Isotoxic Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Feasibility Study.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
/ mortality
Chemoradiotherapy
/ adverse effects
Contraindications
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Esophagitis
/ etiology
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ mortality
Male
Middle Aged
Organs at Risk
/ radiation effects
Platinum Compounds
/ administration & dosage
Precision Medicine
/ methods
Prospective Studies
Radiation Injuries
/ complications
Radiation Pneumonitis
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
/ adverse effects
United Kingdom
Journal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2021
01 04 2021
Historique:
received:
21
07
2020
revised:
03
11
2020
accepted:
12
11
2020
pubmed:
25
11
2020
medline:
30
7
2021
entrez:
24
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Not all patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are suitable for concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Local failure rate is high for sequential concurrent CRT. As such, there is a rationale for treatment intensification. Isotoxic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a multicenter feasibility study that combines different intensification strategies including hyperfractionation, acceleration, and dose escalation facilitated by IMRT. Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2, and unsuitable for concurrent CRT were recruited. A minimum of 2 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy was compulsory before starting radiation therapy (RT). Radiation dose was increased until a maximum dose of 79.2 Gy was reached or 1 or more of the organs at risk met predefined constraints. RT was delivered in 1.8-Gy fractions twice daily, and an RT quality assurance program was implemented. The primary objective was the delivery of isotoxic IMRT to a dose >60 Gy equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2 assuming an α/β ratio of 10 Gy for acute reacting tissues). Thirty-seven patients were recruited from 7 UK centers. Median age was 69.9 years (range, 46-86 years). The male-to-female ratio was 17:18. ECOG PS was 0 to 5 in 14.2% of patients; PS was 1 to 27 in 77.1% of patients; PS was 2 to 3 in 8.6% of patients. Stage IIIA:IIIB ratio was 22:13 (62.9%:37.1%). Of 37 patients, 2 (5.4%) failed to achieve EQD2 > 60 Gy. Median prescribed tumor dose was 77.4 Gy (range, 61.2-79.2 Gy). A maximum dose of 79.2Gy was achieved in 14 patients (37.8%). Grade 3 esophagitis was reported in 2 patients, and no patients developed grade 3 to 4 pneumonitis. There were 3 grade 5 events: acute radiation pneumonitis, bronchopulmonary hemorrhage, and acute lung infection. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 25.4 months (range, 8.0-44.2) months for 11 of 35 survivors. The median survival was 18.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.9-30.6), 2-year overall survival was 33.6% (95% CI, 17.9-50.1), and progression-free survival was 23.9% (95% CI, 11.3-39.1). Isotoxic IMRT is a well-tolerated and feasible approach to treatment intensification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33232772
pii: S0360-3016(20)34562-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.040
pmc: PMC7955281
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Platinum Compounds
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1341-1348Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C17052/A15702
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Lung Cancer. 2018 Aug;122:180-186
pubmed: 30032828
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(2):293-301
pubmed: 27743888
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Aug 1;71(5):1394-401
pubmed: 18258380
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Sep 1;63(1):170-8
pubmed: 16111586
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Jun;135:141-146
pubmed: 31015160
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991 Mar 20;83(6):417-23
pubmed: 1847977
Lung Cancer. 1999 Apr;24(1):31-7
pubmed: 10403692
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;85:106-113
pubmed: 28898766
Lung Cancer. 2014 Feb;83(2):117-25
pubmed: 24373738
Ann Oncol. 2009 Jan;20(1):98-102
pubmed: 18718891
J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Apr;7(4):716-22
pubmed: 22425920
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Mar;2(3):359-67
pubmed: 26606200
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;38(7):706-714
pubmed: 31841363
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug 1;30(22):2788-97
pubmed: 22753901
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Mar;118(3):471-7
pubmed: 26687902
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):56-62
pubmed: 28034064
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Oct;31(10):688-696
pubmed: 31514942
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Aug 1;95(5):1367-1377
pubmed: 27296040
Lung Cancer. 2018 Apr;118:139-147
pubmed: 29571993
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Oct;125(1):62-65
pubmed: 28939179
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):125-7
pubmed: 25601340
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Oct;48(15):2339-46
pubmed: 22608261
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Sep;128(3):520-533
pubmed: 29908871
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Oct 1;102(2):434-442
pubmed: 29908945
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2342-2350
pubmed: 30280658
Biometrics. 1995 Dec;51(4):1372-83
pubmed: 8589229
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Feb;131:166-173
pubmed: 30327236
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Nov;9(11):1598-608
pubmed: 25436795
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 15;6(4):e010457
pubmed: 27084277
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):e019903
pubmed: 30700475
J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 1;28(13):2181-90
pubmed: 20351327
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 1;31(34):4343-8
pubmed: 24145340
J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 1;35(13):1387-1394
pubmed: 28113017
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Apr;127(1):1-5
pubmed: 29605476
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):187-99
pubmed: 25601342
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Oct;193(10):812-822
pubmed: 28733723