语消极性与其性别 (女性对比男性, OR=11.892,95%CI=1.237114.289) 和护理人员工作年限 (OR=0.838,95%CI=0.710,0.989) 显著相关。工作人员的话语积极性和消极性与参与者特征无显著相关。 结论: 工作人员主要通过积极的语言策略来引起养老院患者注意。工作人员--养老院患者的进餐言语互动具有动态、互动、复杂的特点,得益于复杂的个人特征。 影响: 积极的二元进餐互动对养老院患者进餐至关重要。目前, 鲜有研究对进餐时的互动进行描述, 致使有效干预措施的采取受限。研究结果显示, 工作人员与养老院患者在进餐时的言语互动以积极、相互关联为主, 并且与复杂的个人特征相关。研究结果可为进餐护理实践的改进和以人为本的进餐干预措施的制定提供指导, 此类干预措施主要针对可改变的因素, 包括工作人员的护理经验。.

Autres résumés

Type: Publisher (chi)
目的: 描述二元进餐时的言语互动, 并检查工作人员和养老院患者病症的相关性。 设计: 对2011-2014年痴呆症交流试验过程中收集的110个用餐时间录像观察进行二次分析。 方法: 视频涉及25名养老院痴呆患者和9家养老院的29名工作人员。2018-2019年间, 研究人员利用痴呆患者用餐时间视频编码方案中的线索利用和参与要求对言语行为(话语)进行编码, 共处理8种积极行为和4种消极行为。采用双变量分析和多元回归模型。 结果: 工作人员的说话频率 (76.5%) 是养老院患者(23.5%) 的三倍。几乎所有工作人员都积极谈话(99.2%) ; 85.1%的养老院患者积极谈话,而14.9%的养老院患者消极谈话。工作人员的话语积极性与其话语消极性、患者的话语积极性和患者的话语消极性相关。工作人员的话语消极性与养老院患者的话语消极性相关。养老院患者的话语积极性和消极性相关。养老院患者的话语积极性与目前疗养院工作人员的护理时间显著相关 (OR=1.430,95%CI=1.008,2.027) 。养老院患者的话语消极性与其性别 (女性对比男性, OR=11.892,95%CI=1.237114.289) 和护理人员工作年限 (OR=0.838,95%CI=0.710,0.989) 显著相关。工作人员的话语积极性和消极性与参与者特征无显著相关。 结论: 工作人员主要通过积极的语言策略来引起养老院患者注意。工作人员--养老院患者的进餐言语互动具有动态、互动、复杂的特点,得益于复杂的个人特征。 影响: 积极的二元进餐互动对养老院患者进餐至关重要。目前, 鲜有研究对进餐时的互动进行描述, 致使有效干预措施的采取受限。研究结果显示, 工作人员与养老院患者在进餐时的言语互动以积极、相互关联为主, 并且与复杂的个人特征相关。研究结果可为进餐护理实践的改进和以人为本的进餐干预措施的制定提供指导, 此类干预措施主要针对可改变的因素, 包括工作人员的护理经验。.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33222218
doi: 10.1111/jan.14647
pmc: PMC7902310
mid: NIHMS1644110
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1244-1257

Subventions

Organisme : American Nurses Foundation
Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : R01 NR011455
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institute of Aging at National Institute of Health
ID : R03AG063170
Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : P30 NR014139
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R03 AG063170
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institute of health/National Institute of Nursing Research
ID : NR011455-04
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K23 AG066856
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institute of health/National Institute of Nursing Research
ID : 1P30 NR014139

Informations de copyright

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

J Clin Nurs. 2010 Mar;19(5-6):621-31
pubmed: 20500303
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103654
pubmed: 32535342
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Aug;96:18-26
pubmed: 30660444
Int Psychogeriatr. 1992;4 Suppl 1:55-69
pubmed: 1504288
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Feb;114:103824
pubmed: 33352436
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Oct;61(10):1692-7
pubmed: 24083403
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Dec;76(12):3609-3622
pubmed: 32996629
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Jan;19(1-2):53-9
pubmed: 20500244
J Nurs Meas. 1993 Spring;1(1):41-55
pubmed: 7828046
J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(3):400-406
pubmed: 29484354
Alzheimers Dement. 2020 Mar 10;:
pubmed: 32157811
J Nutr Elder. 2009 Oct;28(4):327-47
pubmed: 21184376
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Nov;27(11):1861-73
pubmed: 26165352
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jan;51(1):14-27
pubmed: 23340328
J Nutr Health Aging. 2012 Mar;16(3):258-61
pubmed: 22456783
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
J Clin Nurs. 2010 Jan;19(1-2):33-41
pubmed: 20500242
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7-8):2158-2171
pubmed: 30590990
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 Sep;57(5):P461-8
pubmed: 12198105
Geriatr Nurs. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2 Suppl):S10-5
pubmed: 25784080
Behav Ther. 2011 Mar;42(1):89-99
pubmed: 21292055
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;18(11):941-947
pubmed: 28668663
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Aug;20(15-16):2153-61
pubmed: 21521391
Nurs Open. 2019 Mar 06;6(3):772-782
pubmed: 31367399
Gerontologist. 2017 Aug 1;57(4):707-718
pubmed: 27048705
Gerontologist. 2015 Jun;55 Suppl 1:S61-6
pubmed: 26055782
Dementia (London). 2020 Aug;19(6):2090-2113
pubmed: 30482090
Geriatr Nurs. 2018 May - Jun;39(3):330-335
pubmed: 29310831
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012 Jul;12(3):481-90
pubmed: 22233202
J Appl Gerontol. 2013 Sep;32(6):687-707
pubmed: 25474794
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Feb;72(2):348-60
pubmed: 26552367
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jun;71:70-79
pubmed: 28340390
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Dec;16(12):1062-8
pubmed: 26255100
Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Mar;8(1):3-15
pubmed: 10347857
Gerontologist. 2013 Aug;53(4):687-98
pubmed: 23114564
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2020 Jan-Dec;35:1533317519863259
pubmed: 31327235
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015 Jan;18(1):17-23
pubmed: 25394167
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 22;12(2):e0171770
pubmed: 28225776

Auteurs

Wen Liu (W)

College of Nursing, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Kristine Williams (K)

School of Nursing, The University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Melissa Batchelor (M)

School of Nursing, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Yelena Perkhounkova (Y)

College of Nursing, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Maria Hein (M)

College of Nursing, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH