The effects of stimulus magnitude and duration during pretrial delivery of preferred items to increase compliance.
compliance
duration
noncompliance
response-independent delivery
stimulus magnitude
Journal
Journal of applied behavior analysis
ISSN: 1938-3703
Titre abrégé: J Appl Behav Anal
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0174763
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
revised:
08
10
2020
received:
04
03
2020
accepted:
08
10
2020
pubmed:
27
11
2020
medline:
18
9
2021
entrez:
26
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Previous research has suggested that the response-independent delivery of preferred stimuli can increase compliance to low-probability instructions, although these results have been mixed. Two variables that might affect compliance during this procedure are the magnitude and duration of access to the stimuli. In the current study, we evaluated stimulus magnitude and duration of access during pretrial delivery of preferred items on compliance among children with autism. In Experiment 1, we compared high and low magnitude edible stimuli. In Experiment 2, we compared long and short durations of access to leisure stimuli. Results show that high magnitudes and long durations of access to preferred stimuli delivered once immediately before a low-probability instruction increased compliance more than low magnitudes and short durations of access to preferred stimuli. We discuss the implications and possible mechanisms responsible for these results.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
713-724Informations de copyright
© 2020 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (SEAB).
Références
Bullock, C., & Normand, M. P. (2006). The effects of a high probability instruction sequence and response-independent reinforcer delivery on child compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(4), 495-499. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2006.115-05
Carr, E. G., Newsom, C. D., & Binkoff, J. A. (1976). Stimulus control of self-destructive behavior in a psychotic child. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 4(2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916518
Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(2), 491-498. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491
Horner, R. D., & Keilitz, I. (1975). Training mentally retarded adolescents to brush their teeth. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(3), 301-309. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1975.8-301
Kennedy, C. H., Itkonen, T., & Lindquist, K. (1995). Comparing interspersed requests and social comments as antecedents for increasing student compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(3), 97-98. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1995.28-97
Lalli, J. S., Vollmer, T. R., Progar, P. R., Wright, C., Borrero, J., Daniel, D., Hoffner Barthold, C., Tocco, K., & May, W. (1999). Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(3), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1999.32-285
Lipschultz, J., Wilder, D., & Enderli, A. (2017). Effects of response independent delivery of preferred items and the high-probability instructional sequence on compliance. Behavioral Interventions, 32(2), 144-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1474
Lomas, J. E., Fisher, W. W., & Kelley, M. E. (2010). The effects of variable-time delivery of food items and praise on problem behavior reinforced by escape. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(3), 425-435. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-425
Mace, F. C., Hock, M. L., Lalli, J. S., West, B. J., Belfiore, P., Pinter, E., & Brown, D. K. (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1988.21-123
McMahon, R., & Forehand, R. (2003). Helping the noncompliant child (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Normand, M. P., & Beaulieu, L. (2011). Further evaluation of response-independent delivery of preferred stimuli and child compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(3), 665-669. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-665
Roantree, C. F., & Kennedy, C. H. (2006). A paradoxical effect of presession attention on stereortypy: Antecedent attention as an establishing, not an abolishing operation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(3), 381-384. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2006.97-05
Rortvedt, A. K., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1994). Analysis of a high probability instructional sequence and time-out in the treatment of child noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(2), 327-330. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-327
Slocum, S. K., & Vollmer, T. R. (2015). A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48(3), 563-574. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.216
Stephenson, K. M., & Hanley, G. P. (2010). Preschoolers' compliance with simple instructions: A descriptive and experimental evaluation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4(2), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-229
Wilder, D. A., & Atwell, J. (2006). Evaluation of a guided compliance procedure to reduce noncompliance among preschool children. Behavioral Interventions, 21(4), 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.222
Wilder, D. A., Zonneveld, K., Harris, C., Marcus, A., & Reagan, R. (2007). Further analysis of antecedent interventions on preschoolers' compliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(3), 535-539. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.40-535