Myocardial contractility recovery following acute pressure unloading after transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis and different left ventricular geometry: a multilayer longitudinal strain echocardiographicanalysis.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve
/ diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional
Female
Humans
Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Myocardial Contraction
Predictive Value of Tests
Recovery of Function
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
/ diagnostic imaging
Ventricular Function, Left
Ventricular Remodeling
Aortic stenosis
Strain echocardiography
TAVI
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
03
09
2020
accepted:
13
10
2020
pubmed:
1
12
2020
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
30
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Aim of the present study was to describe the left ventricular longitudinal strain (LS) in all myocardial layers in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in different LV geometry and to compare LS analysis before and early after acute LV unloading provided by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). 68 patients were enrolled. LS was measured from the endocardial layer (Endo-LS), epicardial layer (Epi-LS) and full thickness of myocardium (Transmural-LS) before and after TAVI. Patients were divided in two groups accordingly with relative wall thickness (RWT): concentric LV hypertrophy (cLVH) vs eccentric LV hypertrophy (eLVH). Less impaired values of LS at baseline were observed, in all layers, in patients with cLVHas compared to patients with eLVH (Endo-LS was - 13.2 ± 2 vs - 11.1±3 %, p = 0.041; Epi-LS was - 11.8 ± 1.8 vs - 9.9 ± 3 %, p = 0.043; Transmural-LS was - 12.3 ± 1.8 vs - 10.49 ± 3.3 %, p = 0.02, respectively). A significant improvement in endocardial LS (Endo-LS) after TAVI was detected only in cLVH(- 13 ± 2 vs - 14 ± 2, p = 0.011). Our findings documented that concentric LVH had better basal strain function and showed a better myocardial recovery after TAVI compared to eLVH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33251555
doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02074-2
pii: 10.1007/s10554-020-02074-2
pmc: PMC7969538
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
965-970Références
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Feb 15;125(4):583-588
pubmed: 31843234
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791
pubmed: 28886619
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016 Dec;29(12):1217-1228
pubmed: 27751650
Am Heart J. 2020 Feb;220:184-191
pubmed: 31862472
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Feb;32(2):247-259
pubmed: 26323357
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Aug;12(8 Pt 1):1532-1548
pubmed: 31395243
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec 1;19(12):1390-1396
pubmed: 29211878
Am J Med. 2015 Apr;128(4):344-52
pubmed: 25460869
Cardiol J. 2015;22(6):613-21
pubmed: 26100828
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 6;60(19):1854-63
pubmed: 23062541
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan;12(1):213-214
pubmed: 30448134
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 18;58(17):1733-40
pubmed: 21996383
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Apr 15;281:69-75
pubmed: 30711265
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jan;110(1):26-34
pubmed: 27839677
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Jan;22(1):66-68
pubmed: 32740431
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):408-416
pubmed: 31504364
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 15;123(6):956-960
pubmed: 30594290