Effect of the EQUIP initiative on additional images performed at screening mammography: a pilot study.


Journal

Clinical imaging
ISSN: 1873-4499
Titre abrégé: Clin Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8911831

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
received: 17 08 2020
revised: 26 10 2020
accepted: 11 11 2020
pubmed: 29 11 2020
medline: 7 4 2021
entrez: 28 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Enhancing Quality Using the Inspection Program (EQUIP) initiative was launched to improve clinical image quality. The purpose of this study was to determine if the implementation of the EQUIP reporting system resulted in an increased number of extra views performed at the technologists' discretion during screening mammography. Following IRB approval at a single comprehensive cancer center, patients who underwent screening mammography with combination full-field digital mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis during a 6-month period before (January 2017 to June 2017) and after (January 2018 to June 2018) EQUIP implementation were identified. For each patient, both screening mammograms were retrospectively reviewed by 1 of 3 subspecialized breast radiologists (3-10 years of experience). The following data were recorded: demographics, breast density, surgical history, technologist, number and type of extra views, final BI-RADS assessment, radiologist-assigned indication for the view, and radiologist-assigned necessity of the view. McNemar's test for paired data was computed with p value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Of 820 patients, 370 (45%) had additional views in 2018 compared to 317 (39%) in 2017. After EQUIP, patients were 38% more likely to have additional views (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.11-1.73). The total number of additional views in 2018 was 636 compared to 530 in 2017 (20% increase). Among patients with extra views in both years, the number of additional views per patient did not significantly increase post EQUIP implementation (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.73-1.92). The most common extra view was exaggerated craniocaudal lateral, and the most common reason cited by the reviewing radiologist was lateral fibroglandular tissue at the edge of the images. Most of the extra views performed in 2018 were not performed in 2017 and over half were deemed unnecessary. Eight of eleven technologists demonstrated an increased frequency of screening mammograms with extra views performed post EQUIP. Following EQUIP implementation, screening mammography patients were significantly more likely to have extra views performed at the technologists' discretion. Our findings emphasize the importance of ongoing technologist education and radiologist feedback.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33248358
pii: S0899-7071(20)30467-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.036
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

13-17

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Shannon Falcon (S)

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Electronic address: Shannon.Falcon@moffitt.org.

Kimberly Funaro (K)

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Electronic address: Kimberly.Funaro@moffitt.org.

Angela Williams (A)

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Electronic address: Angela.Williams@moffitt.org.

Bethany Lynn Niell (BL)

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Electronic address: Bethany.Niell@moffitt.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH