Estimating the global economic benefits of physically active populations over 30 years (2020-2050).
economics
physical activity
statistics
Journal
British journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1473-0480
Titre abrégé: Br J Sports Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0432520
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
accepted:
03
09
2020
entrez:
26
11
2020
pubmed:
27
11
2020
medline:
18
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We assess the potential benefits of increased physical activity for the global economy for 23 countries and the rest of the world from 2020 to 2050. The main factors taken into account in the economic assessment are excess mortality and lower productivity. This study links three methodologies. First, we estimate the association between physical inactivity and workplace productivity using multivariable regression models with proprietary data on 120 143 individuals in the UK and six Asian countries (Australia, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Thailand, Singapore and Sri Lanka). Second, we analyse the association between physical activity and mortality risk through a meta-regression analysis with data from 74 prior studies with global coverage. Finally, the estimated effects are combined in a computable general equilibrium macroeconomic model to project the economic benefits of physical activity over time. Doing at least 150 min of moderate-intensity physical activity per week, as per lower limit of the range recommended by the 2020 WHO guidelines, would lead to an increase in global gross domestic product (GDP) of 0.15%-0.24% per year by 2050, worth up to US$314-446 billion per year and US$6.0-8.6 trillion cumulatively over the 30-year projection horizon (in 2019 prices). The results vary by country due to differences in baseline levels of physical activity and GDP per capita. Increasing physical activity in the population would lead to reduction in working-age mortality and morbidity and an increase in productivity, particularly through lower presenteeism, leading to substantial economic gains for the global economy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33239354
pii: bjsports-2020-102590
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102590
pmc: PMC7719903
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1482-1487Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Health Econ. 2009 Jan;28(1):221-33
pubmed: 19062116
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Sep 24;8:99
pubmed: 21943093
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(3):265-70
pubmed: 24149097
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95
pubmed: 12900694
J Health Econ. 2005 Nov;24(6):1055-75
pubmed: 16139909
J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Jun;61(6):469-478
pubmed: 30985409
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1077-e1086
pubmed: 30193830
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Dec 19;4(2):2381468319894345
pubmed: 31903422
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Nov;49(11):2158-2166
pubmed: 29045322
Int J Forecast. 1990 Dec;6(4):521-30
pubmed: 12285033
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1311-24
pubmed: 27475266
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Oct;51(19):1392-1409
pubmed: 28446455
EBioMedicine. 2015 Dec 22;4:184-90
pubmed: 26981556
Health Policy. 2013 Jan;109(1):78-87
pubmed: 23182564
Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):219-29
pubmed: 22818936
J Med Econ. 2020 Sep;23(9):994-1003
pubmed: 32397770
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):353-65
pubmed: 10146874
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462
pubmed: 33239350