Differential impact of BTK active site inhibitors on the conformational state of full-length BTK.


Journal

eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 11 2020
Historique:
received: 27 06 2020
accepted: 20 11 2020
pubmed: 24 11 2020
medline: 9 2 2021
entrez: 23 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is targeted in the treatment of B-cell disorders including leukemias and lymphomas. Currently approved BTK inhibitors, including Ibrutinib, a first-in-class covalent inhibitor of BTK, bind directly to the kinase active site. While effective at blocking the catalytic activity of BTK, consequences of drug binding on the global conformation of full-length BTK are unknown. Here, we uncover a range of conformational effects in full-length BTK induced by a panel of active site inhibitors, including large-scale shifts in the conformational equilibria of the regulatory domains. Additionally, we find that a remote Ibrutinib resistance mutation, T316A in the BTK SH2 domain, drives spurious BTK activity by destabilizing the compact autoinhibitory conformation of full-length BTK, shifting the conformational ensemble away from the autoinhibited form. Future development of BTK inhibitors will need to consider long-range allosteric consequences of inhibitor binding, including the emerging application of these BTK inhibitors in treating COVID-19. Treatments for blood cancers, such as leukemia and lymphoma, rely heavily on chemotherapy, using drugs that target a vulnerable aspect of the cancer cells. B-cells, a type of white blood cell that produces antibodies, require a protein called Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, or BTK for short, to survive. The drug ibrutinib (Imbruvica) is used to treat B-cell cancers by blocking BTK. The BTK protein consists of several regions. One of them, known as the kinase domain, is responsible for its activity as an enzyme (which allows it to modify other proteins by adding a ‘tag’ known as a phosphate group). The other regions of BTK, known as regulatory modules, control this activity. In BTK’s inactive form, the regulatory modules attach to the kinase domain, blocking the regulatory modules from interacting with other proteins. When BTK is activated, it changes its conformation so the regulatory regions detach and become available for interactions with other proteins, at the same time exposing the active kinase domain. Ibrutinib and other BTK drugs in development bind to the kinase domain to block its activity. However, it is not known how this binding affects the regulatory modules. Previous efforts to study how drugs bind to BTK have used a version of the protein that only had the kinase domain, instead of the full-length protein. Now, Joseph et al. have studied full-length BTK and how it binds to five different drugs. The results reveal that ibrutinib and another drug called dasatinib both indirectly disrupt the normal position of the regulatory domains pushing BTK toward a conformation that resembles the activated state. By contrast, the three other compounds studied do not affect the inactive structure. Joseph et al. also examined a mutation in BTK that confers resistance against ibrutinib. This mutation increases the activity of BTK by disrupting the inactive structure, leading to B cells surviving better. Understanding how drug resistance mechanisms can work will lead to better drug treatment strategies for cancer. BTK is also a target in other diseases such as allergies or asthma and even COVID-19. If interactions between partner proteins and the regulatory domain are important in these diseases, then they may be better treated with drugs that maintain the regulatory modules in their inactive state. This research will help to design drugs that are better able to control BTK activity.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Treatments for blood cancers, such as leukemia and lymphoma, rely heavily on chemotherapy, using drugs that target a vulnerable aspect of the cancer cells. B-cells, a type of white blood cell that produces antibodies, require a protein called Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, or BTK for short, to survive. The drug ibrutinib (Imbruvica) is used to treat B-cell cancers by blocking BTK. The BTK protein consists of several regions. One of them, known as the kinase domain, is responsible for its activity as an enzyme (which allows it to modify other proteins by adding a ‘tag’ known as a phosphate group). The other regions of BTK, known as regulatory modules, control this activity. In BTK’s inactive form, the regulatory modules attach to the kinase domain, blocking the regulatory modules from interacting with other proteins. When BTK is activated, it changes its conformation so the regulatory regions detach and become available for interactions with other proteins, at the same time exposing the active kinase domain. Ibrutinib and other BTK drugs in development bind to the kinase domain to block its activity. However, it is not known how this binding affects the regulatory modules. Previous efforts to study how drugs bind to BTK have used a version of the protein that only had the kinase domain, instead of the full-length protein. Now, Joseph et al. have studied full-length BTK and how it binds to five different drugs. The results reveal that ibrutinib and another drug called dasatinib both indirectly disrupt the normal position of the regulatory domains pushing BTK toward a conformation that resembles the activated state. By contrast, the three other compounds studied do not affect the inactive structure. Joseph et al. also examined a mutation in BTK that confers resistance against ibrutinib. This mutation increases the activity of BTK by disrupting the inactive structure, leading to B cells surviving better. Understanding how drug resistance mechanisms can work will lead to better drug treatment strategies for cancer. BTK is also a target in other diseases such as allergies or asthma and even COVID-19. If interactions between partner proteins and the regulatory domain are important in these diseases, then they may be better treated with drugs that maintain the regulatory modules in their inactive state. This research will help to design drugs that are better able to control BTK activity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33226337
doi: 10.7554/eLife.60470
pii: 60470
pmc: PMC7834017
doi:
pii:

Substances chimiques

Piperidines 0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors 0
ibrutinib 1X70OSD4VX
Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase EC 2.7.10.2
Adenine JAC85A2161
Dasatinib RBZ1571X5H

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI043957
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
ID : AI43957
Pays : International

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2020, Joseph et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

RJ, NA, DF, JE, TW, AA No competing interests declared

Références

Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:549-600
pubmed: 15771581
Elife. 2015 Feb 20;4:
pubmed: 25699547
ACS Chem Biol. 2014 Aug 15;9(8):1894-905
pubmed: 24946274
Hematol Oncol. 2020 Apr;38(2):129-136
pubmed: 31732977
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D447-56
pubmed: 26527722
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 12;105(6):2070-5
pubmed: 18227510
Oncotarget. 2016 Oct 18;7(42):68833-68841
pubmed: 27626698
Semin Immunol. 1995 Aug;7(4):237-46
pubmed: 8520028
J Med Chem. 2012 Jul 26;55(14):6243-62
pubmed: 22621397
Drug Discov Today. 2018 Mar;23(3):727-735
pubmed: 29337202
Immunol Rev. 2009 Mar;228(1):58-73
pubmed: 19290921
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Aug;74(8):1603-11
pubmed: 24764451
J Biomol NMR. 1994 Sep;4(5):603-14
pubmed: 22911360
Eur J Immunol. 2007 Apr;37(4):1033-42
pubmed: 17372989
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 9;372(15):1430-40
pubmed: 25853747
Structure. 2017 Oct 3;25(10):1481-1494.e4
pubmed: 28867612
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 19;110(47):E4437-45
pubmed: 24191057
J Hematol Oncol. 2016 Sep 02;9(1):80
pubmed: 27590878
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Oct;1854(10 Pt B):1567-74
pubmed: 25891902
Protein Sci. 2011 Feb;20(2):428-36
pubmed: 21280133
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 1;31(1):88-94
pubmed: 23045577
J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Jan 17;140(2):675-682
pubmed: 29256600
Br J Pharmacol. 2015 Jun;172(11):2675-700
pubmed: 25630872
Drugs Aging. 2017 Jul;34(7):509-527
pubmed: 28536906
Pharmacol Res. 2016 Jan;103:26-48
pubmed: 26529477
Arch Pharm Res. 2019 Feb;42(2):171-181
pubmed: 30706214
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 8;369(6):507-16
pubmed: 23782157
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 23;105(38):14377-82
pubmed: 18787129
Nat Commun. 2017 Dec 18;8(1):2160
pubmed: 29255153
Mol Immunol. 2011 Jun;48(11):1287-91
pubmed: 21195477
Biochemistry. 2007 May 8;46(18):5455-62
pubmed: 17425330
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2012 Apr;341(1):90-103
pubmed: 22228807
Future Oncol. 2014 May;10(6):957-67
pubmed: 24941982
Science. 2020 Oct 9;370(6513):
pubmed: 33004676
Biochemistry. 2017 Jun 13;56(23):2938-2949
pubmed: 28516764
J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Feb 7;140(5):1863-1869
pubmed: 29319304
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 02;6:30832
pubmed: 27480221
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 12;370(24):2352-4
pubmed: 24869597
Oncol Rep. 2019 Dec;42(6):2213-2227
pubmed: 31638169
Biophys J. 2020 Nov 3;119(9):1833-1848
pubmed: 33086047
Cancer Cell. 2014 Jul 14;26(1):11-3
pubmed: 25026208
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 22;116(43):21539-21544
pubmed: 31591208
J Med Chem. 2019 Sep 12;62(17):7923-7940
pubmed: 31381333
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017 Nov;363(2):240-252
pubmed: 28882879
Mol Cancer. 2018 Feb 19;17(1):57
pubmed: 29455639
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Nov 21;11(12):
pubmed: 31766355
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 May 1;20(9):2249-56
pubmed: 24789032
Immunity. 2003 Nov;19(5):669-78
pubmed: 14614854
Nat Methods. 2019 Jul;16(7):595-602
pubmed: 31249422
Mol Pharmacol. 2017 Mar;91(3):208-219
pubmed: 28062735
Br J Haematol. 2015 Aug;170(4):445-56
pubmed: 25858358
Expert Rev Hematol. 2018 Mar;11(3):185-194
pubmed: 29381098
J Immunol. 2003 Dec 1;171(11):5988-96
pubmed: 14634110
Protein Sci. 2010 Mar;19(3):429-39
pubmed: 20052711
J Leukoc Biol. 2014 Feb;95(2):243-50
pubmed: 24249742
Nat Chem Biol. 2011 Jan;7(1):41-50
pubmed: 21113169
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 12;7(1):17405
pubmed: 29234112
Haematologica. 2016 Jul;101(7):e295-8
pubmed: 27151992
Trends Biochem Sci. 2011 Feb;36(2):65-77
pubmed: 20971646
J Med Chem. 2018 Mar 22;61(6):2227-2245
pubmed: 29457982
ACS Chem Biol. 2020 Jul 17;15(7):2005-2016
pubmed: 32479050
Blood. 2010 Oct 28;116(17):3278-85
pubmed: 20519627
Future Med Chem. 2014 Apr;6(6):675-95
pubmed: 24895895
Leukemia. 2015 Apr;29(4):895-900
pubmed: 25189416
Oncogene. 2017 Apr;36(15):2045-2053
pubmed: 27669440
Blood Adv. 2017 May 02;1(12):715-727
pubmed: 29296715
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2019 Apr;17(4):223-233
pubmed: 31188814
Blood. 2005 Jan 1;105(1):259-65
pubmed: 15331445
FEBS J. 2011 Jun;278(12):1990-2000
pubmed: 21362140
Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2019 Apr;29(4):217-241
pubmed: 30888232
Sci Immunol. 2020 Jun 5;5(48):
pubmed: 32503877
J Biol Chem. 2020 Apr 24;295(17):5717-5736
pubmed: 32184360
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 12;370(24):2286-94
pubmed: 24869598
Curr Oncol. 2019 Apr;26(2):e233-e240
pubmed: 31043832
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Mar;1804(3):440-4
pubmed: 19879387
Drug Discov Today. 2015 Sep;20(9):1061-73
pubmed: 26002380
Nat Chem Biol. 2015 Nov;11(11):818-21
pubmed: 26485069
Leukemia. 2017 Jan;31(1):177-185
pubmed: 27282255

Auteurs

Raji E Joseph (RE)

Roy J. Carver Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, United States.

Neha Amatya (N)

Roy J. Carver Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, United States.

D Bruce Fulton (DB)

Roy J. Carver Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, United States.

John R Engen (JR)

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States.

Thomas E Wales (TE)

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, United States.

Amy Andreotti (A)

Roy J. Carver Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH