Everolimus Plus Exemestane Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Previously Treated with CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy.


Journal

The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 17 06 2020
accepted: 13 11 2020
pubmed: 25 11 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 24 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The combination of everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE) is approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (mHRBC) who progress on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) therapy. However, none of the patients enrolled in the trial that led to this approval (BOLERO-2) had previously received CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is), which have since become a frontline standard of care for mHRBC. As such, the clinical benefit of EVE plus EXE in patients who have previously received CDK4/6is remains unknown. Adult patients with mHRBC at our institution who progressed on an NSAI plus CDK4/6i or NSAI therapy alone and were treated with at least one cycle of EVE plus EXE between 2012 and 2018 were analyzed. Collected data included patient demographics, treatment history, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. Primary objectives were to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients who received prior NSAI plus CDK4/6i therapy versus an NSAI alone. Among 43 patients, 17 had prior CDK4/6i exposure. With the exception of de novo metastatic disease, patient and disease characteristics were comparable across treatment cohorts. There was no significant difference in PFS (median, 3.6 vs. 4.2 months) or OS (median, 15.6 vs. 11.3 months) between patients who had received prior CDK4/6is and those who had not, respectively. Prior exposure to CDK4/6i therapy did not impact survival outcomes for patients with mHRBC taking EVE plus EXE. However, there was a trend toward improved OS in the CDK4/6i cohort that should be evaluated in larger cohorts. The use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor has become a standard frontline therapy in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. An approved subsequent line of therapy is everolimus plus exemestane; however, the original data supporting this therapy predated approval of CDK4/6 inhibitors. As such, the clinical benefit of everolimus and exemestane in patients previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor was unknown. This retrospective cohort study offers real-world data demonstrating prior CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure does not impact survival outcomes for everolimus plus exemestane.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The combination of everolimus (EVE) and exemestane (EXE) is approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (mHRBC) who progress on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) therapy. However, none of the patients enrolled in the trial that led to this approval (BOLERO-2) had previously received CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is), which have since become a frontline standard of care for mHRBC. As such, the clinical benefit of EVE plus EXE in patients who have previously received CDK4/6is remains unknown.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Adult patients with mHRBC at our institution who progressed on an NSAI plus CDK4/6i or NSAI therapy alone and were treated with at least one cycle of EVE plus EXE between 2012 and 2018 were analyzed. Collected data included patient demographics, treatment history, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. Primary objectives were to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients who received prior NSAI plus CDK4/6i therapy versus an NSAI alone.
RESULTS
Among 43 patients, 17 had prior CDK4/6i exposure. With the exception of de novo metastatic disease, patient and disease characteristics were comparable across treatment cohorts. There was no significant difference in PFS (median, 3.6 vs. 4.2 months) or OS (median, 15.6 vs. 11.3 months) between patients who had received prior CDK4/6is and those who had not, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Prior exposure to CDK4/6i therapy did not impact survival outcomes for patients with mHRBC taking EVE plus EXE. However, there was a trend toward improved OS in the CDK4/6i cohort that should be evaluated in larger cohorts.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
The use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor has become a standard frontline therapy in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. An approved subsequent line of therapy is everolimus plus exemestane; however, the original data supporting this therapy predated approval of CDK4/6 inhibitors. As such, the clinical benefit of everolimus and exemestane in patients previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor was unknown. This retrospective cohort study offers real-world data demonstrating prior CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure does not impact survival outcomes for everolimus plus exemestane.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33230905
doi: 10.1002/onco.13609
pmc: PMC7873317
doi:

Substances chimiques

Androstadienes 0
Hormones 0
Everolimus 9HW64Q8G6G
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1
CDK4 protein, human EC 2.7.11.22
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 EC 2.7.11.22
exemestane NY22HMQ4BX
Sirolimus W36ZG6FT64

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101-106

Informations de copyright

© 2020 AlphaMed Press.

Références

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 May;16(5S):605-610
pubmed: 29784737
Ann Oncol. 2014 Dec;25(12):2357-2362
pubmed: 25231953
Lancet Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):654-662
pubmed: 28314691
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1925-1936
pubmed: 27959613
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 9;366(6):520-9
pubmed: 22149876
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Feb;17(2):141-147
pubmed: 30787127
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 3;375(18):1738-1748
pubmed: 27717303
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 10;35(32):3638-3646
pubmed: 28968163
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1926-1936
pubmed: 30345905
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2005 May;3(3):309-14
pubmed: 16002003
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Nov 01;5(11):1556-1564
pubmed: 31465093

Auteurs

Madeline M Cook (MM)

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Luai Al Rabadi (L)

Department of Hematology Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Andy J Kaempf (AJ)

Knight Cancer Institute Biostatistics Shared Resource, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Megan M Saraceni (MM)

Department of Pharmacy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Michael A Savin (MA)

Department of Hematology Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Zahi I Mitri (ZI)

Department of Hematology Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH