Severe gastroparesis is associated with an increased incidence of slow-transit constipation as measured by wireless motility capsule.


Journal

Neurogastroenterology and motility
ISSN: 1365-2982
Titre abrégé: Neurogastroenterol Motil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9432572

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2021
Historique:
revised: 21 10 2020
received: 08 02 2020
accepted: 03 11 2020
pubmed: 25 11 2020
medline: 1 1 2022
entrez: 24 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Dysmotility in one region of the gastrointestinal tract has been found to predispose patients to developing motility disorders in other gastrointestinal segments. However, few studies have evaluated the relationship between gastroparesis and constipation. Retrospective review of 224 patients who completed 4-hour, solid-phase gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), and wireless motility capsule (WMC) testing to evaluate for gastroparesis and slow-transit constipation, respectively. When available, anorectal manometry data were reviewed to evaluate for dyssynergic defecation. Patients were divided into two groups based on the results of the GES: 101 patients with normal gastric emptying and 123 patients with gastroparesis (stratified by severity). Differences in constipation rates were compared between the groups. Slow-transit constipation was more common in the gastroparesis group, but statistical significance was not reached (42.3% vs 34.7%, p = 0.304). Univariate logistical regression analysis found no association between slow-transit constipation and gastroparesis (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.80-2.38, p = 0.245) nor dyssynergic defecation and gastroparesis (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.29-2.70, p = 0.822). However, when stratifying gastroparesis based on severity, slow-transit constipation was found to be associated with severe gastroparesis (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.20-5.00, p = 0.014). This association was strengthened with the exclusion of patients with diabetes mellitus (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.39-8.83, p = 0.008) - a potential confounder. Patients with severe gastroparesis (>35% gastric retention at the 4-hour mark on solid-phase GES) have an increased likelihood of having underlying slow-transit constipation. Dyssynergic defecation does not appear to be associated with gastroparesis (of any severity).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Dysmotility in one region of the gastrointestinal tract has been found to predispose patients to developing motility disorders in other gastrointestinal segments. However, few studies have evaluated the relationship between gastroparesis and constipation.
METHODS
Retrospective review of 224 patients who completed 4-hour, solid-phase gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), and wireless motility capsule (WMC) testing to evaluate for gastroparesis and slow-transit constipation, respectively. When available, anorectal manometry data were reviewed to evaluate for dyssynergic defecation. Patients were divided into two groups based on the results of the GES: 101 patients with normal gastric emptying and 123 patients with gastroparesis (stratified by severity). Differences in constipation rates were compared between the groups.
KEY RESULTS
Slow-transit constipation was more common in the gastroparesis group, but statistical significance was not reached (42.3% vs 34.7%, p = 0.304). Univariate logistical regression analysis found no association between slow-transit constipation and gastroparesis (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.80-2.38, p = 0.245) nor dyssynergic defecation and gastroparesis (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.29-2.70, p = 0.822). However, when stratifying gastroparesis based on severity, slow-transit constipation was found to be associated with severe gastroparesis (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.20-5.00, p = 0.014). This association was strengthened with the exclusion of patients with diabetes mellitus (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.39-8.83, p = 0.008) - a potential confounder.
CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES
Patients with severe gastroparesis (>35% gastric retention at the 4-hour mark on solid-phase GES) have an increased likelihood of having underlying slow-transit constipation. Dyssynergic defecation does not appear to be associated with gastroparesis (of any severity).

Identifiants

pubmed: 33231369
doi: 10.1111/nmo.14045
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e14045

Informations de copyright

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Vavricka S, Greuter T. Gastroparesis and dumping syndrome: current concepts and management. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1-14.
Camilleri M, Parkman H, Shafi M, et al. Clinical guideline: management of gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:18-37.
Navas C, Patel N, Lacy B. Gastroparesis: medical and therapeutic advances. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:2231-2240.
Soykan I, Sivri B, Sarosiek I, et al. Demography, clinical characteristics, psychological and abuse profiles, treatment, and long-term follow-up of patients with gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43(11):2398-2404.
Tougas G, Eaker E, Abell T, et al. Assessment of gastric emptying using a low-fat meal: establishment of international control values. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(6):1456-1462.
Hasler W, Parkman H, Wilson L, et al. Psychological dysfunction is associated with symptom severity but not disease etiology or degree of gastric retention in patients with gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(11):2357-2367.
Szarka L, Camilleri M. Evaluation of patients with suspected gastroparesis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2019;29:39-54.
Camilleri M. Diabetic gastroparesis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:820-829.
Waseem S, Moshiree B, Draganov P. Gastroparesis: current diagnostic challenges and management considerations. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:25-37.
Sanchez M, Bercik P. Epidemiology and burden of chronic constipation. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25:11-15.
Bharucha A, Dorn S, Lembo A, et al. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(1):211-217.
Hayat U, Dugum M, Garg S. Chronic Constipation: update on management. Clevel Clin J Med. 2017;84(5):397-408.
Mugie S, Benninga M, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;25:3-18.
Lembo A, Camilleri M. Chronic constipation. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1360-1368.
Sharif H, Devadason D, Abrehart N, et al. Imaging measurement of whole gut transit-time in paediatric and adult functional gastrointestinal disorders: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Diagnostics. 2019;9(4):1-15.
Maurer A. Gastrointestinal motility, Part 1: esophageal transit and gastric emptying. J Nucl Med Technol. 2016;44(1):1-11.
Solnes L, Sheikhbahaei S, Ziessman H. Nuclear scintigraphy in practice: gastrointestinal motility. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211:260-266.
Maurer A. Gastrointestinal motility, part 2: small bowel and colon transit. J Nucl Med Technol. 2016;44(1):12-18.
Sarosiek I, Selover KH, Katz LA, et al. The assessment of regional gut transit times in healthy controls and patients with gastroparesis using wireless motility technology. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:313-322.
Prather C. Subtypes of constipation: sorting out the confusion. Rev Gastroenterol Dis. 2004;4:511-516.
Tran K, Brun R, Kuo B. Evaluation of regional and whole gut motility using the wireless motility capsule: relevance in clinical practice. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2012;5(4):249-260.
Parkman H. Assessment of gastric emptying and small-bowel motility: scintigraphy, breath tests, manometry, and smartpill. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2009;19:49-55.
Saad R. The wireless motility capsule: a one-stop shop for the evaluation of GI motility disorders. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016;18:1-7.
Rao S, Kuo B, McCallum R, et al. Investigation of colonic and whole-gut transit with wireless motility capsule and radiopaque markers in constipation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:537-544.
Rao S, Coss-Adame E, Valestin J, et al. Evaluation of constipation in older adults: radiopaque markers (ROMs) versus wireless motility capsule (WMC). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;55:289-294.
Camilleri M, Thorne N, Ringel Y, et al. Wireless pH-motility capsule for colonic transit: prospective comparison with radiopaque markers in chronic constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;22:874-882.
Rao S, Rattanakovit K, Patcharatrakul T. Diagnosis and management of chronic constipation in adults. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13:295-305.
Zikos T, Clarke J, Triadafilopoulos G, et al. A positive correlation between gastric and esophageal dysmotility suggests common causality. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63:3417-3424.
Zikos T, Kamal A, Neshatian L, et al. High prevalence of slow-transit constipation in patients with gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019;25:267-275.
Hasler W, May K, Wilson L, et al. Relating gastric scintigraphy and symptoms to motility capsule transit and pressure findings in suspected gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30:1-12.
Wang YT, Mohammed SD, Farmer AD, et al. Regional gastrointestinal transit and pH studied in 215 healthy volunteers using the wireless motility capsule: influence of age, gender, study country, and testing protocol. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42:761-772.
Farmer A, Scott M, Hobson A. Gastrointestinal motility revisited: the wireless motility capsule. United European Gastroenterol J. 2013;1(6):413-421.
Rao S, Patcharatrakul T. Diagnosis and treatment of dyssynergic defecation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22(3):423-435.
Camilleri M, Colemont L, Phillips S, et al. Human gastric emptying and colonic filling of solids characterized by a new method. Am J Physiol. 1989;257:284-290.
Thomas A. Gut motility, sphincters, and reflex control. Anaesth Intensive Care Med. 2006;7(2):57-58.
Deiteren A, Camilleri M, Burton D, et al. Effect of meal ingestion on ileocolonic and colonic transit in health and irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55(2):384-391.
Boccia G, Buonavolonta R, Coccorullo P, et al. Dyspeptic symptoms in children: the result of a constipation-induced cologastric brake? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:556-560.
Youle M, Read N. Effect of painless rectal distension on gastrointestinal transit of solid meal. Dig Dis Sci. 1984;29(10):902-906.
Tjeerdsma H, Smout A, Akkermans L. Voluntary suppression of defecation delays gastric emptying. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38(5):832-836.
Coremans G, Geypens B, Vos R, et al. Influence of continuous isobaric rectal distension on gastric emptying and small bowel transit in young healthy women. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16:107-111.

Auteurs

Mark Radetic (M)

Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Afrin Kamal (A)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA, USA.

Carol Rouphael (C)

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Lei Kou (L)

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Ruishen Lyu (R)

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Michael Cline (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, & Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH