Iron chelators for acute stroke.
Journal
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 11 2020
24 11 2020
Historique:
entrez:
25
11
2020
pubmed:
26
11
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Stroke is the second leading cause of death and a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Retrospective clinical and animal studies have demonstrated neuroprotective effects of iron chelators in people with haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke. This is the first update of the original Cochrane Review published in 2012. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of iron-chelating drugs in people with acute stroke. We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (2 September 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2019, Issue 9; 2 September 2019), MEDLINE Ovid (2 September 2019), Embase Ovid (2 September 2019), and Science Citation Index (2 September 2019). We also searched ongoing trials registers. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of iron chelators versus no iron chelators or placebo for the treatment of acute stroke, including subarachnoid haemorrhage. Two review authors independently screened the search results. We obtained the full texts of potentially relevant studies and evaluated them for eligibility. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Two RCTs (333 participants) were eligible for inclusion; both compared the iron-chelating agent deferoxamine against placebo. Both studies evaluated participants with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. We assessed one study to have a low risk of bias; the other study had potential sources of bias. The limited and heterogeneous data did not allow for meta-analysis of the outcome parameters. The evidence suggests that administration of deferoxamine may result in little to no difference in deaths (8% in placebo vs 8% in deferoxamine at 180 days; 1 RCT, 291 participants; low-certainty evidence). These RCTs suggest that there may be little to no difference in good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2) between groups at 30, 90 and 180 days (placebo vs deferoxamine: 67% vs 57% at 30 days and 36% vs 45% at 180 days; 2 RCTs, 333 participants; low-certainty evidence). One RCT suggests that administration of deferoxamine may not increase the number of serious adverse events or deaths (placebo vs deferoxamine: 33% vs 27% at 180 days; risk ratio 0.81, 95 % confidence interval 0.57 to 1.16; 1 RCT, 291 participants; low-certainty evidence). No data were available on any deaths within the treatment period. Deferoxamine may result in little to no difference in the evolution of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores from baseline to 90 days (placebo vs deferoxamine: 13 to 4 vs 13 to 3; P = 0.37; 2 RCTs, 333 participants; low-certainty evidence). Deferoxamine may slightly reduce relative oedema surrounding intracerebral haemorrhage at 15 days (placebo vs deferoxamine: 1.91 vs 10.26; P = 0.042; 2 RCTs, 333 participants; low-certainty evidence). Neither study reported quality of life. We identified two eligible RCTs for assessment. We could not demonstrate any benefit for the use of iron chelators in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. The added value of iron-chelating therapy in people with ischaemic stroke or subarachnoid haemorrhage remains unknown.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Stroke is the second leading cause of death and a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Retrospective clinical and animal studies have demonstrated neuroprotective effects of iron chelators in people with haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke. This is the first update of the original Cochrane Review published in 2012.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of iron-chelating drugs in people with acute stroke.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (2 September 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2019, Issue 9; 2 September 2019), MEDLINE Ovid (2 September 2019), Embase Ovid (2 September 2019), and Science Citation Index (2 September 2019). We also searched ongoing trials registers.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of iron chelators versus no iron chelators or placebo for the treatment of acute stroke, including subarachnoid haemorrhage.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened the search results. We obtained the full texts of potentially relevant studies and evaluated them for eligibility. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool, and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
Two RCTs (333 participants) were eligible for inclusion; both compared the iron-chelating agent deferoxamine against placebo. Both studies evaluated participants with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. We assessed one study to have a low risk of bias; the other study had potential sources of bias. The limited and heterogeneous data did not allow for meta-analysis of the outcome parameters. The evidence suggests that administration of deferoxamine may result in little to no difference in deaths (8% in placebo vs 8% in deferoxamine at 180 days; 1 RCT, 291 participants; low-certainty evidence). These RCTs suggest that there may be little to no difference in good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 2) between groups at 30, 90 and 180 days (placebo vs deferoxamine: 67% vs 57% at 30 days and 36% vs 45% at 180 days; 2 RCTs, 333 participants; low-certainty evidence). One RCT suggests that administration of deferoxamine may not increase the number of serious adverse events or deaths (placebo vs deferoxamine: 33% vs 27% at 180 days; risk ratio 0.81, 95 % confidence interval 0.57 to 1.16; 1 RCT, 291 participants; low-certainty evidence). No data were available on any deaths within the treatment period. Deferoxamine may result in little to no difference in the evolution of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores from baseline to 90 days (placebo vs deferoxamine: 13 to 4 vs 13 to 3; P = 0.37; 2 RCTs, 333 participants; low-certainty evidence). Deferoxamine may slightly reduce relative oedema surrounding intracerebral haemorrhage at 15 days (placebo vs deferoxamine: 1.91 vs 10.26; P = 0.042; 2 RCTs, 333 participants; low-certainty evidence). Neither study reported quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We identified two eligible RCTs for assessment. We could not demonstrate any benefit for the use of iron chelators in spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. The added value of iron-chelating therapy in people with ischaemic stroke or subarachnoid haemorrhage remains unknown.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33236783
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009280.pub3
pmc: PMC8095068
doi:
Substances chimiques
Iron Chelating Agents
0
Neuroprotective Agents
0
Placebos
0
Deferoxamine
J06Y7MXW4D
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00777140', 'NCT02216513', 'NCT02875262', 'NCT03754725']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
CD009280Subventions
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : ETM/417
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : UpdateOf
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Références
Curr Med Chem. 2007;14(8):857-74
pubmed: 17430141
Stroke. 2010 Apr;41(4):810-3
pubmed: 20185788
J Neurosurg. 2002 Feb;96(2):287-93
pubmed: 11838803
BMJ. 1998 Sep 12;317(7160):727
pubmed: 9732340
Neurosurgery. 1991 Jan;28(1):27-32
pubmed: 1994279
Circulation. 2001 Jun 12;103(23):2799-804
pubmed: 11401935
Future Med Chem. 2009 Dec;1(9):1643-70
pubmed: 21425984
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2011 Feb;118(2):223-31
pubmed: 21165659
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002 May;22(5):520-5
pubmed: 11973424
Brain Res. 2009 Sep 29;1291:113-21
pubmed: 19631616
Ageing Res Rev. 2004 Jul;3(3):345-53
pubmed: 15231241
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009 Sep;330(3):679-86
pubmed: 19509317
J Neurosurg. 1992 Nov;77(5):763-7
pubmed: 1403120
Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):428-438
pubmed: 30898550
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;(9):CD009280
pubmed: 22972139
Brain Res. 1996 Jul 8;726(1-2):23-30
pubmed: 8836541
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD000277
pubmed: 17636626
Stroke. 1999 Aug;30(8):1538-41
pubmed: 10436097
Cardiovasc Res. 1995 Oct;30(4):493-500
pubmed: 8574997
Stroke. 2010 Feb;41(2):375-82
pubmed: 20044521
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 29;(7):CD000213
pubmed: 25072528
Lancet. 1975 Mar 1;1(7905):480-4
pubmed: 46957
J Neurosci Res. 2003 Jul 1;73(1):113-21
pubmed: 12815715
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142
pubmed: 31643080
Stroke. 2011 Nov;42(11):3067-74
pubmed: 21868742
Biochem J. 1984 Apr 1;219(1):1-14
pubmed: 6326753
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD000029
pubmed: 18646056
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0122371
pubmed: 25875777
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011 Jun;31(6):1412-23
pubmed: 21245873
Neurosurgery. 1997 Dec;41(6):1385-91; discussion 1391-2
pubmed: 9402590
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010 Nov;30(11):1793-803
pubmed: 20736956
Neurology. 2000 Apr 25;54(8):1568-74
pubmed: 10762495
Stroke. 2009 Jun;40(6):2241-3
pubmed: 19372448
Neurocrit Care. 2013 Oct;19(2):257-66
pubmed: 23943316
J Neurosci. 1999 Nov 15;19(22):9821-30
pubmed: 10559391
Stroke. 2009 Mar;40(3 Suppl):S90-1
pubmed: 19064798
Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):439-458
pubmed: 30871944
J Neurotrauma. 1996 Apr;13(4):223-31
pubmed: 8860203
Neurosci Bull. 2008 Apr;24(2):89-95
pubmed: 18369388
Brain Res. 2002 Oct 11;952(1):1-6
pubmed: 12363398
Stroke. 2007 Jan;38(1):90-5
pubmed: 17138950
J Neurosurg. 2004 Apr;100(4):672-8
pubmed: 15070122